Optimal management of the morbidly obese patient. SAGES appropriateness conference statement.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a growing health problem that contributes to numerous life-threatening or disabling disorders, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, degenerative joint disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Significant weight reduction in the morbidly obese improves or reverses associated illness and benefits well-being. The purpose of the SAGES Appropriateness Conference was to summarize the state of the art for open and laparoscopic operations for the morbidly obese. METHODS: The English literature comparing bariatric procedures was reviewed and grouped by level of evidence by three surgeons (BS, LV, and CC). From more than 1,500 articles, all conference participants were provided with reprints and table summaries of no less than 50 selected manuscripts. Ten experts were requested to present reviews and make evidence-based arguments for and against the open and laparoscopic approaches in written format. An expert panel of six surgeons, including an ethicist and patient, commented on implications of data presented. The finalized statement was e-mailed to all participants for approval and comment. RESULTS: Consensus statements were achieved on various aspects of morbid obesity, including indications for surgery, resolution of comorbid illnesses with significant weight loss, and the importance of committed bariatric program. Our panel of experts agreed, in general, to the advantages of laparoscopic approaches compared to open operations in skilled hands. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) affords improved short-term recovery compared to open gastric bypass. Laparoscopic adjustable banding can be performed with lower average mortality than either RYGB or any of the malabsorptive operations, and it produces variable degrees of short-term weight loss. Prospective randomized trials are needed to compare gastric bypass, malabsorptive, and restrictive procedures.

Intraoperative ultrasound and prophylactic ursodiol for gallstone prevention following laparoscopic gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that ursodiol decreases gallstone formation from 32% to 2% following open gastric bypass, but no data exist on laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) screening. METHODS: LRYGB with IOUS were performed on 195 consecutive patients. Patients with gallstones underwent simultaneous cholecystectomy, and patients without gallstones were prescribed ursodiol, 300 mg twice daily, for 6 month. Follow-up survey and ultrasound. RESULTS: Of 195 patients, 44 (23%) had had a prior cholecystectomy, 21 (11%) underwent a simultaneous cholecystectomy, 129 (66%) had gallbladders left intact, and one (0.5%) false negative IOUS was excluded. Of 69 patients with ultrasound and survey follow-up (mean, 10 months), 19 (28%) developed gallstones seven with symptoms), and 50 (72%) were gallstone free. Forty-one percent of patients were compliant with ursodiol. There was no difference in compliance between patients with and without gallstones. In patients with gallstones, all of the symptomatic patients were noncompliant, whereas none of the compliant patients developed symptoms. Medication side-effects occurred in 17 of 69 patients (25%). CONCLUSIONS: IOUS during LRYGB efficiently screens for gallstones, and selective cholecystectomy followed by prophylactic ursodiol results in low morbidity. Improvements in compliance may lower the incidence of postoperative gallstone formation.

Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal leak is a complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Contrast studies may underdiagnose leaks, forcing surgeons to rely solely on clinical data. This study was designed to evaluate various clinical signs for detecting leakage after LRYGB. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 210 consecutive patients who underwent LRYGB between April 1999 and September 2001. There were nine documented leaks (4.3%). Clinical signs between patients with leaks (group 1) and those without leaks (group 2) were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Evidence of respiratory distress and a heart rate exceeding 120 beats per min were the two most sensitive indicators of gastrointestinal leak. Routine upper gastrointestinal contrast imaging detected only two of nine leaks (22%). CONCLUSION: Leak after LRYGB may be difficult to detect. Evidence of respiratory distress and tachycardia exceeding 120 beats per min may be the most useful clinical indicators of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the porcine model.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) may be performed using a variety of methods. The purpose of this study was to learn how to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation laparoscopically, using a porcine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 11 domestic pigs (mean weight 47 kg) underwent LRYGBP. In 8 animals, a completely laparoscopic approach was attempted, while in 3 animals a hand-assist device was used. Techniques for anvil placement, pouch calibration, and limb-length measurement were evaluated. Animals were sacrificed at the end of the procedure, and operative results were recorded. RESULTS: The hand-assist device restored tactile feedback but obscured visualization. The gastrojejunostomy leak rate was 64%, and the jejunojejunostomy leak rate was 73%. Anvil placement using transgastric and transoral methods was feasible. Calibrating the pouch with a Baker's tube was more accurate than using anatomical landmarks. Measuring limb-lengths using Babcock clamps was reliable with practice. CONCLUSION: The frailty of the porcine small intestine may limit one's ability to achieve intact anastomoses. Despite the anatomic limitations, the porcine model was well-suited for skill development and evaluation of techniques for performing the LRYGBP operation.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: transoral or transgastric anvil placement?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques have been used to perform the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). The gastrojejunostomy may be constructed using an end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) stapler. Most reports describe passing the EEA anvil transorally using an esophagogastroscope and a pull-wire technique. METHOD: We describe problems experienced using this technique and present an alternative method. RESULTS: Esophageal injury may occur during laparoscopic RYGBP (LRYGBP) using the transoral anvil placement technique. When the anvil is retrieved into the gastric pouch, the anvil may become lodged at the cricopharngeus muscle. Dislodgment can be problematic and time-consuming. We present a case of mild esophageal injury which occurred during transoral anvil placement. The patient had transient postoperative dysphagia and recovered without sequelae. We present an alternative method in which the anvil is passed through a gastrotomy. CONCLUSION: Transgastric anvil placement alleviates the need for endoscopy, thereby saving time and resources. This technique eliminates the potential for esophageal injury. The transgastric anvil placement technique has proven reliable. The transgastric method may make the LRYGBP operation safer and easier to perform.