Site-specific mutations in the myosin binding sites of actin affect structural transitions that control myosin binding.

We have examined the effects of actin mutations on myosin binding, detected by cosedimentation, and actin structural dynamics, detected by spectroscopic probes. Specific mutations were chosen that have been shown to affect the functional interactions of actin and myosin, two mutations (4Ac and E99A/E100A) in the proposed region of weak binding to myosin and one mutation (I341A) in the proposed region of strong binding. In the absence of nucleotide and salt, S1 bound to both wild-type and mutant actins with high affinity (K(d) < microM), but either ADP or increased ionic strength decreased this affinity. This decrease was more pronounced for actins with mutations that inhibit functional interaction with myosin (E99A/E100A and I341A) than for a mutation that enhances the interaction (4Ac). The mutations E99A/E100A and I341A affected the microsecond time scale dynamics of actin in the absence of myosin, but the 4Ac mutation did not have any effect. The binding of myosin eliminated these effects of mutations on structural dynamics; i.e., the spectroscopic signals from mutant actins bound to S1 were the same as those from wild-type actin. These results indicate that mutations in the myosin binding sites affect structural transitions within actin that control strong myosin binding, without affecting the structural dynamics of the strongly bound actomyosin complex.

Binding of dystrophin's tandem calponin homology domain to F-actin is modulated by actin's structure.

Dystrophin has been shown to be associated in cells with actin bundles. Dys-246, an N-terminal recombinant protein encoding the first 246 residues of dystrophin, includes two calponin-homology (CH) domains, and is similar to a large class of F-actin cross-linking proteins including alpha-actinin, fimbrin, and spectrin. It has been shown that expression or microinjection of amino-terminal fragments of dystrophin or the closely related utrophin resulted in the localization of these protein domains to actin bundles. However, in vitro studies have failed to detect any bundling of actin by either intact dystrophin or Dys-246. We show here that the structure of F-actin can be modulated so that there are two modes of Dys-246 binding, from bundling actin filaments to only binding to single filaments. The changes in F-actin structure that allow Dys-246 to bundle filaments are induced by covalent modification of Cys-374, proteolytic cleavage of F-actin's C-terminus, mutation of yeast actin's N-terminus, and different buffers. The present results suggest that F-actin's structural state can have a large influence on the nature of actin's interaction with other proteins, and these different states need to be considered when conducting in vitro assays.

Differences in structural dynamics of muscle and yeast actin accompany differences in functional interactions with myosin.

We have used spectroscopic probes ErIA and IAEDANS attached to Cys374 to compare the structural dynamics of yeast actin filaments with that of muscle actin, to understand the structural basis of the less productive interaction of yeast actin with myosin. Time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) of ErIA and steady-state fluorescence of IAEDANS were measured. TPA indicated more rapid rotational motion and more restricted angular amplitude in yeast actin. The fluorescence spectrum was less intense and more red-shifted in yeast actin, suggesting more exposure of the probe to solvent. These results indicate that the two actins differ substantially in the conformational dynamics of the C-terminal region. Binding of myosin S1 induced significantly different spectroscopic changes in TPA and fluorescence of muscle and yeast actin. As a result, the spectroscopic differences between the two actins were decreased by the addition of S1. These results suggest that yeast actin is less effective at activating myosin because of larger changes required in the structure of actin upon strong myosin binding. These results provide insight into the relationship between actomyosin dynamics and function, and they provide a useful framework for structure-function analysis of mutant yeast actin.

Perturbations of functional interactions with myosin induce long-range allosteric and cooperative structural changes in actin.

