Hip Resurfacing in Teenagers.

BACKGROUND: The goals of hip resurfacing are to relieve pain, restore function, and preserve future reconstructive options. Hip resurfacing is an attractive and sometimes the only option when the femoral canal is blocked, making total hip arthroplasty (THA) difficult. Hip resurfacing also can be an attractive option for a teenager on the rare occasion when a hip implant is needed. METHODS: A cementless ceramic-coated femoral resurfacing implant matched with a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular bearing was used in 105 patients (117 hips) aged 12 to 19 years. The mean follow-up was 14 years (range, 5 to 25). No patients were lost to follow-up before 19 years. Osteonecrosis, residuals of trauma, developmental dysplasia, and childhood hip diseases were the common reasons requiring surgery. Patients were evaluated using patient-reported outcomes, patient acceptable symptom states (PASS), and implant survivorships. Radiographs and retrievals were also examined. RESULTS: There were 2 revisions (polyethylene liner exchange at 12 years and femoral revision for osteonecrosis at 14 years). The mean postoperative Hip Disability Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was 94 points (range, 80 to 100) and the mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) score was 96 points (range, 80 to 100). All patients achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference improvement in their HHS and HOOS scores. There were 99 (85%) hip resurfacing procedures achieving a satisfactory PASS and 72 (69%) patients were active in sports. CONCLUSION: Hip resurfacing is a highly technical procedure. Careful implant selection is required. The meticulous preoperative planning, careful extensile surgical exposure, and exacting implant placement in this study likely contributed to the favorable results achieved. Hip resurfacing allows THA as a future option in patients where the lifetime revision rate is a major consideration.

Cementless Metal-Free Ceramic-Coated Shoulder Resurfacing.

Shoulder resurfacing is a versatile, bone-conserving procedure to treat arthritis, avascular necrosis, and rotator cuff arthropathy. Shoulder resurfacing is of interest to young patients who are concerned about implant survivorship and those in need of a high level of physical activity. Using a ceramic surface reduces wear and metal sensitivity to clinically unimportant levels. Between 1989 and 2018, 586 patients received cementless, ceramic-coated shoulder resurfacing implants for arthritis, avascular necrosis, or rotator cuff arthropathy. They were followed for a mean of 11 years and were assessed using the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). CT scans were used in 51 hemiarthroplasty patients to assess the glenoid cartilage wear. Seventy-five patients had a stemmed or stemless implant in the contralateral extremity. A total of 94% of patients had excellent or good clinical results and 92% achieved PASS. 6% of patients required a revision. A total of 86% of patients preferred their shoulder resurfacing prosthesis over a stemmed or stemless shoulder replacement. The glenoid cartilage wear at a mean of 10 years was 0.6 mm by a CT scan. There were no instances of implant sensitivity. Only one implant was removed due to a deep infection. Shoulder resurfacing is an exacting procedure. It is clinically successful, with excellent long-term survivorship in young and active patients. The ceramic surface has no metal sensitivity, very low wear, and, therefore, it is successful as a hemiarthroplasty.

Disease Progression After Unicompartmental Arthroplasty: Add a Compartment or Revise to Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Five percent to 7% of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) require revision for disease progression in untreated compartment(s), most commonly to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA requires removal of bone and usually the anterior cruciate ligament. Preserving the UKA and converting to a bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA) by performing a second UKA is an alternative. METHODS: The results of 73 UKA-BCA patients were compared to 75 patients treated by UKA-TKA revision. Knee Society, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, and patient satisfaction scores were collected by a blinded therapist. Patients were asked about their implant preference and recovery. Twenty-two UKA-BCA revision patients had a UKA (6) or TKA (16) in the contralateral knee; thus, a direct comparison of UKA-BCA to both UKA and TKA was possible. RESULTS: Of the UKA-BCA patients, 69 (94%) had excellent or good, 2 (3%) fair, and 2 (3%) poor outcomes with 1 patient requiring revision to TKA. Of patients with a TKA in the contralateral knee, 13 (81%) preferred the UKA-BCA replacement and 3 (19%) preferred the TKA. All patients said the UKA-BCA revision recovery was similar or easier than their initial UKA. Of UKA-TKA revisions, 59 (79%) had excellent or good, 9 (12%) fair, and 7 (9%) poor outcomes. There was 1 wound infection and 1 re-revision in the UKA-BCA group and 1 wound infection and 3 re-revisions in the UKA-TKA group. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and Knee Society Scores were better for UKA-BCA compared to UKA-TKA. CONCLUSION: UKA-BCA is a successful treatment for disease progression following UKA.

