Liposomal amphotericin B and echinocandins as monotherapy or sequential or concomitant therapy in murine disseminated and pulmonary Aspergillus fumigatus infections.

Monotherapy and combination therapy were compared using optimal doses of liposomal amphotericin B, micafungin, or caspofungin in Aspergillus fumigatus pulmonary and disseminated infections. Mice were challenged intravenously (2.8 x 10(4) to 5.7 x 10(4) conidia) or intranasally (5.8 x 10(7) conidia) with A. fumigatus. Drugs (5, 10, or 15 mg/kg of body weight) were given for 3 or 6 days as single, concomitant, or sequential therapy (i.e., days 1 to 3 and then days 4 to 6). Mice were monitored for survival, and tissues were assayed for fungal burden and drug concentrations. Treatments starting 24 h postchallenge significantly prolonged survival in disseminated aspergillosis (P < 0.002), but only liposomal amphotericin B treatments or treatments beginning with liposomal amphotericin B increased survival to 100% in the pulmonary aspergillosis model. Fungi in kidneys and spleens (disseminated) and lungs (pulmonary) were significantly decreased (P < or = 0.04) by liposomal amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B plus echinocandin, or liposomal amphotericin B prior to echinocandin. In the disseminated infection, liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin (10 or 15 mg/kg) had similar kidney drug levels, while in the spleen, 5 and 15 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin B gave higher drug levels than micafungin (P < 0.02). In the pulmonary infection, drug levels in lungs and spleen with 5-mg/kg dosing were significantly higher with liposomal amphotericin B than with caspofungin (P < or = 0.002). In summary, treatment of A. fumigatus infections with liposomal amphotericin B plus echinocandin or liposomal amphotericin B prior to echinocandin was as effective as liposomal amphotericin B alone, and a greater decrease in the fungal burden with liposomal amphotericin B supports using liposomal amphotericin B prior to echinocandin.

Comparison of the physicochemical, antifungal, and toxic properties of two liposomal amphotericin B products.

Small unilamellar amphotericin B liposomes can reduce the toxicity of amphotericin B. In this study, we compared the physical, antifungal, pharmocokinetic, and toxic properties of two liposomal amphotericin B products, AmBisome and Anfogen, that have the same chemical composition but are manufactured differently. In vitro tests included determinations of the MICs and the concentrations causing the release of 50% of the intracellular potassium from red blood cells (K50 values) to assess toxicity. The 50% lethal dose (LD50) was evaluated by using uninfected C57BL/6 mice and single intravenous (i.v.) doses of 1 to 100 mg/kg of body weight. Multiple i.v. dosing over 18 days was performed with 0.5, 1.0, or 5.0 mg of Anfogen/kg or 1.0, 5.0, or 25 mg of AmBisome/kg to evaluate chronic toxicity. DBA/2 mice were infected intranasally with 2.5 x 10(6) Aspergillus fumigatus conidia, treated for 3 or 4 days with 3.0, 5.0, or 7.5 mg of Anfogen/kg or 3, 5, 7.5, or 15 mg of AmBisome/kg, and evaluated to assess the toxicity of the drugs to the kidneys (by measurement of blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels and histopathology) and the drug efficacy. The median particle size was 77.8 nm for AmBisome and 111.5 nm for Anfogen. In vitro K(50) values were significantly lower for Anfogen (0.9 mug/ml) than for AmBisome (20 microg/ml), and the LD50 of AmBisome was >100 mg/kg, versus 10 mg of Anfogen/kg. There was significant renal tubular necrosis in uninfected and infected mice given Anfogen but no tubular necrosis in AmBisome-treated mice. AmBisome at 7.5 or 15 mg/kg was also more efficacious than 7.5 mg of Anfogen/kg for the treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis, based on survival and weight loss data and numbers of CFU per gram of lung. In conclusion, the efficacy and toxicity of these two liposomal amphotericin B products were significantly different, and thus, the products were not comparable.

