Daily Breastmilk Volume in Mothers of Very Low Birth Weight Neonates: A Repeated-Measures Randomized Trial of Hand Expression Versus Electric Breast Pump Expression.

BACKGROUND: There are no randomized trials comparing early exclusive hand expression (HE) with early exclusive electric pump expression (electric expression [EE]) for milk removal in mothers of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Mothers of VLBW infants were randomized to exclusively HE or EE for the first 7 days postpartum. Daily volumes of milk were compared between groups for the first 28 days, adjusting for repeated measures. RESULTS: The HE (n=12) and the EE (n=14) groups did not differ with respect to age, parity, single versus multiple gestation, or number of expression sessions per day. There were 728 values for daily milk volumes in the first 28 days, including 105 HE and 623 EE. Mothers using exclusive HE had significantly (p<0.05) less cumulative daily milk production throughout the first 7 days postpartum compared with exclusive EE. Mean cumulative milk production among mothers using HE in the first postpartum week remained approximately half that of those using the electric pump throughout the first 28 days, without evident catch up. In multivariable analysis, each postpartum day was associated with an adjusted increase of 50 mL of human milk/day during the first 7 days postpartum and an increase of 13 mL/day between postpartum Days 8 and 28. After adjusting for repeated measures, number of expression sessions per day, and postpartum day, EE was associated with an advantage in milk production of 119 mL/day during the first 28 postpartum days compared with HE. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mothers using EE, mothers using HE had significantly less cumulative daily milk production during the first 7 days postpartum. This trend continued after the intervention had been discontinued, and the great majority of expressions in both groups were with EE. Further research to confirm and expand these findings is warranted.

Patterns and predictors of donor human milk non-consent in the neonatal ICU.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has not evaluated predictors of donor human milk (DHM) non-consent status in a neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) setting within the United States. The purpose of this study is to identify and describe maternal and infant factors associated with DHM consent status in a Level IV inner-city neonatal ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographics and additional maternal/infant data were stratified by DHM consent and compared with the appropriate parametric/nonparametric hypothesis testing statistic. A predictive multivariable logistic regression model was constructed, adjusted for independent predictors identified in the bivariate analysis (p≤0.2) using a backwards selection process (retention threshold p≤0.1). The adjusted odds ratios generated from the multivariable model identified predictors independently associated with DHM non-consent. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 113 mother-infant dyads from the first 18 months of a DHM program, with 65 mothers consenting to DHM and 48 not consenting. Race, ethnicity, marital status, education, delivery mode, and presence of a breastfeeding duration goal qualified for inclusion into the multivariable model. Only race and marital status were retained in the final model. In this sample, black race, other race, and being married are all independent predictors for DHM non-consent. CONCLUSIONS: Black race, other race, and marital status statistically predicted DHM non-consent in a Level IV inner-city neonatal ICU. These results are relevant to all neonatal ICUs who use DHM and to those who are developing DHM programs.