Wear and performance of a tripolar total hip replacement.

Background: An unconstrained tripolar hip replacement matches a large capacity two-piece metal/polyethylene acetabular component with a bipolar prosthesis. This combination of accepted technology is different than the relatively new dual mobility prosthesis. The goal is to protect against dislocation and allow close to a normal range of motion (ROM). So far there has not been enough information about wear and performance of tripolar hip replacement to support its wide use. Methods: Twenty-four tripolar prostheses were retrieved from 23 patients after a mean of 14 years (range, 5-21 years). All implants had been placed in high-demand patients who participated in adventure sports, had occupations where a dislocation would be dangerous, or in patients undergoing revision. The tripolar prosthesis has three important design features: (I) the acetabular component uses highly cross-linked polyethylene with an internal diameter of 41-54 mm, (II) the bipolar is titanium nitride-coated, and (III) the bipolar prosthesis has positive eccentricity. The retrievals were evaluated for wear, performance, and mechanical function. Results: The total volumetric wear was 24 mm3/yr. compared to 54 mm3/yr. For a dual mobility prosthesis and 38 mm3/yr. for a 40 mm conventional hip replacement. The jump distance was 16 mm compared to 12 mm for a 36 mm hip replacement. There was no osteolysis. The combined flexion/extension was 145 compared to 119 for a conventional prosthesis. The mean UCLA score was 7.9. Radiographs showed continued shared movement between the inner and outer articulations. The prosthetic bipolar separation force was 2,180 N. High-demand activities generate approximately 340 N. Conclusions: The wear of this tripolar hip prosthesis is low below the osteolytic threshold. The increased ROM and increased jump distance provide the most stable unconstrained hip replacement available. The wear and mechanical performance seen in this study suggest a lifetime of use is possible in even the highest demand patients. The absence of intraprosthetic dislocation, metal wear reaction, and limited acetabular stress shielding make this a safer technology compared to a dual mobility prosthesis.

Hip Replacement or Hip Resurfacing with a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Bearing: A Qualitative and Quantitative Preference Study.

BACKGROUND: Most surgeons strongly prefer total hip arthroplasty (THA) over hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). However, it is unknown whether patients prefer the results of 1 procedure over the other. The purpose of this study was to answer 3 questions: (1) Do patients with an HRA on 1 side and a THA on the other notice a difference? (2) Do patients have a preference? (3) What are the reasons for their preference? METHODS: Between 1998 and 2012, 332 patients underwent staged bilateral hip arthroplasties with cementless THA on 1 side and HRA on the other, with a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular component used for both. Patient preferences, Harris hip scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded by blinded examiners. Patients provided reasons for their preference in semi-structured interviews using both quantitative and qualitative measures. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 7 to 21 years). Of 324 patients with complete data, 279 (86%) preferred the HRA, 19 (6%) preferred the THA, and 26 (8%) had no preference. The most common reasons for preference for the HRA were better balance (n = 143), felt more normal (n = 141), better activity participation/more reliable hip during sports (n = 139), and stronger on stairs (n = 129). A fair or poor outcome was reported by the patient after 4 HRAs and 7 THAs. The remainder of the patients reported improved function and satisfactory pain relief and range of motion for both hips. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, most patients in this study preferred the side on which the HRA had been done. Since essentially all current hip prostheses perform well, a paired bilateral study may be the optimal way to determine patient preferences and values of HRA compared with THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Decision Matrix-Guided Treatment of Infected Hip Resurfacing.