Effects of dosing regimen on accumulation, retention and prophylactic efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that effective prophylactic treatment of fungal infections would require adequate drug penetration and retention at potential infection sites. Using a mouse model, we examined liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) biodistribution, cell localization and retention in kidneys, lungs, liver and spleen to evaluate effective dosing regimens for prophylaxis of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans infections. METHODS: Following treatment of mice with cumulative doses of L-AmB (60-225 mg/kg), a bioassay was done to determine tissue drug concentrations 12 h to 6 weeks post-treatment. Immunohistochemical staining with anti-amphotericin B antibodies was used for cellular drug localization. Mice were treated prophylactically with 15-90 mg/kg L-AmB and challenged intravenously 1-7 days later with C. glabrata or they were given a total of 60 mg/kg as daily or intermittent dosing followed by intravenous challenge with C. albicans 3 or 6 weeks later. RESULTS: On the basis of microg/g tissue, the relative amount of drug was in the order spleen > liver > kidneys > lungs. Amphotericin B levels were maintained above the MIC for many fungi for 1 week in lungs and for as long as 6 weeks in kidneys and spleen. Drug localized in kidney tubular epithelial cells and in macrophages of liver and spleen. In prophylactic models, fungal burden was reduced by several 1000-fold or was undetectable within target tissues (kidneys, spleen). CONCLUSIONS: These observations underscore the importance of including drug tissue levels to obtain a better understanding of L-AmB efficacy. The sustained concentrations of bioactive AmB in many tissues provide a further rationale for investigating L-AmB prophylactic regimens.

Comparative efficacies, toxicities, and tissue concentrations of amphotericin B lipid formulations in a murine pulmonary aspergillosis model.

Invasive aspergillosis, an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed (IS) patients, is often treated with amphotericin B lipid formulations. In the present study, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) were compared in treatment of murine pulmonary aspergillosis. Uninfected, IS mice were treated for 4 days with 1, 4, 8, or 12 mg L-AMB or ABLC/kg of body weight, and their lungs were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for drug concentrations. IS mice intranasally challenged with Aspergillus fumigatus were treated with 12, 15, or 20 mg/kg L-AMB or ABLC and monitored for survival, fungal burden (CFU), and tissue drug concentration. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels and kidney histopathology were determined for uninfected and infected mice given 15 or 20 mg/kg L-AMB or ABLC. The results showed that both drugs had therapeutic levels of drug (>3.0 microg/g) in the lungs of uninfected or infected mice, and 24 h after the last dose, ABLC levels were significantly higher than L-AMB levels (P < 0.02). L-AMB and ABLC at 12 mg/kg both produced 57% survival, but only L-AMB at 15 or 20 mg/kg further increased survival to 80 to 90%, with BUN levels and kidney morphology similar to those of controls. Survival at 15 or 20 mg/kg ABLC was not significantly different than that of controls, and BUN levels were significantly elevated, with tubular alterations in uninfected animals and acute necrosis in kidney tubules of infected animals. In conclusion, although both drugs were effective in prolonging survival at 12 mg/kg, the reduced nephrotoxicity of L-AMB increased its therapeutic index, allowing for its safe and effective use at 15 or 20 mg/kg.

Treatment of Candida glabrata infection in immunosuppressed mice by using a combination of liposomal amphotericin B with caspofungin or micafungin.

While Candida albicans remains the most common Candida isolate, Candida glabrata accounts for approximately 15 to 20% of all Candida infections in the United States. In this study we used immunosuppressed mice infected with C. glabrata to investigate the efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B alone or in combination with the echinocandin caspofungin or micafungin. For monotherapy, mice were given six daily doses of liposomal amphotericin B (3 to 20 mg/kg of body weight), caspofungin (1 to 5 mg/kg), or micafungin (2.5 to 10 mg/kg). With concomitant therapy, mice received liposomal amphotericin B (7.5 mg/kg) in addition to caspofungin (2.5 mg/kg) or micafungin (2.5 mg/kg) for 6 days. For sequential therapy, liposomal amphotericin B was administered on days 1 to 3 and caspofungin or micafungin was given on days 4 to 6; conversely, caspofungin or micafungin was administered on days 1 to 3 and liposomal amphotericin B was given on days 4 to 6. Efficacy was based on the number of CFU per gram of kidney 21 days postchallenge. Monotherapy with liposomal amphotericin B (7.5 to 20 mg/kg) was significantly more effective than no drug treatment (control group) (P < 0.05) and demonstrated a dose-dependent response, with 20 mg/kg lowering the CFU/g from 6.3 to 4.2 (significantly different from the value for the control group [P < 0.001]). Monotherapy with all echinocandin doses lowered the CFU/g from 6.0 to 6.4 to 2.7 to 3.3 (significantly different from the value for the control group [P < 0.001]) with no dose-dependent response. Complete clearance of infection could be achieved only when liposomal amphotericin B was given either concomitantly with caspofungin or micafungin or if liposomal amphotericin B was given sequentially with caspofungin. In conclusion, the combination of liposomal amphotericin B with an echinocandin markedly improved the therapeutic outcome in murine C. glabrata systemic infection.

