Intraoperative live measurement of femoral head size for acetabular cup sizing: simple, accurate, and green!

PURPOSE: Templating is the first step in achieving a successful total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesize that native head size is highly correlated with implanted cup size. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to look for a correlation between sizes of the intra-operative measurement of the femoral head and the implanted cup. METHODS: This is a monocentric observational study conducted from December 2018 till January 2023. All patients admitted for a primary total hip arthroplasty were included and retrospectively reviewed. Intra-operative femoral head measurement, radiographic femoral head diameter, templated (planned) cup size, and definitive implanted cup size were recorded. RESULTS: The sample included 154 patients (85 female and 69 males) with a mean age of 66.2 ± 10.4 years. There were 157 THA cases; 82 on the right side and 75 on the left side. The native head size and acetate template on digital radiographs were the most significantly positively correlated with cup size (P < 0.0001) while the radiological head size was significantly negatively correlated with cup size (P = 0.009). The implanted cup was on average 2 ± 2 mm bigger than the native head size measured intra-operatively. CONCLUSION: The native femoral head diameter measured intra-operatively is a simple and reliable tool to help the surgeons choose the proper size of the acetabular cup, preventing complications during surgery hence optimizing results post operatively. This technique would contribute to a more ecofriendly orthopaedic reconstructive surgery.

Dual-mobility cups could yield lesser infections than conventional cups: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

INTRODUCTION: Dual-mobility cups (DMC) are gaining popularity mainly for their reduced rate of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently, indication for DMC use extends beyond patients with high risk of dislocation or revision THA cases. Many authors reported DMC outcomes in primary THA for all aetiologies. However, some reports claimed that the use of DMC is accompanied with higher rates of infection compared with conventional cups (CC) in both primary and revision THA. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the use of DMC generate higher rates of infection when compared with conventional cups? OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis was to look for significant difference in the rate of post-operative infection between DMC cups and conventional cups. METHODOLOGY: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched since inception. Only studies with comparative design reporting the outcome infection rate were included. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective comparative studies were located comprising 248,541 patients: 16,020 in the DMC group and 232,521 in the CC group. The mean follow-up period was 37.5 ± 42 and 50.2 ± 48.7 months for the DMC and CC groups, respectively. The meta-analytical results indicated the following: (a) significantly lesser infections following DMC compared with CC in revision THA (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75 (95% CI = 0.653 to 0.874, P = 0.0002, I2 = 25%); (b) for primary THA and for large-sampled registries, significance was found using only the fixed-effects model estimate; and (c) no significant difference was found for the subgroup of cohort studies. CONCLUSION: Our results clearly refute the claim that DMC would yield higher rates of infection. On the contrary, the findings demonstrated that the use of DMC reduces the risk of post-operative infection in revision THA and a similar lower infection trend for primary THA when compared with the standard cups.

Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option?

Revision of large-diameter, monoblock acetabular components for both hip resurfacing arthroplasty and metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is correlated to a high amount of complications. For this reason, performing a limited revision by conversion to a dual mobility (DM) without acetabular component exchange has been proposed in order to limit these complications. Although DM bearing offers an easy solution avoiding the intraoperative and time-associated complications, concern about polyethylene wear and stability remains due to the difference regarding the design, the coverage angle and the clearance of the two implants. In order to evaluate the performance of this new solution with the new material to prevent the possibility of failure it is essential to conduct a review of the literature A qualitative systematic review of the literature has been conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Scopus for English and French articles between January 2000 and October 2019 was performed, with the primary objective of finding articles about dual mobility bearing coupling with large metal-on-metal cup in the case of hip revision procedure. Various combinations of the key words were used in the search strategy. Thirteen articles with DM bearing mated with MoM cup were analyzed. Of the 130 hip revisions selected, with a follow-up from 6 to 53 months, there were a total of 14 with complications (10.77%): four true dislocations (3.08%); six intra-prosthetic dislocations (IPD, 4.6%), two of which presented plastic deformation and polyethylene wear; four other complications (3.08%), included a cup osteolysis, a clicking noise, a superficial infection and a periprosthetic fracture. All the mentioned true dislocations occurred during the first month while IPDs appeared during the first two years from the index revision. In conclusion, according to the literature analyzed, we can stress that the concerns and doubts about mating a DM bearing with large MoM cup cannot be dissolved. It has been pointed out that a DM bearing is not designed for a MoM cup; it is not mechanically tested on MoM cups, which presents different clearance and coverage angles. Predictable complications may occur, such as IPD, polyethylene wear and true dislocation. These complications have been reported at an even higher rate than they were in the eighties, when the first generation of DM implants were of a lower quality of polyethylene and the characteristic of the design was less optimal than modern ones.

