ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of gynecological malignancy in menopausal women who develop tubo-ovarian abscesses (TOAs), and to address the differences in presentation and underlying pathology between premenopausal and postmenopausal women with TOAs. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective study we included 93 patients with a diagnosis of a TOA and compared a premenopausal group (group 1) with a postmenopausal group (group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 included 76 (82%), and group 2 17 (18%) patients. Abdominal pain and pyrexia >38 degrees C were present in 93 and 74% cases of group 1, and in 71 and 41% cases of group 2 (P=0.016 and 0.019, respectively). Irregular vaginal bleeding and gross ascites were significantly more frequent in group 2. With respect to benign additional pathology we found no differences between the two groups. On the contrary a significant association between TOAs in menopause and malignancy was established. In 8 (47%) postmenopausal cases a concomitant gynecological malignancy was found including a variety of cancers. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women presenting with TOAs, should be thoroughly investigated to exclude a concomitant pelvic malignancy. Conservative treatment of TOAs has no place during the menopause.
Subject(s)
Abscess/complications , Fallopian Tube Diseases/complications , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Ovarian Diseases/complications , Postmenopause , Abdominal Pain , Abscess/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Fallopian Tube Diseases/diagnosis , Fallopian Tube Diseases/surgery , False Negative Reactions , Female , Fever , Genital Neoplasms, Female/complications , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy , Middle Aged , Ovarian Diseases/diagnosis , Ovarian Diseases/surgery , Premenopause , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE(S): To present our 10 years experience in the management of ureteric injuries occurring during gynecological surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-six patients had a variety of injuries. In 29 cases, the ureteric damage was diagnosed intraoperatively. Management of early-diagnosed injuries included suturing, ligature removal, end-to-end anastomosis, and reimplantation of the ureter. In 47 cases, the injury was diagnosed postoperatively. Ureteric catheterization was attempted in all cases presenting with obstruction. Catheterization failures were managed with ureterolysis, and reimplantation. Small ureteric fistula were managed with catheterization, and large communications with reimplantation. Two cases with urinomas were treated with surgical evacuation and anastomoses. RESULTS: Management of early-diagnosed injuries was relatively easy in most cases. Postoperatively-diagnosed injuries were more difficult to treat. Catheterization failed in 28/44 (65.9%) ureters and surgical re-exploration was necessary. Long-term morbidity was minimal and no relapses occurred. CONCLUSION(S): Early recognition of a ureteric injury is the key to a complications-free repair. Unrecognized injuries cause prolonged morbidity, and their management can be difficult. Treatment of these injuries by experienced teams may minimize long-term consequences.
