ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) are an integral component of modern casualty care, allowing early transport of critically ill and injured patients. Aeromedical evacuation of patients with significant pulmonary impairment is sometimes beyond the scope of CCATT because of limitations of the transport ventilator and potential for further respiratory deterioration in flight. The Acute Lung Rescue Team (ALRT) was developed to facilitate transport of these patients out of the combat theater. METHODS: The United States TRANSCOM Regulation and Command/Control Evacuation System and the United States Army Institute of Surgical Research Joint Theater Trauma Registry databases were reviewed for all critical patients transported out of theater between November 2005 and March 2007. Patient demographics, diagnosis, and clinical history were abstracted and ALRT patients were compared with CCATT patients. RESULTS: The ALRT was activated for 11 patients during the study period. Five patients were transported as a result of these activations. Trauma-related diagnoses were responsible for 82% of these requests. ALRT missions comprised 0.6% of all critical patient movements out of the combat theater and 1% of ventilator transports. Average FIO2 was 0.92 +/- 0.11 for ALRT patients and 0.53 +/- 0.14 for CCATT patients (p = 0.005). ALRT patients required a mean positive end expiratory pressure of 19.0 cm H2O +/- 2.2 cm H2O compared with 6.5 cm H2O +/- 2.4 cm H2O in the CCATT group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Lung injury in the combat theater severe enough to exceed the capability of CCATT transport is uncommon. Patients for whom ALRT was activated had significantly higher positive end expiratory pressure and FIO2 than those transported by CCATT. One-fourth of patients for whom ALRT was considered died before the team could be launched; transport may have been a futile consideration in these patients. Patients with even severe acute respiratory distress syndrome can be successfully transported by experienced, equipped specialty teams.
Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , Lung Injury/therapy , Military Personnel , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Blast Injuries/complications , Blast Injuries/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hospitals, Military , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Lung Injury/complications , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Landstuhl Regional Medical Center is the largest U.S. medical facility outside the United States, and it is the first permanently positioned hospital outside the combat zone providing care to the wartime sick and wounded. As of November 2007, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center personnel have treated over 45,000 patients from Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. The current trauma/critical care service is a multidisciplinary, intensivist-directed team caring for a diverse range of clinical diagnoses to include battle injuries, diseases, and nonbattle injuries. Admissions arise from an at-risk population of 500,000 widely distributed over a geographic area encompassing three continents. DISCUSSION: When compared with 2001, the average daily intensive care unit census has tripled and the patient acuity level has doubled. Combat casualties account for 85% of service admissions. The clinical practice at this critical care hub continues to evolve as a result of wartime damage control trauma care, robust critical care air transport capabilities, length of stay, and other unique factors. The service's focus is to optimize patients for an uneventful evacuation to the United States for definitive care and family support. SUMMARY: Successful verification in 2007 as an American College of Surgeons level II trauma center reflects a continuing institutional commitment to providing the best possible care to the men and women serving our nation in the global war on terror.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Hospitals, Military/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Military Medicine/organization & administration , Transportation of Patients/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Afghanistan , Enteral Nutrition , Germany , Humans , Infection Control , Iraq , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Military Medicine/education , Organizational Innovation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Spinal Injuries/prevention & control , Terrorism , Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Total Quality Management , United StatesABSTRACT
Work-related upper extremity burns often occur. The cause directs the course of action. Thermal burns should be assessed for system alterations, and depth of burn should be determined. Deep partial-thickness burns and more severe burns require a specialist evaluation. Chemical burns must be irrigated and the agent identified. Some chemical burns, such as those that involve phenols and metal fragments, require specific topical applications before water lavage. Hydrofluoric acid burns can cause life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities with a small, highly concentrated acid burn. The goal with any extremity burn is to provide the patient with a multidisciplinary team approach to achieve a functional, usable extremity.