Infection can nullify the benefits of a successful hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). Even with infection, it may be feasible to meet a patient's desire to retain the implant. The author reviewed records of 301 patients with infected hip resurfacing. Patients expressed their treatment preference using a decision matrix that considered treatment efficacy, consequences of treatment failure, probability of infection worsening, and treatment side effects. Patient interviews were analyzed to determine their experience with treatment. Treatment alternatives were (1) no surgery, oral antibiotics, and local incision care; (2) surgical debridement, IV antibiotics, and implant retention; (3) one-stage explantation, IV antibiotics, and reimplantation generally with conversion to total hip replacement; and (4) two-stage reimplantation with conversion to total hip replacement. Mean follow-up was 9 years (range, 2-34). Pretreatment qualitative themes found that some patients believed their early infection symptoms were not validated, leading to diagnostic delays. During treatment, themes centered on mobility and lifestyle limitations for those receiving revision surgery. Posttreatment themes were reduced function following revision compared to pretreatment function. Of the 301 patients, 199 (66%) had nonoperative care, with remission for 169 (85%); 40 (13%) had one-stage reimplantation and 36 (90%) had infection remission; 16 (5%) had two-stage reimplantation with remission in 14 (87%); and 46 (16%) had debridement and implant retention, with remission for 38 (83%). The matrix showed that patients with infected HRA preferred nonoperative care, which was successful for 85%. Qualitative themes found less patient distress with nonoperative treatment and the greatest patient distress with two-stage revision.

Total Articular Knee Replacement Using Polyurethane.

This study reviewed the early use of polyurethane for total knee resurfacing, the long-term results of polycarbonate urethane (PCU) for total knee replacement and conducted wear simulator testing of PCU. In 1959 and 1960, 10 patients underwent total articular polyurethane knee replacement (polyethylene was not available). The polyurethane was placed on the articular surface of the femur with metal surfaces on the tibia and patella. In 1996 and 1997, four patients received a newer PCU tibial insert in revision procedures; all had well-fixed prostheses, but no revision polyethylene implants were available. In addition, this study evaluated six new PCU tibial inserts in a 10-million cycle (Mc) wear simulator. All 10 of the early knees performed well clinically and 2 knees were functional for more than 30 years. Of the four more recent patients, all knees remain functional at more than 20 years' follow-up with no signs of wear or osteolysis. Wear simulator testing found mean material loss of 14.2 mg/Mc which equates to a volumetric wear of 11.9 mg/Mc, similar to the wear of conventional polyethylene. Polyurethane performs well as conventional polyethylene but not better than current cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. Its large wear particles (mean, 11 µm) and biocompatibility are less likely to cause an inflammatory response leading to pain and bone loss. Newer, superior polyurethanes can again be considered a candidate material for the tibial insert of a total knee replacement. A larger study may be able to validate polyurethane as an alternative material for joint replacement.

Polyethylene Hip Resurfacing to Treat Arthritis and Severe Acetabular Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Hip dysplasia is the leading cause of hip arthritis in young adults. These patients often participate in active lifestyles that require a full and stable range of motion. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2011, 232 consecutive polyethylene resurfacing arthroplasties were performed in 201 patients with advanced arthritis from severe acetabular insufficiency due to dysplasia. All patients had Crowe II or III disease. Their mean age at surgery was 43 years. A 2-piece cementless acetabular resurfacing shell with dome screws and a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner were implanted to provide secure fixation, early weight bearing, and a stable hip. Additional structural bone grafts and/or fixation were not used. A cemented or cementless resurfacing prosthesis was used on the femur. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 10 years, 8 hips (3.5%) were converted to a total hip arthroplasty due to acetabular loosening (1), femoral neck fracture (2), femoral osteonecrosis (2), infection (2), or persistent pain (1), resulting in a mean survival of the resurfacing prostheses of 96% (95% confidence interval 89-98). There were no pending revisions and no dislocations. At 2 years postoperative, Harris Hip Scores improved from a preoperative mean of 55 to 97 and University of California Los Angeles activity scores improved from 5 to 8. CONCLUSION: Hip resurfacing using a 2-piece polyethylene acetabular component for advanced dysplasia has resulted in excellent function and implant survivorship with a low rate of complications at mid-term follow-up.

