The comparative plasma pharmacokinetics of intravenous cefpodoxime sodium and oral cefpodoxime proxetil in beagle dogs.

The pharmacokinetic properties of cefpodoxime, and its prodrug, cefpodoxime proxetil, were evaluated in two separate studies, one following intravenous (i.v.) administration of cefpodoxime sodium and the second after oral (p.o.) administration of cefpodoxime proxetil to healthy dogs. After cefpodoxime administration, serial blood samples were collected and plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A single i.v. administration of cefpodoxime sodium at a dose of 10 mg cefpodoxime/kg body weight resulted in a cefpodoxime average maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 91 (+/-17.7) microg/mL, measured at 0.5 h after drug administration, an average half-life (t1/2) of 4.67 (+/-0.680) h, an average AUC(0-infinity) of 454 (+/-83.1) h.microg/mL, an average V(d(ss)) of 151 (+/-27) mL/kg, an average Cl(B) of 22.7 (+/-4.2) mL/h/kg and an average MRT(0-infinity) of 5.97 (+/-0.573) h. When dose normalized to 10 mg cefpodoxime/kg body weight, cefpodoxime proxetil administered orally resulted in Cmax of 17.8 +/- 11.4 microg/mL for the tablet formulation and 20.1 +/- 6.20 microg/mL for the suspension formulation and an average AUC(0-LOQ) of 156 (+/-76.1) h.microg/mL for the tablet formulation and 162 (+/-48.6) h.microg/mL for the suspension formulation. Relative bioavailability of the two oral formulations was 1.04 (suspension compared with tablet), whereas the absolute bioavailability of both oral formulations was estimated to be approximately 35-36% in the cross-study comparison with the i.v. pharmacokinetics. Combined with previous studies, these results suggest that a single daily oral dose of 5-10 mg cefpodoxime/kg body weight as cefpodoxime proxetil maintains plasma concentrations effective for treatment of specified skin infections in dogs.

Concentrations of progesterone in milk of cows administered an intravaginal progesterone insert.

Milk from pregnant cows contains concentrations of progesterone (P4) considered safe for human consumption. The objective of this study was to determine if concentrations of P4 in milk during administration of an intravaginal progesterone insert (CIDR insert) are less than concentrations of P4 in milk associated with pregnancy. Results have implications for human use of milk from cows receiving CIDR inserts. Holstein cows (N = 64; > 40 and < 150 d after calving) were administered 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (study d 0) and 20 cows detected in estrus from 2 to 4 d later were assigned randomly to either control (N = 10; no further treatment) or CIDR insert (N = 10; 1.38 g of P4) inserted on study d 17 (14 +/- 1 d after estrus) and removed 7 d later. Composite milk samples were collected contemporaneously from each of the 20 estrous cycling cows and from 10 pregnant cows (> or = 60 and < or = 220 d of gestation) twice daily from study d 17 to 27. Concentrations of P4 in defatted milk samples were quantified using a validated radioimmunoassay. Mean logs of areas under the curve of concentrations of P4 from the afternoon on study d 17 through the afternoon on study d 27 were 3.05 ng day/ml for control, 3.33 ng day/ml for CIDR insert, and 3.81 ng day/ml for pregnant cows. Therefore, increased P4 due to pregnancy was 0.76 ng day/ml (3.81-3.05), whereas the increase in P4 due to CIDR insert was only 0.28 ng day/ml (3.33-3.05). Applying a 95% confidence interval to 0.28 ng day/ml provided an upper value of 0.70 ng day/ml, lower than the increase due to pregnancy. Because milk from pregnant cows is considered safe for human consumption, it follows that milk from cows administered CIDR inserts should also be considered safe, based on concentrations of P4.

Evidence that cynomolgus monkey cholesteryl ester transfer protein has two neutral lipid binding sites.

Two inhibitors of cynomolgus monkey cholesteryl ester transfer protein were evaluated. One, a monoclonal antibody made against purified cynomolgus monkey cholesteryl ester transfer protein, was capable of severely inhibiting triglyceride transfer, but had a variable effect on cholesteryl ester transfer. At low antibody to antigen ratios, there was what appeared to be a stoichiometric inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer, but at high antibody to antigen ratios the inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer was completely relieved, even though triglyceride transfer remained blocked. Fab fragments of the antibody had no effect whatsoever on cholesteryl ester transfer, but were capable of completely blocking triglyceride transfer. The other inhibitor, 6-chloromecuric cholesterol, severely inhibited cholesteryl ester transfer with minimal inhibition of triglyceride transfer. When both inhibitors were added to the assay, both cholesteryl ester and triglyceride transfer were inhibited; an indication that the inhibitors did not compete for the same binding site on cholesteryl ester transfer protein. When the antibody was given subcutaneously to cynomolgus monkeys at a dose which inhibited triglyceride transfer in the plasma by more than 90%, there was no detectable effect on the high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, but the HDL triglyceride levels decreased from 13 +/- 2 to 1 +/- 0 mol/mol of HDL (mean +/- S.D.); an indication that the antibody uncoupled cholesteryl ester and triglyceride transfer in vivo. The 6-chloromecuric cholesterol could not be evaluated in vivo because it is a potent lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor. The fact that cholesteryl ester transfer can be inhibited without effect on triglyceride transfer and, conversely, that triglyceride transfer can be inhibited without effect on cholesteryl ester transfer indicates that these two lipids are not transferred by a single, non-discriminatory process.