Exploring robotic total hysterectomies: a multi-site experience with the Senhance Surgical System.

Robotic-assisted surgery emerged as a technological advancement in the twentieth century, with gynaecology being a key adopter of this approach. The Senhance Surgical System has gained prominence for total hysterectomies from single-site experiences, but multi-site reporting are still lacking in present literature. This multi-site study, conducted at Klaipeda University Hospital and Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of total hysterectomies with the Senhance Surgical System. The study involved 295 cases, showcasing a well-established routine with minimal procedure times. The average age of the patients was 53.5 years (SD: 10.3 years), ranging from 18 to 80 years. The patients' BMI averaged 25.6 kg/m2 (SD: 6.2 kg/m2), ranging from a minimum of 17.7 kg/m2 to a maximum of 69.5 kg/m2. The duration of surgery varied between 30 and 215 min, with a median of 95 min (IQR: 81-116). The docking time was a median of 3 (IQR: 2-5) min and varied between 1.0 and 30.0 min, with a minimum to a maximum range of 1.0 to 122 min. Conversion (3 cases, 1%) and adverse events (6 cases, 2%) were infrequent. Additionally, robotic malfunctions were recorded minimally in 4,1% (12 cases) of the procedures, and pain on a 0-10 visual pain scale was reduced from mild [2.7 (± 1.2)] one day postoperative to minimal [0.9 (± 0.5)] at discharge. Overall, a great routine with the Senhance Surgical System proves good control and, thus, feasibility and safety. Therefore, the Senhance Surgical System is a viable option for total hysterectomy.

Assessing the long-term clinical benefit of prolonged-release fampridine tablets in a real-world setting: a review of 67 cases.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term effects of prolonged-release (PR) fampridine tablets (dalfampridine extended release) in clinical practice in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with walking impairment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MS patients with walking impairment deemed candidates for treatment with PR-fampridine tablets were included in this case series. Clinical assessments included the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12), EuroQoL-5D, and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The T25FW was videotaped at each visit. Assessments were performed at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment with PR-fampridine tablets 10 mg twice daily. Clinical benefit of treatment was defined as any improvement in T25FW or MSWS-12 score at 4 weeks. Patients who demonstrated clinical benefit continued treatment and were assessed at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Among all patients (N = 67; mean MS duration, 16.5 years; mean EDSS score, 4.8; mean T25FW, 13.9 seconds), 65, 52, and 48 completed the 4-week, 3-month, and 6-month visits, respectively. After 4 weeks, 50.7% and 32.8% of patients walked ≥10% and ≥20% faster, respectively; and in 65.7% of patients, MSWS-12 scores improved. Three patients experienced adverse events (nausea, n = 2, insomnia, n = 1) that resulted in discontinuation of treatment. After 6 months, 38.8% and 16.4% of patients walked ≥10% and ≥20% faster versus baseline, respectively; and in 59.7% of patients, MSWS-12 scores improved. Among patients who demonstrated clinical benefit of treatment at 6 months, FSS scores improved on average by 1 point and MSWS-12 scores by 10 points. Three case studies showing different outcomes of PR-fampridine treatment are detailed with a visual depiction of the changes observed. CONCLUSION: In this case series, a proportion of patients demonstrated a clinical benefit of PR-fampridine treatment on walking. Determining which patients derive benefit from PR-fampridine is an important aspect of treatment. A range of clinical and patient-reported factors should be considered when assessing the clinical benefit of PR-fampridine treatment in MS patients.