Charnley femoral cemented stem with a permeable and resorbable cement restrictor and low-viscosity cement - Clinical and radiographical evaluation of 100 cases at a mean follow-up of 6.55 years.

INTRODUCTION: In 1979, in his first book dealing with low-friction arthroplasty (LFA), Charnley highlighted the use of a cement restrictor. Breusch and Malchau described in 2005 the "second-generation cementing technique." The main objective of this study was to report on the clinical survival of 100 cases of Charnley femoral component implanted in 2007 and 2008 using a permeable and resorbable cement restrictor and a low-viscosity antibiotic-loaded cement. The secondary objectives were to analyze the complications and side effects and the accuracy of the device positioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a monocentric retrospective review of a prospectively compiled database. Diaphyseal restrictor was biodegradable and permeable to gas, blood, and fluids to avoid intramedullary over pression during cementation. The cement was a low-viscosity antibiotic-loaded cement. Among 3555 patients, we selected the first continuous 100 cases of patients where we implanted the device. Survival probability was computed according to Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.55 ± 2.6 (range 1-11). Considering femoral component revision as the endpoint, survival rate was 100%. No patients died intraoperatively, none in the first month and the first year after surgery. No early periprosthetic fractures have been reported. DISCUSSION: As described initially by Charnley, the use of a cement restrictor was highly recommended through the different generations of cementing techniques. Hypotensive episodes and cardiac arrest have been reported during cement insertion. In our series, we did not deplore any adverse effect related to the cementation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a 100% survival rate of a cemented femoral component without adverse effects when using routinely a resorbable and permeable cement restrictor and a low-viscosity cement. Bone cement is still a fantastic ally for the surgeon and the patients.

Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Versus Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: Comparative Study and Results at Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are serious injuries associated with relatively high mortality rates and disabilities, commonly seen in elderly persons. There is an ongoing debate regarding the advantages of various hip arthroplasty devices. This study aimed to analyze the long-term advantages of 2 different surgical procedures and assess if the dislocation rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS), and functional independence measure (FIM) are more favorable in dual mobility (DM) than those in hemiarthroplasty (HA). HYPOTHESIS: Dual mobility procedures provide better postoperative outcomes than HA in terms of HHS, FIM, and dislocation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey was a prospective, comparative interventional single-blinded study performed at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo, a tertiary health-care institution. A total of 94 patients underwent DM or conventional bipolar HA for repair of displaced femoral neck fractures within 2 weeks of injury. Primary outcomes were postoperative dislocation rate, FIM, and HHS. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative blood loss, time to first postoperative full weight-bearing, time to walking ability with and without crutches, mortality rate, and postoperative infection rate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences for most parameters between the groups. We found a significant difference in the dislocation rate between the 2 groups, wherein there were no dislocations in the DM group and 3 dislocations in the HHS group (0% vs 6.4%). In terms of postoperative HHS at 12 months and 3 years, DM provided better outcomes (<0.034 and <0.014, respectively). DISCUSSION: Dual mobility compares favorably to HA in terms of dislocation rate and HHS, while no difference was found for FIM. In order to have a more complete overview, we recommend more intense long-term studies including several heterogeneous parameters to compare the clinical outcomes between DM and HA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE WITH STUDY DESIGN: Level II.