Hip resurfacing in patients with severe osteoarthritis and blocked medullary canal.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effectiveness of hip resurfacing in patients with femoral deformities or retained femoral implants. Implant removal and conversion total hip replacement (CTHR) have been associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and cost. Removing intramedullary nails in particular can be difficult and can result in a more difficult recovery and/or complications. Hip resurfacing can be performed with a blocked femoral canal and has the possible additional benefits of a less-complex procedure, improved functional outcomes, better patient survivorship, and a possibly less-complicated revision should a failure occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The author performed hip resurfacing in 61 patients (65 hips) with a blocked femur who had been advised elsewhere that they could not undergo THR without also undergoing additional surgical procedures. The perioperative complexity of resurfacing was evaluated by recording operative time, blood loss and functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Implant survivorship was evaluated by the need for revision surgery. RESULTS: At 9 years' mean follow-up (range 5-19 years), 59 of the 61 patients presented for postoperative evaluation. The mean operative time was 104 minutes and the mean blood loss was 300 cc. The mean HHS improved from 41 to 92 ( p < 0.001) and the mean SF-12 physical and mental scores improved from 26 to 49 and from 44 to 54, respectively ( p < 0.001). None of the procedures failed or required revision. CONCLUSION: Canal-sparing hip resurfacing is a successful and less complicated option than CTHR when there is deformity or retained implant blocking the femoral canal.

Hip resurfacing with a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner and a titanium nitride-coated femoral component.

AIMS: This study evaluated a specific hip resurfacing system to determine the: (1) function and complications, (2) implant survivorship, (3) acetabular bone conservation and joint biomechanics and (4) osteolysis and polyethylene wear. METHODS: I performed 234 resurfacing procedures (192 patients) using a two-piece titanium acetabular component with a 4 mm highly cross-linked polyethylene liner and a cementless titanium nitride-coated titanium femoral component. Function was assessed with Harris Hip, WOMAC, SF-12, and UCLA scores. Radiography and CT scans were used to evaluate bone retention, component position, joint biomechanics, and osteolysis. Retrieved polyethylene liners were analyzed for wear. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 8 years and patients averaged 48 years of age at surgery. The mean Harris Hip Score was 96 and all scores improved significantly. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 97%. The mean medial acetabular thickness was 9 mm postoperatively versus 14 mm preoperatively ( p = 0.019). Femoral bone conservation (head:neck ratio) was 1.36 postoperatively versus 1.42 preoperatively ( p = 0.02). There was no polyethylene wear through or osteolysis. Eight polyethylene retrievals had a mean wear of 0.05 mm/yr. CONCLUSIONS: Resurfacing with a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular component and a titanium nitride-coated titanium cementless femoral component is a reliable and bone-conserving procedure at mid-term.

