Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Fertil Steril ; 116(1): 123-129, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33589137

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in women with different age ranges. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): Five hundred forty couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Cycles were split into three groups according to maternal age: ≤36 years old (n = 285), 37-40 years old (n = 147), and >40 years old (n = 108). Semen samples were evaluated for SDF using the Sperm Chromatin Dispersion test and, for each age group, the cycles were subdivided according to SDF index: low fragmentation index (<30% SDF) and high fragmentation index (≥30% SDF). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation, pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): For younger patients (≤36 years old) and those between 37 and 40 years of age, no significant differences were noted in laboratory and clinical outcomes for cycles with <30% SDF or ≥30% SDF. When maternal age was >40 years of age, significantly lower high-quality day-3 embryos (54.4% vs. 33.1% and blastocyst development rates (49.6% vs. 30.2%), lower pregnancy (20.0% vs. 7.7%) and implantation rates (19.7% vs. 11.9%), and increased miscarriage rate (12.5% vs. 100.0%) were observed for cycles with ≥30% SDF compared with <30% SDF, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Older oocytes, when injected with sperm derived from samples with high SDF index, develop into embryos of poor quality that lead consequently to lower implantation and pregnancy rates and higher miscarriage rates, in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles from women with advanced maternal age.


Subject(s)
DNA Fragmentation , DNA Repair , Infertility/surgery , Maternal Age , Oocytes/pathology , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Sperm-Ovum Interactions , Spermatozoa/pathology , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Adult , Embryo Implantation , Female , Fertility , Humans , Infertility/diagnosis , Infertility/physiopathology , Live Birth , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Fertil Steril ; 112(3): 483-490, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31200969

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the implications of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for non-male factor infertility. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Private university-affiliated IVF center. PATIENT(S): Data from 475 cycles performed from June 2016 to June 2017. INTERVENTION(S): Cycles were divided according to SDF rate into two groups: <30% SDF (n = 433) and ≥30% SDF (n = 42). Laboratory and clinical outcomes were compared between groups by generalized linear models adjusted for potential confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo quality and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): Fertilization rate was similar between groups (≥30% SDF, 85.28% ± 1.06% vs. <30% SDF, 90.68% ± 3.61%). Significantly lower rates of normal cleavage speed (≥30% SDF, 61.12% ± 4.21% vs. <30% SDF, 72.53% ± 1.24%), high-quality embryos at day 3 (≥30% SDF, 23.07% ± 5.56% vs. <30% SDF, 36.41% ± 1.53%), blastocyst formation (≥30% SDF, 39.09% ± 2.73% vs. <30% SDF, 58.83% ± 7.59%), blastocyst quality (≥30% SDF, 11.97% ± 1.22% vs. <30% SDF, 30.09% ± 2.39%), and implantation (33.24% ± 1.66% vs. <30% SDF, 46.40% ± 4.61%) were observed in cycles with higher SDF, despite similar pregnancy rates (≥30% SDF, 30.40% vs. <30% SDF, 32.40%). A 2.5-fold miscarriage rate was observed in cycles with an SDF above the established cutoff (≥30% SDF, 42.8% vs. <30% SDF, 16.8%). CONCLUSION(S): Higher SDF is correlated with poor embryo development, lower implantation rate, and higher miscarriage rate in non-male factor infertility intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Since defects in sperm may be hidden, the SDF test can bring additional information to the sperm quality evaluation of men with unknown infertility history.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , DNA Fragmentation , Embryo Implantation/physiology , Embryonic Development/physiology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/trends , Abortion, Spontaneous/diagnosis , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate/trends , Prospective Studies , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/adverse effects , Spermatozoa/physiology
3.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 21(3): 208-211, 2017 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the requirement from the National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), for assisted reproduction treatment patients to undergo laboratory tests for ZIKV detection, and if the public health authorities and government leaders' recommendations to women simply avoid pregnancy is prudent. METHODS: This study was performed in a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center in Brazil. We present a critical discussion on the risk of microcephaly due to ZIKV infection and the prevalence of other harmful pathogens to vulnerable pregnant women and infants. We assessed, 954 patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles (ICSI), between April and November of 2016, concerning the results of ZIKV test, according to different regions in Brazil. RESULTS: Patients undergoing ICSI cycles were split into groups, according to their region of origin: 28 (3.0%) were from the North, 27 (2.8%) were from the Northeast, 40 (4.2%) were from the Midwest, 830 (87.2%) were from the Southeast, and 29 (3.0%) were from the South. Concerning the diagnosis, 112 samples had a positive or inconclusive result for ZIKV, by chromatography immunoassay. These samples were re-analyzed by ELISA and no result was positive. All positive results were from the Southeast region and none from the Northeast or Midwest regions, which are considered endemic regions. CONCLUSION: ZIKV test before the onset of assisted reproduction treatments does not rule out the risk of the infection during pregnancy. In addition, although ZIKV infection risk is extremely high, the microcephaly risk due to ZIKV is not higher than the risk of miscarriage and birth defects due to other recognized pathogens.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Microcephaly , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/statistics & numerical data , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Abortion, Spontaneous/prevention & control , Abortion, Spontaneous/virology , Brazil/epidemiology , Congenital Abnormalities/prevention & control , Congenital Abnormalities/virology , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Humans , Microcephaly/prevention & control , Microcephaly/virology , Pregnancy , Zika Virus Infection/complications , Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis , Zika Virus Infection/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...