Primary cementless total knee arthroplasty with or without stem extension: a matched comparative study of ninety eight standard stems versus ninety eight long stems after more than ten years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Using a cementless fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We hypothesized that cementless tibial base plate with a monoblock long stem (MLS) would provide secure tibial alignment and stable fixation when bone conditions were considered as poor for a cementless fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the mean eight year survivorship of cementless standard keels (SK) vs cementless MLS. MATERIAL METHODS: We report a matched series of 98 cases of SK and 98 cases of MLS in patients with poor bone conditions. The two cohorts were statistically compared. Revision for tibial loosening was used as the endpoint in the survivorship analysis. RESULTS: We recorded two cases of tibial loosening and three cases of bipolar loosening in the SK group (0% MLS vs 5% SK). No tibial loosening occurred in the MLS group (statistically significant). No tibial periprosthetic or intra-operative fractures occurred in either group. The survivorship at eight years of follow-up was 95.6% in the SS cohort vs 100% in the MLS cohort using revision for tibial loosening as the endpoint. DISCUSSION: This study was not randomized. Its strength was that it took into account the comparative midterm outcomes of a matched cohort of patients implanted with two types of cementless components in the same bone conditions. We did not record any tibial loosening in the MLS group. Using long stems has been criticized but we did not observe any adverse reactions and no intra-operative tibial fracture occurred. CONCLUSION: MLS improves the alignment and fixation of cementless TKA. This is a safe solution when bone conditions are poor or modified by previous surgery.

Extended trochanteric osteotomy: comparison of 3 modes of fixation: metallic wires, cables, plate, about a series of 157 cases.

INTRODUCTION: The trans femoral osteotomy was initially described by Wagner in 1987 and the extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) was described by Younger et al. in 1995 and is considered to be the gold standard technique for removal of well-fixed femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this report is: to compare the different types of fixation metallic wires, cables, metallic reinforcement plate (MRP) we have used in revision THA where an ETO was performed; analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of these devices at 1 year; analyse the complication. MATERIAL AND METHOD: It is a retrospective continuous monocentric series of 157 patients where an ETO was performed. It was fixed by an MRP in 17 patients, cables in 43, metallic wires in 97. The main outcome was the consolidation of the osteotomized femoral flap (OFF). Secondary outcomes were Postel Merle d'Aubigne score and complications occurred at 1 year follow up. Qualitative variable was presented as percentage, quantitative variables as mean or median, standard deviation and range. RESULT: 157 patients (73-46, 5% females) were included. Mean age at surgery was 66.7 year (sd = 10.63). Mean interval between index surgery and revision was 11.07 year (sd = 5.67). Causes for revision and bone defects were comparable. At 1 year OFF is healed without displacement in 82% with metallic wires, 70% with cables, 88% with MRP. Not significant. DISCUSSION: Fixation of the femoral flap is a technical issue in ETO. Metallic wires and cables are the most commonly used to secure the fixation. Fixation with a metallic plate is reported in a few number of articles and may be helpful specially when a fracture of the OFF occurred during surgery.

Is dual mobility associated with an increased risk of revision for infection? Matched cohort of 231 cases of dual-mobility cups and 231 fixed cups.

INTRODUCTION: We used a matched cohort of 231 cases of revision of primary dual-mobility cups (DMC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 231 cases of fixed cups (FC) THA, to determine whether (i) revision for infection was more frequent when using DMC-THA than FC-THA; (ii) Causes for revision were significantly different. METHODS: The French Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology carried out a prospective multicentre study from 2010 to 2011. The inclusion criterion was an exhaustive collection of 1st revision THA (at least 1 component revised, re-revision excluded). 2,044 1st revision cases were prospectively collected; 251 (13.5%) were revision of DMC-THA and 1,793 were revision of FC-THA (87.7%). We defined a matching process (1:1) between the 2 cohorts. 231 DMC-THAs were eligible for comparison with 231 FC-THAs. RESULTS: 47 (20.3%) FC-THAs were revised for infection and 54 (23.3%) DMC-THAs. There was no statistical difference (p = 0.43). 41 (17.7%) FC-THAs were revised for dislocation, compared to 11 (4.7%) DMC-THAs (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: The main finding of our study was that DMC was not associated with an increased risk of revision for infection compared to standard THA. THA revision for infection was not correlated to the type of cup used. It is mandatory to report on comparable types of patients when comparing outcomes. For similar patient profiles (i) DMC-THAs were not revised more often for infection than FC-THA (ii) FC-THAs were revised 4 times more for dislocation than DMC-THA.

