ABSTRACT
The sensation of dry mouth also referred to as xerostomia is becoming increasingly common worldwide. Current treatment strategies include topical agents, sialagogues and saliva substitutes. The latter have been reported to be ineffective as special physicochemical features of natural saliva have so far been ignored (e.g., buffer capacity, osmolality, etc.). The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the most relevant physicochemical properties of three products frequently used in the clinics and compare them to unstimulated whole saliva (UWS). Sialin-Sigma®, Glandomed® and Xylitol CVS HealthTM Dry Mouth Spray were characterized regarding their pH, osmolality, electrical conductivity, buffer capacity, rheological behaviour, microstructure, surface tension and wettability and compared to UWS. The influence of residual saliva was examined under consideration of the conditions of xerostomia to assess whether the quantity given in the instruction for use is appropriate. All three products showed significant differences to UWS regarding the values received. Only Xylitol CVS HealthTM Dry Mouth Spray showed a comparable wettability. It could be further determined that the recommended doses were too low. These data can not only be used for an improved understanding of saliva, but also for the development of a replacement fluid to successfully alleviate xerostomia.