Outcome of surgery for nerve injury following total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: During hip replacement, nerves in the operative field can be injured accidently. Additional surgical procedures can help restore function and reduce pain if there has been no recovery. METHODS: One-hundred sixty-two patients presented with nerve injuries, and 113 were candidates for surgical treatment. The author performed 91 procedures on the injured limb (80 patients; 11 had 2 procedures) consisting of shortening, sympathectomy, tendon transfer, neurolysis or nerve repair/graft and 30 spinal and three fibular-neck decompressions. A meaningful recovery was defined as an increase of >1 level in strength or a reduction of >2 points on the visual analogue (VAS) pain scale. RESULTS: Of 21 shortening procedures, 15 improved; of 12 nerve repair/grafting procedures, four improved. No patient >55 years of age made a meaningful recovery from a nerve repair/graft. One obturator nerve was resected and did not improve, and two were buried in muscle and had less pain. Of seven sympathectomies, six had less dysesthetic pain. Of 28 nerves treated with neurolysis, 24 made a meaningful recovery, with 13 making a near complete recovery. Of three fibular decompressions, two recovered completely. Of 20 tendon transfers, 18 made a meaningful recovery. Of 30 spinal decompressions, 25 made a meaningful recovery. There were six (5.3%) surgical complications (2 worsening pain, 2 infections, 2 deformities from tendon transfer). CONCLUSIONS: If a sciatic, femoral or obturator nerve injury due to hip replacement does not recover spontaneously, additional surgical procedures can be of benefit.

Public Perceptions About Nerve Injury From Hip Replacement Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Nerve injury is a distressing complication for patients and surgeons that is difficult and frustrating to understand and treat. Whether the standard of care has been met when this complication occurs is a common question for both patients and surgeons but there is no information about how the public feels about nerve injury. METHODS: The author surveyed 1409 individuals insured in a senior products health program using a 22-item questionnaire about nerve injury during hip replacement. Participants were given written descriptions of total hip arthroplasty, nerve injury, and the standard of care. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of participants indicated that a direct nerve laceration is a standard of care violation. Respectively, 98%, 100%, 94%, and 97% of participants responded that the standard of care requires the surgeon to promptly identify the nerve injury, completely inform the patient about the nature and prognosis of the injury, and present options for treating the nerve injury. Eleven percent indicated that they lack trust in health care. Participants with distrust were more likely to find a standard of care violation than other participants. Women and non-white participants responded more commonly that a standard of care violation occurred with the nerve injury. Income level, age, prior surgery, and educational background were not differentiating factors as to whether participants found that a violation of the standard of care had occurred. CONCLUSION: Most participants would accept the possibility of nerve injury during hip replacement but they would expect to be informed in advance that this complication is possible.

Adventure sports and sexual freedom hip replacement: the tripolar hip.

Certain athletic activities and lifestyles require a completely stable and very mobile hip. Total hip replacement with a natural femoral head size and two mobile-bearing surfaces (i.e., a "tripolar" prosthesis) is the most stable prosthesis. Elegant design and wear-resistant bearing surfaces are the keys to long-term implant survivorship. The hypothesis is that a ceramic-coated tripolar prosthesis using highly cross-linked polyethylene can provide full function and complete stability with low wear. This study sought to determine: (1) patient-reported outcomes, (2) functional outcomes, (3) implant survivorship and complications, and (4) postoperative sexual limitations. Between 1998 and 2011, the author performed 160 primary total hip replacements using tripolar prostheses in patients participating in adventure sports and other physically demanding activities. The institutional review board approved this study. The inclusion criteria were patients who needed unrestricted activity and who were not candidates for or did not choose hip resurfacing. Patients were followed every second year and assessed with radiographs, Harris Hip Score, WOMAC, SF-12, and UCLA functional outcome scores. Patients were asked about symptoms of instability and satisfaction with their hip replacement. Patients were asked both preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively four questions about their sexual activity. Mean follow-up was 11 years. At 2 years' postoperatively, 98% of patients reported their satisfaction as excellent or good and 99% were not limited for sexual activity following surgery. Seventy-four percent of patients reported they were recovered within 6 weeks of surgery. There were no dislocations. There were three revision procedures for implant loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture, but there were no failures of the tripolar articulation. The mean postoperative UCLA score was the highly athletic score of 8. There were no signs of osteolysis, wear, or metal sensitivity reactions. The range of motion achieved, sexual, and functional outcomes were higher than with other types of total hip replacement. This ceramic-coated tripolar prosthesis using highly cross-linked polyethylene provides full function, complete stability, and low wear to younger, active patients, thus confirming the hypothesis and clinical relevance.