How is patella height modified after total knee arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Since the first measurement method of patella height in 1929 (Janssen), more than 16 methods have been described. Most of these measures are not suitable to measure patella height after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One of us (JC) modified the original Caton Deschamps (oCD), index with a new relative index called modified Caton Deschamps (mCD) index, by using new landmarks. The purpose of this study was to determine how patella height is modified after TKA. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty primary TKAs were consecutively prospectively enrolled. One type of implant was used (cementless postero-stabilized TKA, rotating plateau, cemented patella resurfacing). Patient's characteristics, functional and radiological outcomes were recorded pre-operatively and at one year follow-up. Pre-operative and post-operative outcomes were compared by paired t-test. Post-operative outcomes were compared between groups by one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Average difference between pre and post-operative mCD was 0.19 in this series. In 81.7% of cases, patella was lowered. Patients were classified in three groups according to patella height lowering. Between these three groups, no significant statistical differences (IKS score knee and function, range of motion) could be identified. DISCUSSION: In TKA, patella assessment in sagittal plane is as important as frontal or horizontal planes. True patella infera (TPI) is mostly due to patella tendon shortening measured by oCD. Pseudo patella infera (PPI) measured by mCD is mostly due to joint line elevation (over femoral cut with an over thickness of the tibial component). In this study a moderate patella lowering (minor than 15%) does not have a significant impact on the functional results (IKS, ROM) nevertheless in 80% patella is lowered. The next step will be to analyze precisely what factors are influencing this lowering and what prevention could be suggested in primary and revision TKA.

Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.

INTRODUCTION: Since 1996 we have been using cementless fixation with hydroxyapatite (HA) coating. The purpose of this paper is to compare survivorship of a series of 100 cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to a similar series of 100 cementless with a follow up of 11-16 years. Material methods: Both TKA are mobile bearing total knee postero-stabilized. They can be used with cement or without cement. Among 1030 New Wave TKATM implanted from 2002 to 2015 we have identified 100 cemented TKAs and 100 cementless TKAs. All these cases were primary replacement. Differences in survival probability were determined using log-rank test. RESULTS: Survival probabilities at 11 years of follow-up were: Cemented group: 90.2% CI95% [81.9-94.8]; Cementless group: 95.4% CI95% [88.1-98.2]. Comparison between both group showed significant difference, p = 0.32. DISCUSSION: The advantages of cementless TKA are bone stock preservation, cement debris protection and the potential to achieve biologic fixation. Cementless implants rely on a porous or roughened surface to facilitate bone formation. HA has been shown to accelerate bone integration and to decrease micro motion of the components and to increase fixation. With a survival probability of 90.2% (cemented version) and 95.4% (cementless version), this total knee prosthesis performs as intended in primary total knee arthroplasty. No statistical differences could be found between cemented and cementless implants.

Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results.

INTRODUCTION: The dual-mobility cup (DMC) was introduced in 1979. Due to lack of referenced publications, this interesting and innovating concept was ignored during close to 20 years. However, 180 studies (level III or IV) have now been published. Evidence-based medicine is based on level I studies. Over the past three decades, the role of national registries developed with the intention of surveying orthopaedic implants. In 2012, we developed, registered, and implemented a specific database for contemporary DMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data are collected with an electronic case-report form, and this evaluation is limited to a single product line . From May 2012 to December 2016, 2090 cases of Quattro cup implantation have been registered; results of the first 636 primary cases with a minimum follow-up of three years were previously reported (series 1). Of the 1454 remaining cases, dislocation rate only was monitored (series 2) and results are reported here. RESULTS: In series1 comprising 553 degenerative diseases and 83 proximal femoral fractures (PFF), one dislocation (1.2%) occurred in PFF and none in degenerative disease. Survivorship (infection excluded) at three years was 99.8%. In series 2 (1315 degenerative diseases; 139 PFFs), dislocation rate was 0.27% (four cases). In neither series did we observe any intraprosthetic dislocation. DISCUSSION: Results of this private regional register confirm the high efficiency of DMC to decrease dislocation rate (0.23%). Few outcomes of DMC in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are published in national registries. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register has reported on 287 primary DMC hips of 78,098 THAs. No dislocations were reported. We conclude that DMC decreases dislocation rate, and the national registry of Lithuania also reports a significant decrease in the rate of revision for dislocation in the DMC group. These data-available online-allow us to monitor DMC in real time, although they lack short-term follow-up.

Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty : Matched case-control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants.