The role of the rotational dynamics of actin filaments in their interaction with myosin was studied by comparing the effect of myosin subfragment 1 (S1) with two other structural perturbations, which have substantial inhibitory effects on activation of myosin ATPase and in vitro motility of F-actin: (1) binding of the antibody fragment Fab(1-7) against the first seven N-terminal residues and (2) copolymerization with monomers treated with the zero-length cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide (EDC), referred to as EDC-actin. The rotational motion of actin was measured by time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) of erythrosin iodoacetamide (ErIA) attached to Cys 374 on actin. The binding of S1 in a rigor complex (no nucleotide) induced intramonomer (allosteric) and intermonomer (cooperative) structural changes that increased the residual anisotropy of labeled F-actin, indicating a conformational change in the region of the C terminus. Similar allosteric and cooperative changes were induced by binding of Fab(1-7) and by copolymerization of the ErIA-labeled actin monomers with EDC-actin. This suggests that the functional perturbations transform actin to a form resembling the rigor actomyosin complex. The correlation of the perturbation-induced changes in TPA of actin with the functional effects suggests that the actomyosin interaction can be inhibited by stabilization of actin in one of its structural intermediates.

Cooperativity in F-actin: binding of gelsolin at the barbed end affects structure and dynamics of the whole filament.

We have studied the effect of gelsolin, a Ca-dependent actin-binding protein, on the microsecond rotational dynamics of actin filaments, using time-resolved phosphorescence (TPA) and absorption anisotropy (TAA) of erythrosin iodoacetamide attached to Cys374 on actin. Polymerization of actin in the presence of gelsolin resulted in substantial increases in the rate and amplitude of anisotropy decay, indicating increased rotational motion. Analysis indicates that the effect of gelsolin cannot be explained by increased rates of overall (rigid-body) rotations of shortened filaments, but reflects changes in intra-filament structure and dynamics. We conclude that gelsolin induces (1) a 10 degrees change in the orientation of the absorption dipole of the probe relative to the actin filament, indicating a conformational change in actin, and (2) a threefold decrease in torsional rigidity of the filament. This result, which is consistent with complementary electron microscopic observations on the same preparations, directly demonstrates long-range cooperativity in F-actin, where a conformational change induced by the binding of a single gelsolin molecule to the barbed end is propagated along inter-monomer bonds throughout the actin filament.

Microsecond rotational dynamics of actin: spectroscopic detection and theoretical simulation.

We have investigated the microsecond rotational dynamics of F-actin with transient phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) spectroscopy, and analyzed the data to determine the relative contributions from rigid-body rotations and from intrafilament bending and twisting, using a theoretical model developed for DNA dynamics by Schurr and co-workers. The fits of the data to the model were constrained by independently determining the orientation of the dye's absorption dipole (by transient absorption anisotropy, TAA) and the actin filament length distribution (by electron microscopy). We conclude that (1) the Schurr theory enables calculation of the torsional flexibility of actin independent of any contribution from rigid body rotations of the whole filament, (2) the TPA decays cannot be explained by rigid-body or bending rotations, but reflect primary twisting motions within actin filaments, and (3) the dynamic properties of actin filaments are best ascribed to a continuous elasticity. This analysis establishes a firm methodological foundation for future studies of the effects or perturbations of the dynamics of actin on its functional properties.

Structural dynamics of F-actin: II. Cooperativity in structural transitions.

A large body of biochemical evidence suggests that the F-actin filament can have internal cooperativity. We have observed large cooperative effects on the low-resolution structure of actin filaments under three very different conditions. First, when G-Ca(2+)-actin is polymerized by both Mg2+ and KCl, filaments may be found in two different populations, with two discrete positions seen for subdomain 2. When G-Ca2+ actin is polymerized by only Mg2+, a single F-Mg(2+)-actin population is seen. The structural data suggest that an entire filament exists with subdomain 2 in one state or the other when there is a heterogenous mixture of Mg2+ and Ca(2+)-actin. Second, when actin filaments are nucleated from gelsolin there is a conformational change that can be observed throughout the filament that is consistent with a large shift in the actin C terminus. There must be a large cooperative propagation of this effect throughout the filament from the nucleation point. Third, we have used phalloidin to stabilize F-actin in which two C-terminal residues have been proteolytically removed by trypsin. It has been shown biochemically that this stabilization occurs at substoichiometric amounts of phalloidin. Phalloidin, at either a 1:1 or a 1:20 molar ratio with actin, restores the connectivity between the long-pitch helical strands. F-actin's internal cooperativity will have large implications in vivo, particularly in muscle.