Hip Resurfacing Using Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene: Prospective Study Results at 8.5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing is an option to consider when treating younger, more active patients. Advantages over total hip arthroplasty include a more normal gait and a lower incidence of thigh pain. METHODS: In this prospective study, 190 hip resurfacing procedures (164 participants) were performed using a cobalt-chromium femoral component and a cementless acetabular cup with a 3.8-mm highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.5 (range, 7-10) years. Two participants were lost to follow-up and 2 died. One participant underwent successful revision surgery for acetabular loosening. Four participants underwent successful revision to a total hip arthroplasty because of femoral neck fracture (2), femoral loosening, or infection. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 97%. Acetabular bone conservation was assessed using computed tomography by measuring the medial acetabular wall. The mean thickness was 9 mm. Femoral bone was well preserved with a mean head:neck ratio of 1.37. There were 4 (2%) osteolytic defects up to 0.9 cm(3) on computed tomography and no instances of impending polyethylene wear-through. Seven polyethylene retrievals had a measured wear rate of 0.05 mm/y. CONCLUSION: Hip resurfacing using a highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular component is a reliable procedure. Both femoral and acetabular bones are reasonably preserved compared with prior resurfacing methods. The low incidence of osteolysis and the low rate of wear found on retrievals suggest that many years of use in highly active patients is possible.

Salvage of Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Acetabular Components Using a Dual-Mobility Bearing.

BACKGROUND: Large-diameter, monoblock acetabular components have been used for both hip resurfacing arthroplasty and metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). If revision is required, one solution is to retain the shell and use a dual-mobility bearing. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 25 revision THAs including 11 hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 14 MoM THAs where a monoblock acetabular component was mated to a dual-mobility bearing. RESULTS: At a mean of 29 months, there was one failure, an intraprosthetic dislocation of the dual-mobility bearing. There was a significant decrease in serum metal ion levels postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Retention of a well-fixed, monoblock MoM acetabular shell and mating it to a dual-mobility bearing in the setting of revision surgery seems to be a reasonable, low-morbidity option at short-term follow-up in appropriately positioned cups.

Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Replacement Provides Satisfactory Function and Implant Survivorship at 23 Years.

BACKGROUND: One of the goals of a TKA is to approximate the function of a normal knee. Preserving the natural ligaments might provide a method of restoring close to normal function. Sacrifice of the ACL is common and practical during a TKA. However, this ligament is functional in more than 60% of patients undergoing a TKA and kinematic studies support the concept of bicruciate-retaining (that is, ACL-preserving) TKA; however, relatively few studies have evaluated patients treated with bicruciate-retaining TKA implants. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: I asked: (1) what is the long-term (minimum 20-year) survivorship, (2) what are the functional results, and (3) what are the reasons for revision of bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty prostheses? METHODS: From January 1989 to September 1992, I performed 639 total knee replacements in 537 patients. Of these, 489 were performed in 390 patients using a bicruciate-retaining, minimally constrained device. During the period in question, this knee prosthesis was used for all patients observed intraoperatively to have an intact, functional ACL with between 15° varus and 15° valgus joint deformity. There were 234 women and 156 men with a mean age at surgery of 65 years (range, 42-84 years) and a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis in 89%. The patella was resurfaced in all knees. The mean followup was 23 years (range, 20-24 years). At the time of this review, 199 (51%) patients had died and 31 (8%) patients were lost to followup, leaving 160 (41%) patients (214 knees) available for review. Component survivorship was determined by competing-risks analysis and Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis with revision for any reason as the primary endpoint. Patients were evaluated every 2 years to assess ROM, joint laxity, knee stability, and to determine American Knee Society scores. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89% (95% CI, 82%-93%) at 23 years with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Competing-risks survivorship was 94% (95% CI, 91%%-96 %) at 23 years. At followup, the mean age of the patients was 84 years (range, 63-101 years), the mean flexion was 117° (range, 90°-130°), the mean American Knee Society score improved from a preoperative mean of 42 (range, 26-49) to 91 (range, 61-100; p < .001). Twenty-two knees in 21 patients (5.6%) were revised, most commonly because of polyethylene wear. CONCLUSIONS: ACL sacrifice may be an unnecessary concession during TKA. This study found satisfactory survivorship and function after more than 20 years of use for patients receiving a bicruciate-retaining TKA implant. A TKA that preserves cruciate ligaments provides a stable, well-functioning knee with a low likelihood of revision at long-term followup. Retaining both cruciate ligaments during knee arthroplasty is an attractive concept that is worth considering. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris.