INTRODUCTION: The causes for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are various and quite well known. The developing use of dual-mobility THA (DM-THA) seems a relevant option to decrease the risk of instability. Due to lack of long-term follow-up, this innovative retentive concept is suspected to increase the risk of polyethylene (PE) wear. the aim of the study was to analyse the causes for DM-THA revision and assess whether or not its occurrence is different from that of fixed-standard (FS) THA , particularly for aseptic loosening or wear and/or osteolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SoFCOT group conducted an observational prospective multicentre study from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011. Inclusion criteria comprised an exhaustive collection of 2044 first-revision THAs with 251 DM-THAs and 1793 FS-THAs. After excluding complications linked to patient factors (infection and periprosthetic fractures), we performed a matched case-control study (matching ratio 1:1) comparing two groups of 133 THAs. RESULTS: Revisions for aseptic loosening or osteolysis/wear were as frequent in DM-THA (58.7 %) as in FS-THA (57.1 %) (p 0.32); 7.5 % of DM-THA were revised for dislocation versus 19.5 % of FS-THA (p 0.007). DISCUSSION: Revision for osteolysis/wear and aseptic loosening were as frequent in DM-THA as in FS-THA; revision for dislocation was less frequent in DM-THA. This confirms the efficiency of the DM concept regarding the risk of dislocation. Causes for revision were different between groups, and revisions for dislocation were less frequent in DM-THA. Only prospective comparative studies could provide reliable information that may support broader use of the DM concept.

Low friction arthroplasty and dual mobility cup: a new gold standard.

INTRODUCTION: Low friction arthroplasty (LFA) introduced by Sir John Charnley was the gold standard for many years. Dislocation and infection are the first causes for early revision. Late failures are polyethylene (PE) wear and loosening. Due to dislocation risk we slowly switched to the use of LFA with dual mobility cups (DMC). The purposes of this study are (1) to assess whether our changes have improved outcomes and (2) what is the new gold standard? MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected from an observational registry of 1,091 cases of hybrid Charnley total hip arthroplasty (THA). The acetabular component was either DMC in 455 cases or fixed cup (FC) in 636 cases. RESULTS: Three dislocations (0.6%) occurred in the DMC group (none revised). In the FC group 54 dislocated (8.49%) and 20 were recurrent and underwent revision (revision rate 3.14%). In the DMC group, five acetabular and three femoral revisions were performed (revision rate for loosening 1.7%). In the FC group 19 cases underwent acetabular revision, and five cases had femoral component revised (revision rate for loosening 3.7%). DISCUSSION: Charnley's LFA has proven over 50 years of excellent survivorship. To decrease dislocation risk, one suggested increasing femoral head diameter. Gilles Bousquet proposed another way, namely, the DMC concept. Dislocation is no longer a critical issue with DMC as demonstrated in our series and main series. DMC in primary THA is still a subject of debate. Mid-term results do not demonstrate a higher rate of wear than LFA. What is the current gold standard? LFA was and is our current gold standard in association with a DMC.

Equivalent wear performance of dual mobility bearing compared with standard bearing in total hip arthroplasty: in vitro study.

PURPOSE: Osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on polyethylene wear and dictates the survival of the prosthesis. Dual mobility in THAs, which is claimed to reduce dislocation risk, has very good long-term clinical results. However, little is known about how the liner wears in this design, compared to the standard single mobility model. METHODS: A comparative study looking at wear of a conventional ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liner, using gravimetric measurement, between dual mobility implants and standard implants, was performed on a simulator in accordance with a normed protocol based on the same dimensions, environmental conditions and stresses. A linear regression test was employed. RESULTS: Under the same conditions (loading, cycles, sterilization, material and surface roughness), the gravimetric wear (for conventional polyethylene) is comparable between a standard and a dual mobility cup. This correlates to ten year follow-up results of dual mobility cup. DISCUSSION - CONCLUSION: This in vitro equivalent wear serves to confirm the very good long-term clinical results observed with dual mobility bearing, whose use should not be restricted by concerns about increased polyethylene wear.

Patellar height assessment in total knee arthroplasty: a new method.

