Socio-cognitive correlates of primary school children's deceptive behavior toward peers in competitive settings.

Competing for limited resources with peers is common among children from an early age, illustrating their propensity to use deceptive strategies to win. We focused on how primary school-age (6-8 years old) children's strategic deception toward peers is associated with their socio-cognitive development (theory of mind and executive functions). In a novel computerized competitive hide-and-seek game, we manipulated the peer opponents' familiarity (familiar vs. unfamiliar) and actions (following vs. not following children's indications), as well as the stimuli likability (liked vs. disliked cards). Our findings demonstrated that children deceived the familiar opponent less than the unfamiliar one, indicating their determination to preserve positive peer interactions. We showed that theory of mind and executive functions significantly predicted children's willingness to deceive. Notably, second-order false belief understanding and visuospatial working memory positively predicted children's use of truths to deceive, whereas inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility efficacy scores were negatively related to their deceptive performance when using the same strategy. Implications for children's competitive behavior toward peers involving lie-telling are discussed.

Interpretive Diversity Understanding, Parental Practices, and Contextual Factors Involved in Primary School-age Children's Cheating and Lying Behavior.

Dishonesty is an interpersonal process that relies on sophisticated socio-cognitive mechanisms embedded in a complex network of individual and contextual factors. The present study examined parental rearing practices, bilingualism, socioeconomic status, and children's interpretive diversity understanding (i.e., the ability to understand the constructive nature of the human mind) in relation to their cheating and lie-telling behavior. 196 school-age children (9-11 years old) participated in a novel trivia game-like temptation resistance paradigm to elicit dishonesty and to verify their interpretive diversity understanding. Results revealed that children's decision to cheat and lie was positively associated with their understanding of the constructive nature of the human mind and with parental rejection. Children with rejective parents were more likely to lie compared to their counterparts. This may suggest that understanding social interactions and the relationship with caregivers can impact children's cheating behavior and the extent to which they are willing to deceive about it. Understanding the constructive nature of the mind was also a positive predictor of children's ability to maintain their lies. Finally, being bilingual and having a higher socioeconomic status positively predicted children's deception, these intriguing results warranting further research into the complex network of deception influences.

Relationship between beliefs about medicines and adherence in elderly patients with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases: A cross-sectional study in Romania.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore elderly patients' beliefs about medicines in general, and specific towards their treatment and the relationship between beliefs and adherence. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by administering a questionnaire developed to meet the study's objectives. Elderly patients were recruited from three different settings. RESULTS: 167 patients agreed to participate to our study, having a mean age of 73 years. Patients were aware of the necessity for treatment, but they also showed concern over the potential for the adverse outcomes. Only 15% of the patients were completely accepting their treatment having high necessity and low concerns, while 40% were ambivalent, having high necessity beliefs, but also high concerns, with 89% being adherent in this group. Overall, higher adherence was significantly correlated with higher necessity and with higher necessity-concern differential. CONCLUSION: Patients beliefs have an impact on adherence, thus patients' concerns and necessities should be addressed in order to improve adherence and treatment outcome. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Higher necessity positively influenced adherence to treatment, suggesting the fact that healthcare professionals could improve patients' adherence by outlining and educating the patients on the necessity of the treatment, while also managing patients' concerns.