Preoperative urine culture with contaminants is not associated with increased risk for urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic stone treatment.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess whether the presence of contaminants in the pre-operative urine culture (preop-UC) predicts postoperative urinary tract infection (postop-UTI) in patients undergoing elective ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from 01/2019 to 12/2021 examining patients with unilateral stone burden ≤ 2 cm who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy and had a preop-UC within 3 months. Positive, negative, contaminated, and polymicrobial definitions for UCs were established in accordance with current guidelines. Patients with positive and polymicrobial cultures were excluded. Postop-UTI was defined as the presence of urinary symptoms and a positive UC within 30 days of the procedure. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate risk factors for contamination in the preop-UC and the risk of postop-UTI. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients met the inclusion-exclusion criteria. Preop-UC was negative in 153 patients and contaminated in 48 patients. Significant contaminant-related factors included female gender and increased BMI. Postop-UTI was diagnosed in 3.2% of patients with negative preop-UCs and 4.2% of patients with contaminants, with no difference between groups (p = 0.67). The regression model determined that the presence of contaminants in preop-UC failed to predict postop-UTI (OR 0.69, p = 0.64). CONCLUSION: The presence of contaminants in preop-UCs is not associated with an increased risk of postop-UTIs after ureteroscopy. Our study supports that contaminants in the preop-UC can be interpreted as a negative UC in terms of postop-UTI risk stratification. Preoperative antibiotics should not be prescribed for patients undergoing uncomplicated ureteroscopy for stone surgery in the setting of a contaminated preop-UC.

Impact of Renal Access Angle and Speed of Nephroscope Retrieval Movements on the Vortex Effect.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of different renal access angles (AAs) and nephroscope retrieval speeds on the efficacy of the vortex effect (VE) in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL). This study aimed to understand the poorly understood physical components of the VE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Pexiglas™ (KUS®) model was built based on the dimensions of a 15/16 F mini-PCNL set (Karl Storz). The flow rate was continuous via an automatic pump and calibrated to achieve hydrodynamic equivalence to the real equipment. One experiment consisted of manually retrieving all 30 stone phantoms (3 mm diameter) utilizing only the VE. Cumulative time to retrieve all stones was measured. An accelerometer recorded instant speeds of the nephroscope every 0.08 seconds (s), and 3 experiments were performed at each angle (0°, 45°, and 90°). A logistic regression model was built utilizing maximum speeds and access angles to predict the effectiveness of the VE. RESULTS: Mean cumulative time for complete stone retrieval was 28.1 seconds at 0° vs 116.5 seconds at 45° vs 101.4 seconds at 90° (P < .01). We noted significantly higher speeds at 0° compared to 45° and 90° (P < .01); however, differences in average and maximum speed between 45° and 90° were not statistically significant (P = .21 and P = .25, respectively). The regression model demonstrated a negative association between increasing maximum speed and VE's effectiveness (OR 0.547, CI 95% 0.350-0.855, P < .01). When controlling for maximum speed, the 0° angle had significantly higher chances of achieving at least a partially effective VE. CONCLUSION: Increasing the renal access angle or nephroscope extraction speed negatively impacts the effectiveness of the VE. This significantly increased procedure time in the laboratory model, suggesting that the VE is less effective at higher sheath angles.

The Vortex Effect in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the physical principles of the vortex effect to better understand its applicability in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) procedures. METHODS: Two acrylic phantom models were built based on the cross-sectional area (CSA) ratio of a MIP nephroscope and access sheaths (15/16F and 21/22F MIP-M, Karl Storz). The nephroscope phantom was 10 mm in diameter. The access sheaths had diameters of 14 mm (CSA ratio: 0.69) and 20 mm (CSA ratio: 0.30). The models were adapted to generate hydrolysis, and hydrogen bubbles enhanced flow visualization on a green laser background. After calibration, the experimental flow rate was set to 12.0 mL/s. Three 30-second trials assessing the flow were performed with each model. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were completed to determine the speed and pressure profiles. RESULTS: In both models, as the incoming fluid from the nephroscope phantom attempted to move toward the collecting system, a stagnation point was demonstrated. No fluid entered the collecting system phantom. Utilizing the 14 mm sheath, we observed a random generation of several vortices and a pressure gradient (PG) of 114.4 N/m2 between the nephroscope's tip and stagnation point. In contrast, examining the 20 mm sheath revealed a significantly smaller PG (19.4 N/m2) and no noticeable vortices were noted. CONCLUSION: The speed of the fluid and equipment geometry regulate the PG and the vortices field, which are responsible for the production of the vortex effect. Considering the same flow rate, a higher ratio between the CSA of the nephroscope and access sheath results in improved efficacy of the vortex effect.

Optimizing stone harvesting in miniaturized-PCNL: a critical examination of renal access angles, technology, and the role they play in operative efficiency.

PURPOSE: Stone retrieval can be a laborious aspect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A unique phenomenon of mini-PCNL is the vortex-effect (VE), a hydrodynamic form of stone retrieval. Additionally, the vacuum-assisted sheath (VAS) was recently developed as a new tool for stone extraction. The purpose of our study is to investigate the impact of renal access angle (as a surrogate for patient positioning) on stone retrieval efficiency and compare the efficiency among methods of stone retrieval. METHODS: A kidney model was filled with 3 mm artificial stones. Access to the mid-calyx was obtained using a 15Fr sheath. Stones were retrieved over three minutes at angles of 0°, 25°, and 75° utilizing the VE, VAS, and basket. Stones were weighed for comparison of stones/retraction and stones/minute. Trials were repeated three times at each angle. RESULTS: Renal access angle of 0° was associated with increased stone retrieval for both the VE and VAS (p < 0.05). The VE was the most effective method for stones retrieved per individual retraction at an angle of 0° (p < 0.005), although when analyzed as stones retrieved per minute, the VE and VAS were no longer statistically different (p = 0.08). At 75°, none of the methods were statistically different, regardless if analyzed as stones per retraction or per minute (p = 0.20-0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Renal access angle of 0° is more efficient for stone retrieval than a steep upward angle. There is no difference in stone retrieval efficiency between the VE and VAS methods, although both are superior to the basket at lower sheath angles.