Cooperativity in F-actin: chemical modifications of actin monomers affect the functional interactions of myosin with unmodified monomers in the same actin filament.

We have chemically modified a fraction of the monomers in actin filaments, and then measured the effects on the functional interaction of myosin with unmodified monomers within the same filament. Two modifications were used: (a) covalent attachment of various amounts of myosin subfragment-1 (S1) with the bifunctional reagent disuccinimidyl suberate and (b) copolymerization of unmodified actin monomers with monomers cross-linked internally with 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide. Each of these modifications abolished the interaction of the modified monomers with myosin, so the remaining interactions were exclusively with unmodified monomers. The two modifications had similar effects on the interaction of actin with myosin in solution: decreased affinity of myosin heads for unmodified actin monomers, without a change in the Vmax of actin-activated myosin ATPase activity. However, modification (b) produced much greater inhibition of actin sliding on a myosin-coated surface, as measured by an in vitro motility assay. These results provide insight into the functional consequences of cooperative interactions within the actin filament.

Mechanism of the active movement of actin: is actin sliding directly or indirectly related to binding with myosin and activation of myosin ATPase?

In the present work we examined the effect of crosslinking of polymerized and monomeric actin with glutaraldehyde, EDC and DSS on: 1) binding of actin to HMM in solution; 2) activation of HMM ATPase; 3) sliding movement of actin on glass-attached myosin; 4) properties of actin itself, like polymerizability and exchangeability of tightly bound nucleotide. The obtained data show that inhibition of sliding cannot be explained only by changes in the extent of activation of HMM ATPase and binding of actin to HMM; this result emphasizes the role of structural properties of actin in the mechanism of movement generation.

Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility.

The effects of crosslinking of monomeric and polymeric actin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and glutaraldehyde on the interaction with heavy meromyosin (HMM) in solution and on the sliding movement on glass-attached HMM were examined. The Vmax values of actin-activated HMM ATPase decreased in the following order: intact actin = EDC F-actin greater than DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than EDC G-actin. The affinity of actin for HMM in the presence of ATP decreased in the following order: DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than intact actin greater than EDC F-actin greater than EDC G-actin. However, sliding movement was inhibited only in the case of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked F and G-actin and EDC-crosslinked G-actin. Interestingly, after copolymerization of "non-motile" glutaraldehyde or EDC-crosslinked monomers with "motile" monomers of intact actin sliding of the copolymers was observed and its rate was independent of the type of crosslinked monomer, i.e. of the manner of their interaction with HMM. These data strongly indicate that inhibition of the sliding of actin by crosslinking cannot be explained entirely by changes in the Vmax value or affinity for myosin heads. We conclude that movement is generated by interaction of myosin with segments of F-actin containing a number of intact monomers, and the mechanism of inhibition involves an effect of the crosslinkers on the structure of F-actin itself.

The effect of cytochalasin and glutaraldehyde on F-actin filaments containing muscle and non-muscle tropomyosin.

F-actin filaments are disrupted by the action of cytochalasin and glutaraldehyde. Muscle tropomyosin which is able to polymerize can protect F-actin against fragmentation caused by these two agents. This protective effect does not occur with nonpolymerizable, brain or carboxy-peptidase A-treated skeletal muscle tropomyosins. The protection of F-actin against the action of cytochalasin and glutaraldehyde takes place under conditions where the F-actin filaments are saturated with tropomyosin, that is, at a molar ratio of tropomyosin to actin of 1:7. It is suggested that nonpolymerizable tropomyosin lacks the protective ability because its binding to F-actin is considerably weaker than the polymerizable tropomyosin and does not saturate all of the binding sites on F-actin.

Comparison of intermonomer interactions within polymers of chicken gizzard and rabbit skeletal muscle actins.