This study assessed the results of 90 one-component revisions for failed hip resurfacing due to adverse reaction to metal wear debris (76 acetabular, 14 femoral). Patients with a femoral head size 40-45 mm (n=33) received a two-piece titanium meshed shell with a cross-linked polyethylene liner and patients with femoral head size 46-54 mm (n=43) received metal-on-metal components. Patients with femoral head size>45 mm who wished a metal-polyethylene bearing received a dual mobility femoral prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 61 months and the procedure was successful in 97% of the patients. Three failures required re-revision; there was one deep infection. There were no dislocations. One-component revision is a reasonable alternative to revision to total hip arthroplasty.

A comparison of the noise generated from different types of knee prostheses.

After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients may experience noise from their replaced knee. A prospective study was conducted with 465 (930 knees) patients to evaluate noise after bilateral TKA. A different randomly selected prosthesis was used on each side. The prostheses used were medial pivot (MP), anterior and posterior cruciate ligament retaining (ACL-PCL), posterior cruciate ligament retaining (PCL), posterior cruciate-substituting (PS), or mobile bearing (MB). The evaluation included the patients' responses to questions about noise after both their TKAs. Noise-related symptoms were reported by 12% of the patients with MP prostheses, 4% of patients with ACL-PCL, 31% of patients with PCL, 33% of patients with PS, and 42% of patients with MB. Occasionally, patients were concerned or dissatisfied with this phenomenon. Noise was less common with TKAs that used MP and ACL-PCL knee prostheses than with TKAs that used other prostheses.

A promising thumb Basal joint hemiarthroplasty for treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis is a painful, disabling condition that primarily affects women who are postmenopausal. Arthroplasty has been performed to treat this condition; however, subluxation has been a problem with all previous implants. We report the results of hemiarthroplasty using a prosthesis designed to address the problems associated with previous implants. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We wished to (1) determine if this prosthesis results in pain relief and functional improvement and preserves the appearance of the thumb, (2) assess the prosthetic reconstruction during followup, (3) assess complications that occur with the use of this prosthesis, and (4) determine the survivorship of this prosthesis. METHODS: We performed 159 basal joint hemiarthroplasties (138 patients) to treat osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. The mean age of the patients was 63 years, 78% were women, and all had Eaton-Littler Stage II or III changes. Only the damaged articular surfaces of the metacarpal and trapezium were excised; no tendon grafts or transfers were performed. Seven patients (seven thumbs) were lost to followup and seven (nine thumbs) died, leaving 124 patients (143 thumbs) for review. Clinical and radiographic assessments were made preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and annually thereafter. Minimum followup was 35 months (mean, 72.1 months; range, 35-120 months). RESULTS: At latest followup, pain relief occurred in 135 thumbs, function improved in 138 thumbs, 139 thumbs were excellent or good in overall assessment, and 142 thumbs had good or excellent cosmetic appearance. The mean tip pinch improved from 4.9 kg preoperatively to 6.44 kg postoperatively. Mean postoperative Buck-Gramcko score was 49 (excellent); overall Kaplan-Meier analysis with revision as the end point showed 94% implant survivorship at a mean followup of 72.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are superior to those of other implants and support continued use of this implant. Studies with longer followup are required to confirm these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.