The impact of converting to telehealth for cancer genetic counseling and testing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 outbreak in March 2020 resulted in a shift to telemedicine for cancer genetic counseling (GC). The objective of this study was to determine the effect of telehealth (TH) services on patient acceptance of recommended genetic testing, time to test completion, and follow-up test-disclosure GC appointment, as well as compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations for medical screenings when testing positive for a genetic variant. Data for this retrospective cohort study were collected at a tertiary-care academic health center using the electronic medical record and laboratory portal. Patients with traditional in-person visits (the 2019 control group) and date-matched TH visits (2020) were compared. In total, 206 new GC appointments occurred in the in-person group and 184 new appointments occurred in the TH group. The in-person group was more likely to consent to testing than the TH cohort (92.6% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.003) and had increased rates of sample submission (99.5% vs. 93.75%, p < 0.01), as well as a shorter turn-around time between their initial appointment and laboratory result reporting (34.24 vs. 20.32 days, p < 0.01). There was no increase in time from initial to follow-up GC appointments (67.87 days for control, 62.39 days for THs, p = 0.37). With >2.5 years of follow-up for all study participants, there were no statistically significant differences in pathogenic variant (PV) carrier compliance with screening recommendations. During the COVID-19 pandemic, use of TH allowed patients to access GC with no significant differences in time between initial consultation and follow-up. However, in-person visits were associated with increased patient willingness to consent to and complete genetic testing. This work offers a nuanced look at the success of TH GC during the pandemic and follow-up with screening recommendations, while offering future opportunities to address the acceptance of testing as GC is practiced in a virtual or hybrid model.

Updates in the pathology of Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC).

Pregnancy associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as a breast cancer diagnosed during gestation, lactation or within 5 years postpartum. While the development of malignancy during pregnancy is rare, the incidence is increasing. Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed during pregnancy, affecting up to 1 in 3000 deliveries. New understanding of the pathophysiology of PABC recently resulted in updated definitions distinguishing breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (PrBC) from cancer diagnosed during the postpartum period (PPBC) due to distinct biology and prognosis. Pregnancy has a dual effect on breast cancer development- both protective against cancer and promoting tumor growth. While several hypotheses have been proposed over the years to explain these effects, the most likely hypothesis for the development of PABC is the involution hypothesis, proposing that remodeling programs activated in the immediate postpartum period are similar to wound healing and inflammation that may be associated with tumor development and progression. Although PABCs reflect all subtypes of breast carcinomas, they are most commonly invasive ductal carcinomas of high tumor grade and large tumor size, with more advanced stage at presentation and higher rates of lymph node involvement. Most PABCs are hormone negative tumors (triple negative or HER2 amplified tumors) with high Ki-67 proliferation rates. Several studies have shown that PABCs have different genomic signatures than non-PABC tumors, showing increased expression of immune response mediators. Better understanding of the molecular pathways of tumor initiation and progression, along with prompt diagnosis and novel treatment protocols in the care of PrBC and PPBC are needed to improve outcomes for these young, high-risk breast cancer patients.

Financial toxicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

OBJECTIVE: Financial toxicity (FT), the cumulative financial burden experienced due to medical care, is a well-established adverse effect of healthcare. Patients with BRCA mutations have significantly increased cancer risks compared to non-affected individuals, requiring more frequent screenings and, at times, prophylactic surgery, increasing their risk for FT. Our primary aim in this study was to describe rates of FT among BRCA carriers. METHODS: We performed a novel, cross-sectional study of FT in BRCA1/2 carriers. Participants were recruited via phone and/or email to complete consents and surveys on REDCap. The FACIT-COST tool, a validated tool for measuring FT, was used to assess FT; scores were divided into tertiles, with high FT defined as COST score < 24. RESULTS: 265 BRCA positive female participants met enrollment criteria; 76 (28.7%) consented to participate and completed the survey. Participants were primarily non-Hispanic White (97.4%), privately insured (82.9%), and employed full time (67.1%). A significant proportion (22.7%) of participants reported delaying or avoiding care secondary to finances. No statistically significant association was seen between financial toxicity groups and analyzed demographics. Participants with high FT were more likely to engage in all surveyed cost-saving measures, with 41.7% of participants reporting delays/avoidance of care due to cost (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study of FT in BRCA carriers shows that financial toxicity exists as an issue in this high-risk patient population. This work serves as the first description of FT in BRCA mutation carriers and highlights the importance of incorporating routine counseling on cost when discussing recommendations for screening and clinical care with this patient population.

Severe antepartum hypertension and associated peripartum morbidity among pregnant women in an urban tertiary care medical center.

OBJECTIVES: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Although acute severe hypertension carries with it a poor prognosis, treatment is often delayed and not universal. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 654 patients were assessed for the impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancies on maternal and fetal morbidity and divided into three groups: normotensive (Group I, N = 306), non-severe hypertension (Group II, N = 248) and severe-range hypertension with blood pressure (BP) episodes ≥160 systolic or ≥105 diastolic (Group III, N = 100). Retrospective demographic and medical information was abstracted from patients' medical records to collect study data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes assessed were composite maternal adverse events,fetal adverse events, and time to treatment. RESULTS: Patients in Group III had higher systolic (182 vs 155 vs 133) and diastolic (106 vs 95 vs 81) BPs compared to patients in Groups II and I. Patients in Group III had a significantly higher incidence of maternal adverse events (26.0% vs 6.5% vs 2.0%, respectively; p < 0.001) and higher neonatal composite adverse events (52.0% vs 17.7% vs 26.1%, respectively; p < 0.001) as compared to patients in Groups II and I. Only 52.2% of patients in Group III were treated within recommended 60 minutes or less. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe hypertension antepartum have higher associated maternal and fetal adverse events while treatment is often delayed. Further studies should evaluate the effects of adequate time to treatment for severe hypertension. Steps should also be taken to standardize identification and reporting of severe maternal morbidity.