Compression Therapy in Dermatology. / Terapia compresiva en Dermatología.

The benefit of lower limb compression therapy is not limited to chronic venous insufficiency or/and lymphoedema. Thanks to its anti-edema and anti-inflammatory effects, compression therapy is considered a beneficial adjuvant therapy to treat atypical wounds, inflammatory dermatoses, cellulitis, and traumatic wounds in the absence of contraindications. Strict contraindications are limited to severe peripheral arterial disease and decompensated heart failure. The variability of commercially available compression materials and systems, such as short-stretch bandages, multi-component systems, zinc oxide bandages, medical adaptive compression systems, ulcer compression stockings or medical compression stockings, facilitates the adaptation of compression therapy to the individual needs of each patient. Compared to venous leg ulcers, low pressures of 20mmHg are often sufficient to treat dermatological disorders, with higher patient tolerance and compliance.

[Classification and nomenclature of current materials for compression therapy]. / Einteilung und Nomenklatur der aktuellen Materialien zur Kompressionstherapie.

Compression therapy has been an essential part of conservative therapy for people with chronic wounds and edema of the lower extremities for hundreds of years. The initiated therapy can be divided into the decongestion phase, maintenance phase, and prevention. The choice of the respective compression materials is based, among other factors, on these phases, the clinical stage and symptoms, the needs of the affected person and their physical abilities. Today, a wide range of different materials and methods are available for compression therapy. Thus, it is increasingly difficult to keep an overview of these treatment options, especially since the nomenclature used by the manufacturers is often inconsistent. Thus, the materials and methods for compression therapy currently available in German-speaking countries and their clinical indications are described in this review article. In addition, a uniform nomenclature is proposed, on the basis of which an appropriate exchange between all those involved in the care of people with compression therapy is guaranteed.

[Compression bandages with and without padding : Observational controlled survey of pressure and comfort]. / Kompressionsverbände mit und ohne Unterpolsterung : Eine kontrollierte Beobachtungsstudie zu Kompressionsdruck und Tragekomfort.

BACKGROUND: In the context of compression therapy, padded bandages are designed to prevent skin damage, increase adherence and support the success of therapy. Routine use is discussed, because comparative studies are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study examines effectiveness, comfort, and impact of short-stretch bandages without padding compared to underpadded bandages. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In all, 61 healthy participants wore padded bandages foam or synthetic cotton wool on one leg and nonpadded bandages on the other. On both sides, a resting pressure of 50 mm Hg was generated. After 60 min resting pressure, skin condition, comfort, pain, and fitting of the bandages were assessed. RESULTS: All bandages showed pressure losses after 1 h; 82.0% of nonpadded bandages had a pressure drop of 9 mm Hg or more. The following were observed in unpadded bandages: constrictions (100.0%), severe redness (77.0%) and bruises (42.6%). Comfort was rated as pleasant by 3.3% without padding, by 83.9% with foam padding, and by 73.3% with synthetic cotton wool padding. Nonpadded compression bandages caused in 62.3% pain from 1-3 (numerical rating scale 0-10). CONCLUSIONS: Padded compression bandages maintain the therapy-relevant pressure better, provide more comfort, and cause less pain and skin problems than nonpadded compression bandages. These aspects are crucial for adherence, and therapeutic success. After 1 h of use on the healthy leg, there were obvious differences. Significantly more side effects may appear after several hours of use on previously damaged skin. Therefore, compression bandages should always be padded.

[Compression therapy of chronic leg ulcers : Practical aspects]. / Kompressionstherapie des chronischen Ulcus cruris : Praxisrelevante Aspekte.

Compression therapy, together with modern moist wound treatment, is the basis for a successful conservative treatment of patients with chronic leg ulcers. In clinical practice, it is often the patients themselves who apply compression therapies. Many of the mostly elderly patients, however, are not able to reach their legs and feet due to movement restrictions, such as arthritis, arthrosis and even obesity. An adequate compression therapy also requires extensive experience and regular training. In practice only the minority of patients can perform bandaging well and therefore this should not be recommended. Self-management with do-it-yourself medical devices will become more and more important in the future. In addition to the psychological factors, cost aspects and demographic change, an expected lack of qualified nursing staff due to the number of elderly patients who are potentially in need of care means that self-management is becoming increasingly more important. For the essentially important compression therapy of patients with chronic leg ulcers, there already exist various therapy options. The needs, preferences and abilities of the patients concerned can be considered when selecting the appropriate system. Particularly for the self-management of compression therapy, adaptive compression bandages are suitable for patients with leg ulcers during the initial decompression phase and ulcer stocking systems in the subsequent maintenance phase.

[Compression devices for decongestion therapy : A cross-sectional observational survey of handling, pressure, and comfort]. / Kompressionsmittel für die Entstauungstherapie : Vergleichende Erhebung im Querschnitt zu Handhabung, Anpressdruck und Tragegefühl.