Comparison of interactions between the monomers of chicken gizzard and skeletal muscle actin revealed: 1. A more pronounced increase of the extent of polymerization of chicken gizzard than skeletal muscle actin with temperature, which resulted in higher positive changes of entropy and enthalpy of the former than of the latter species. 2. A difference in spectral changes accompanying polymerization: the changes at 295 nm, attibuted to environmental changes around tryptophan residues, were less pronounced for gizzard than for skeletal actin. 3. A difference in the amount of heavy meromyosin added to gizzard and to skeletal F-actin, with which the degree of flow birefringence of the acto-HMM complex is minimum: this amount was lower in the former than in the latter case. These results indicate quantitative differences between intermonomer interactions involved in polymerization of both actin species and also a possible difference in cooperativity between the monomers within the polymers of gizzard and skeletal actin.

Chicken-gizzard actin. Interaction with skeletal-muscle myosin.

Interaction of actin from chicken gizzard and from rabbit skeletal muscle with rabbit skeletal muscle myosin was compared by measuring the rate of superprecipitation, the activation of the Mg-ATPase and inhibition of K-ATPase activity of myosin and heavy meromyosin, and determination of binding of heavy meromyosin in the absence of ATP. Both the rate of superprecipitation of the hybrid actomyosin and the activation of myosin ATPase by gizzard actin are lower than those obtained with skeletal muscle actin. The activation of myosin Mg-ATPase by the two actin species also shows different dependence on substrate concentration: with gizzard actin the substrate inhibition starts at lower ATP concentration. The double-reciprocal plots of the Mg-ATPase activity of heavy meromyosin versus actin concentration yield the same value of the extrapolated ATPase activity at infinite actin concentration (V) for the two actins and nearly double the actin concentration needed to produce half-maximal activation (Kapp) in the case of gizzard actin. A corresponding difference in the abilities of the two actin species to inhibit the K-ATPase activity of heavy meromyosin in the absence of divalent cations was also observed. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of substitutions in the amino acid sequence of gizzard and skeletal muscle actins on their interaction with myosin.

Chicken-gizzard actin: polymerization and stability.

Preparations of chicken gizzard actin obtained from acetone-dried muscle powders prepared with various methods developed for skeletal muscle contain variable amounts of a beta-actinin-like protein. This contamination is minimized if the procedure of muscle powder preparation includes washing with EDTA solution, and can be completely removed by gel filtration of G-actin on Sephadex G-100. The presence of beta-actinin activity manifests itself in an increased rate of actin polymerization, low filament lengths resulting in low reduced viscosity and enhanced ATP-splitting activity of actin polymer, and instability of the polymer in the absence of free ATP. Gizzard actin purified on a Sephadex G-100 column does not differ from rabbit skeletal muscle actin in its polymerization properties. The distinct property of gizzard actin is the instability of its G form in the absence of added Ca2+, indicating that the affinity of this cation for the single high-affinity site in gizzard actin is lower than in skeletal muscle actin.

Effect of crosslinking by glutaraldehyde on interaction of F-actin with heavy meromyosin.

Crosslinking of F-actin by a bifunctional reagent glutaraldehyde resulted in a marked decrease of viscosity and length of F-actin filaments. The extent and rate of superprecipitation of actomyosin reconstituted from the modified actin were lower than those of unmodified actin-myosin complex, but activation of heavy meromyosin ATPase by the crosslinked actin was higher than by unmodified one. Heavy meromyosin ATPase activated by the crosslinked actin was distinctly less dependent on KCl concentration than that activated by unmodified actin. Turbidity of the modified acto-heavy meromyosin in the presence of ATP exceeded the sum of turbidities of actin and heavy meromyosin, whereas in the case of unmodified acto-heavy meromyosin the turbidity was comparable to that for noninteracting system. The difference in activation of heavy meromyosin. ATPase by the cross-linked and unmodified actin, clearly seen at room temperature, significantly diminished when temperature was lowered to 0 degrees C.