Validation of the 2023 International Diagnostic Criteria for MOGAD in a Selected Cohort of Adults and Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To test the performance of the 2023 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) criteria in adults and children with inflammatory demyelinating conditions who were tested for MOG antibodies (Abs). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients tested for MOG-Abs from 2018 to 2022 in 2 specialist hospitals. The inclusion criteria comprised ≥1 attendance in an adult or pediatric demyelinating disease clinic and complete clinical and MRI records. The final clinical diagnosis of MOGAD, made by the treating neurologist, was taken as the benchmark against which the new criteria were tested. The international MOGAD diagnostic criteria were applied retrospectively; they stipulate at least 1 clinical or MRI supporting feature for MOGAD diagnosis in positive fixed MOG cell-based assay without a titer. The performance MOG-Ab testing alone for MOGAD diagnosis was also assessed and compared with that of MOGAD criteria using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Of the 1,879 patients tested for MOG-Abs, 539 (135 pediatric and 404 adults) met the inclusion criteria. A clinical diagnosis of MOGAD was made in 86/539 (16%) patients (37 adults, 49 children), with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. The MOGAD diagnostic criteria had sensitivity of 96.5% (adults 91.9%, children 100%), specificity of 98.9% (adults 98.8%, children 98.9%), positive predictive value of 94.3% (adults 89.4%, children 98%), negative predictive value of 99.3% (adults 99.2%, children 100%), and accuracy of 98.5% (adults 98.3%, children 99.2%). When compared with MOG-Ab testing alone, a difference was seen only in adults: a significantly higher specificity (98.9% vs 95.6%, p = 0.0005) and nonstatistically significant lower sensitivity (91.9% vs 100%, p = 0.08). DISCUSSION: The international MOGAD diagnostic criteria exhibit high performance in selected patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases (who had a high pretest probability of having MOGAD) compared with best clinical judgment; their performance was better in children than in adults. In adults, the MOGAD criteria led to an improvement in specificity and positive predictive value when compared with MOG-Ab testing alone, suggesting that the requirement of at least 1 clinical or MRI supporting feature is important. Future work should address the generalizability of the diagnostic criteria to cohorts of greater clinical diversity seen within neurologic settings.

Lessons of the month 2: Connecting the clues: limb swelling and pain.

A 28-year-old man presented with a sudden onset of left leg pain and swelling. There was no history of preceding trauma. Initial blood tests were unremarkable, ultrasound imaging showed extensive subcutaneous oedema. He then developed similar symptoms in his right leg, followed by both arms, and finally his forehead. A fluctuating peripheral eosinophilia subsequently developed. Biopsies of the arm and forehead showed an evolving panniculitis. The clinical features, peripheral eosinophilia, imaging and histology were consistent with a diagnosis of eosinophilic fasciitis. The patient received a course of steroids with complete resolution of his symptoms. Eosinophilic fasciitis is an uncommon condition but one that may be encountered by acute physicians. Early recognition and treatment is important to prevent complications.