INTRODUCTION: We described in 1981 a method to evaluate patellar height in normal and symptomatic knees on sagittal X-ray view. This index is a frequently used method, yet it is not suitable after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The original method measures the distance between the distal margin of the articular surface of the patella (point A) and the anterosuperior angle of the tibial plateau (point T), then the length of the patellar articular surface (AP). The index is AT/AP ratio (normal values range from 0.8 to 1.2). After TKA, the T landmark is no longer available, so we must define a new T' landmark. This point is situated at the intersection between the line perpendicular to the tibial posterior cortex elevated at the tip of the fibular head and the tibial anterior cortex. This remarkable landmark can be identified before and after TKA, with a new relative index AT'/AP ratio. This modified method allows the comparison of patella height before and after TKA. RESULTS: We have used this modified index with the collaboration of several authors during the testing of different models of TKA, with an accurate reproducibility. Repeatability (usually called intra-observer reliability) was good, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 0.58 and 0.75 among the observers. Reproducibility (usually called inter-observer reliability) was also considered as good, with ICC ranging from 0.64 to 0.72. DISCUSSION: Patella height measurement has to be assessed with the original method (AT/AP) to detect patella infera that could influence the surgical approach. The correlation between original and modified indexes has to be assessed. The modification of patella height after TKA could be evaluated through the modified index and compared with functional results.

Trans trochanteric approach with coronal osteotomy of the great trochanter: A new technique for extra-capsular trochanteric fracture patients treated by total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly.

Several surgical approaches could be used in hip arthroplasty or trauma surgery: anterior, anterolateral, lateral, posterior (with or without trochanterotomy), using or not an orthopedic reduction table. Subtrochanteric and extra-capsular trochanteric fractures (ECTF) are usually treated by internal fixation with mandatory restrictions on weight bearing. Specific complications have been widely described. Mechanical failures are particularly high in unstable fractures. Hip fractures are a major public health issue with a mortality rate of 12%-23% at 1 year. An alternative option is to treat ECTF by total hip arthroplasty (THA) to prevent decubitus complications, to help rapid recovery, and to permit immediate weight bearing as well as quick rehabilitation. However, specific risks of THA have to be considered such as dislocation or cardiovascular failure. The classical approach (anterior or posterior) requires the opening of the joint and capsule, weakening hip stability and the repair of the great trochanter is sometimes hazardous. For 15 years, we have been treating unstable ECTF by THA with cementless stem, dual mobility cup (DMC), greater trochanter (GT) reattachment, and a new surgical approach preserving capsule, going through the fracture and avoiding joint dislocation. Bombaci first described a similar approach in 2008; our trans fractural digastric approach (medial gluteus and lateral vastus) is different. A coronal GT osteotomy is performed when there is no coronal fracture line. It allows easy access to the femoral neck and acetabulum. The THA is implanted without femoral internal rotation to avoid extra bone fragment displacement. With pre-operative planning, cup implantation is easy and stem positioning is adjusted referring to the top of the GT after trial reduction and preoperative planning. The longitudinal osteotomy and trochanteric fracture are repaired with wires and the digastric incision is closed. This variant of Bombaci approach could be use routinely for hemiarthroplasty or THA in the cases of unstable ECTF. It reduces complications usually linked to this procedure. Blood loss, operating time, and pain are limited, allowing fast recovery in order to decrease morbidity and mortality.

Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision.

PURPOSE: Dislocation is a frequent complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Cup fixation is the second concern. In order to know outcomes at two years, we prospectively followed a continuous series of 78 patients to demonstrate that cementless dual-mobility cup (DMC) used in revision THA is safe as regards dislocation risk and bone fixation. METHOD: We enrolled 78 consecutive patients (79 cases) in a prospective study. Mean interval between index surgery and revision was 12.9 years. Mean age at revision was 75.5 years. Two types of cementless DMC were used: a standard DMC in 68 cases with low-grade bone defect (Paprosky grade 1 and 2), and a specific design reconstruction DMC in 11 cases with severe bone loss (Paprosky grade 3). RESULTS: At two years of follow-up, 68 patients were reviewed; four were lost to follow-up., and six patients were deceased. We identified three types of situations at risk:standard risk (33 cases), Paprosky grade 1 or 2; medium risk (37 cases), revision for recurrent instability (21), periprosthetic fractures (14) or severe loosening Paprosky grade 3 without femorotomy (2); high risk (nine cases), revision for severe loosening with a femorotomy. One (1.3%) patient dislocated her hip at one month without recurrence. Revision rate for dislocation was 0%; two (2.7%) early mechanical failures occurred. CONCLUSION: Considering outcomes of this series, cementless DMC can be suggested in THA revision surgery.