BACKGROUND: If compression bandaging is not performed in a professional manner, the objectives of the therapy may not be achieved and side effects or complications may result. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional observational survey examines the handling of the treatment options: short-stretch bandages with padding, multicomponent compression systems, and adaptive compression bandages. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: During several training sessions on the topic of compression therapy, 137 participants performed compression bandagings on each other. In this regard, they were asked to achieve a predetermined pressure range (short-stretch bandages: 50-60 mm Hg, multicomponent compression systems: 40-50 mm Hg, adaptive compression bandage: 35-45 mm Hg). To evaluate the efficiency, the time used for application, the achieved pressure value, and the comfort were determined. RESULTS: Of the 302 bandagings (n = 137 participants), 28.4% lay within the given target pressure value range. This included 11.2% of performed short-stretch bandages, 35.2% of multicomponent compression systems, and 85.0% of adaptive compression bandages. Significant differences in the mean deviations are found between the treatment options. The bandage was described as being comfortable by 37.7% of users of short-stretch bandages with padding, by 65.0% of those wearing a multicomponent compression system, and by 94.6% of participants with an adaptive compression bandage. CONCLUSIONS: In practice, short-stretch bandages are still the most frequently used care option for the creation of a phlebological compression bandage. In this survey, they proved to be unsafe, time-consuming, and uncomfortable in relation to other treatment options. Multicomponent compression systems and adaptive compression bandages are treatment options that may be a contemporary alternative which also bares more comfort for the patient.

[German national consensus on wound documentation of leg ulcer : Part 2: Routine care - classification of variable characteristics]. / Nationaler Konsensus zur Wunddokumentation beim Ulcus cruris : Teil 2: Routineversorgung ­ Klassifikation der Variablenausprägungen.

BACKGROUND: Standards in the assessment and documentation of disease processes are the basis of guideline-based care. For the treatment of chronic wounds, especially leg ulcers, no approved parameters are available. OBJECTIVES: Against this background, our aim was to develop standards for the documentation of leg ulcer in routine care. This article presents the recommendations for the classification and characteristics of the variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development of the documentation standard was based on a systematic literature research and was performed in a Delphi-based consensus process. The national consensus process included meetings as well as web-based questionnaires. The Consensus Group is coordinated by the German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm). RESULTS: The documentation standards and their variables for leg ulcer routine care were developed in seven meetings of the consensus group. The consensus group consists of 38 delegates of wound care societies, health insurances, wound networks and associations. DISCUSSION: For each variable, recommended in routine care, a distinct response scheme (defined set of variable characteristics) was defined. As a next step, a structured implementation process is required, which was part of the resolutions of the consensus group.

[German national consensus on wound documentation of leg ulcer : Part 1: Routine care - standard dataset and minimum dataset]. / Nationaler Konsensus zu Wunddokumentation beim Ulcus cruris : Teil 1: Routineversorgung ­ "Standard-Dataset" und "Minimum-Dataset".

BACKGROUND: Standards for basic documentation and the course of treatment increase quality assurance and efficiency in health care. To date, no standards for the treatment of patients with leg ulcers are available in Germany. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to develop standards under routine conditions in the documentation of patients with leg ulcers. This article shows the recommended variables of a "standard dataset" and a "minimum dataset". MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consensus building among experts from 38 scientific societies, professional associations, insurance and supply networks (n = 68 experts) took place. After conducting a systematic international literature research, available standards were reviewed and supplemented with our own considerations of the expert group. From 2012-2015 standards for documentation were defined in multistage online visits and personal meetings. RESULTS: A consensus was achieved for 18 variables for the minimum dataset and 48 variables for the standard dataset in a total of seven meetings and nine online Delphi visits. The datasets involve patient baseline data, data on the general health status, wound characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, patient reported outcomes, nutrition, and education status. DISCUSSION: Based on a multistage continuous decision-making process, a standard in the measurement of events in routine care in patients with a leg ulcer was developed.

[Compression therapy in leg ulcers]. / Kompressionstherapie des Ulcus cruris.

Compression therapy is well-tried treatment with only few side effects for most patients with leg ulcers and/or edema. Despite the very long tradition in German-speaking countries and good evidence for compression therapy in different indications, recent scientific findings indicate that the current situation in Germany is unsatisfactory. Today, compression therapy can be performed with very different materials and systems. In addition to the traditional bandaging with Unna Boot, short-stretch, long-stretch, or multicomponent bandage systems, medical compression ulcer stockings are available. Other very effective but far less common alternatives are velcro wrap systems. When planning compression therapy, it is also important to consider donning devices with the patient. In addition to compression therapy, intermittent pneumatic compression therapy can be used. Through these various treatment options, it is now possible to develop an individually accepted, geared to the needs of the patients, and functional therapy strategy for nearly all patients with leg ulcers.

Effectiveness of advanced versus conventional wound dressings on healing of chronic wounds: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Wound dressings are essential in the treatment of chronic wounds and should be selected on valid and recent evidence. OBJECTIVE: Effectiveness of advanced compared to conventional dressings for chronic wound healing. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search, systematic review and meta-analyses of the results of advanced dressing studies on chronic wound treatment. Comprehensiveness and coverage of all relevant studies is the most striking difference in relation to other meta-analyses and systematic reviews. RESULTS: The mean odds ratio of complete healing was 1.52 favouring advanced over conventional dressings in 65 controlled trials. In 287 study conditions including uncontrolled studies, mean odds were 0.97 (advanced dressings/controlled studies), 0.77 (conventional/controlled) and 0.47 (advanced/uncontrolled). The overall healing rate was 33%. When causal treatment was applied, a reduced effect was observed. The consideration of all types of chronic wounds, advanced wound dressings and studies resulted in more study effects, more reliable estimates of mean effects and more statistical power. These differences in the design are likely to explain the differences in the meta-analytic results. CONCLUSION: A general superiority of advanced dressings on complete healing was shown. The generalizability of the results is limited by the methodological and report quality within studies identified, unexplained heterogeneity in study effects and possibly by publication bias.