Alternative dosing regimens of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) effective in treating murine systemic candidiasis.

OBJECTIVES: This study was done to determine whether high dose AmBisome (4-20 mg/kg), given intermittently, could reduce the frequency of dosing needed to treat murine systemic candidiasis when compared with conventional daily treatment. METHODS: Mice were immunosuppressed with cyclophosphamide every 3 days, beginning day -3 before challenge with log(10) 5.0 cfu Candida albicans. Treatment was begun 48-72 h post-challenge with daily or intermittent dose regimens of AmBisome, followed by determination of kidney cfu for up to 1 month post-treatment. RESULTS: A single AmBisome dose of 4 mg/kg was as effective as four daily, 1 mg/kg treatments. A total of 8 mg/kg, given as 4 mg/kg on days 2 and 4, or as 5 mg/kg on day 2 followed by 1 mg/kg on days 3, 4, and 5, also produced comparable efficacy. While 20 mg/kg given day 2, 4 and 6 post-challenge as a 1 week loading dose, followed by one 10 mg/kg treatment on day 13, decreased the fungal burden by up to 5 logs compared with controls (log(10) 2.3 cfu/g and log(10) 7.5 cfu/g, respectively), 20 mg/kg given Monday, Wednesday and Friday for 5 weeks, reduced the fungal burden to undetectable levels (i.e. log(10) 1.0 cfu). CONCLUSIONS: Significant reduction or clearance of kidney cfu, following intermittent, high dose AmBisome treatment, indicated that non-daily dosing regimens could be successfully used instead of conventional daily dosing to treat established C. albicans infection in immunosuppressed mice.

Effect of tissue penetration on AmBisome efficacy.

Amphotericin B reformulated into the liposomal formulation known as AmBisome (amphotericin B, hydrogenated soy phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol) can be safely administered at dosages 15 times higher than the conventional drug with the same broad spectrum of activity. Increased doses demonstrate non-linear clearance with saturation of the reticuloendothelial system (RES) and redistribution of the drug into non-RES tissues. The efficacy of this liposomal amphotericin B formulation appears to be related both to improved tissue penetration in the lungs, brain, kidneys, liver and spleen along with sustained bioactivity of therapeutic drug levels in these target tissues.

AmBisome: liposomal formulation, structure, mechanism of action and pre-clinical experience.

Amphotericin B is the treatment of choice for life-threatening systemic fungal infections such as candidosis and aspergillosis. To improve this drug's efficacy and reduce its acute and chronic toxicities, several lipid formulations of the drug have been developed, including AmBisome, a liposomal formulation of amphotericin B. The liposome is composed of high transition temperature phospholipids and cholesterol, designed to incorporate amphotericin B securely into the liposomal bilayer. AmBisome can bind to fungal cell walls, where the liposome is disrupted. The amphotericin B, after being released from the liposomes, is thought to transfer through the cell wall and bind to ergosterol in the fungal cell membrane. This mechanism of action of AmBisome results in its potent in vitro fungicidal activity while the integrity of the liposome is maintained in the presence of mammalian cells, for which it has minimal toxicity. In animal models, AmBisome is effective in treating both intracellular (leishmaniasis and histoplasmosis) and extracellular (candidosis and aspergillosis) systemic infections. Because of its low toxicity at the organ level, intravenous AmBisome can be safely delivered at markedly high doses of amphotericin B (1-30 mg/kg) for the treatment of systemic fungal infections. AmBisome has a circulating half-life of 5-24 h in animals, and in animal models appears to localize at sites of infection in the brain (cryptococcosis, aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis), lungs (blastomycosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, aspergillosis) and kidneys (candidosis), delivering amphotericin B that remains bioavailable in tissues for several weeks following treatment.