Workforce Characteristics in Urology.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we holistically describe and characterize the current state of urology practice by evaluating compensation, workload and practice factors as they relate to our demographic makeup as a specialty. METHODS: We collaborated with the American Urological Association to query its domestic membership of practicing urologists regarding socioeconomic, workforce and quality of life issues. The survey consisted of 26 questions and took approximately 13 minutes to complete. A total of 733 responders had complete data for the factors statistically analyzed in the study. RESULTS: Mean yearly compensation for urologists surveyed was $404,755 and median compensation was $380,000 (IQR $300,000-480,000). Female respondents had a significantly lower median yearly compensation vs males ($318,422 vs $400,000) on univariate and multivariate analysis. Respondents reported a median of 60 work hours per week (IQR 50-60) and the median number of call days per month was 7 (IQR 5-10). Of the respondents 62% indicated that they use advanced practice providers in their practice. In addition, 30% reported employed status, 49% reported self-employed status and 21% reported academic status. Overall 20% of respondents plan to retire within 5 years and 40% within 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Higher income was associated with greater job satisfaction and hourly wage appeared to decrease at increased work hours per week. Several workplace and demographic factors drive compensation, number of hours worked per week, number of call days per month and job satisfaction.

Gender Differences in Compensation, Job Satisfaction and Other Practice Patterns in Urology.

PURPOSE: The proportion of women in urology has increased from less than 0.5% in 1981 to 10% today. Furthermore, 33% of students matching in urology are now female. In this analysis we characterize the female workforce in urology compared to that of men with regard to income, workload and job satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collaborated with the American Urological Association to survey its domestic membership of practicing urologists regarding socioeconomic, workforce and quality of life issues. A total of 6,511 survey invitations were sent via e-mail. The survey consisted of 26 questions and took approximately 13 minutes to complete. Linear regression models were used to evaluate bivariable and multivariable associations with job satisfaction and compensation. RESULTS: A total of 848 responses (660 or 90% male, 73 or 10% female) were collected for a total response rate of 13%. On bivariable analysis female urologists were younger (p <0.0001), more likely to be fellowship trained (p=0.002), worked in academics (p=0.008), were less likely to be self-employed and worked fewer hours (p=0.03) compared to male urologists. On multivariable analysis female gender was a significant predictor of lower compensation (p=0.001) when controlling for work hours, call frequency, age, practice setting and type, fellowship training and advance practice provider employment. Adjusted salaries among female urologists were $76,321 less than those of men. Gender was not a predictor of job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Female urologists are significantly less compensated compared to male urologists after adjusting for several factors likely contributing to compensation. There is no difference in job satisfaction between male and female urologists.

Factors Related to Job Satisfaction in Urology.

INTRODUCTION: There is little information on job satisfaction in the extant literature in urology. The purpose of this study is to examine 1) the current state of job satisfaction among urologists in the United States, and 2) the demographic and work place factors that have the greatest influence on satisfaction. METHODS: We collaborated with AUA (American Urological Association) to query its domestic membership of practicing urologists regarding socioeconomic, work force and quality of life issues. A total of 848 responses were collected for a total response rate of 13%. Linear regression models were used to evaluate bivariable and multivariable associations with job satisfaction scores on a 1 to 5 scale. RESULTS: Of providers 70% reported being satisfied, 63% reported that they would choose medicine again and 83% would choose urology again. Age and job satisfaction did not demonstrate a linear association on statistical analysis but rather a U-shaped relationship. On bivariate analysis significant factors associated with higher job satisfaction included younger and older age, higher income (p = 0.047), fewer call days (p = 0.006), fellowship training (p = 0.006) and academic practice (overall p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis age (younger and older ages) and academic practice remained significant predictors of job satisfaction (p = 0.01) as did higher income (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The current study helps describe the current state of job satisfaction among American urologists and examined work place factors that influence satisfaction. Income, hours worked, academic practice and age each have a significant impact on job satisfaction for the practicing urologist. Keeping abreast of the drivers of job satisfaction is critical to ensure that urologists continue to care for patients, perform research, educate future physicians and provide service to their communities.