Cytogenetic abnormalities predict survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a PDWP/EBMT study.

Poor-risk (PR) cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities generally direct pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). We assessed the predictive value of cytogenetic risk classification at diagnosis with respect to post-HSCT outcomes in pediatric patients. Patients younger than 18 years at the time of their first allogeneic HSCT for AML in CR1 between 2005 and 2022 who were reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry were subgrouped into four categories. Of the 845 pediatric patients included in this study, 36% had an 11q23 abnormality, 24% had monosomy 7/del7q or monosomy 5/del5q, 24% had a complex or monosomal karyotype, and 16% had other PR cytogenetic abnormalities. In a multivariable model, 11q23 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, P = 0.03) and other PR cytogenetic abnormalities (HR = 0.55, P = 0.02) were associated with significantly better overall survival when compared with monosomy 7/del7q or monosomy 5/del5q. Patients with other PR cytogenetic abnormalities had a lower risk of disease relapse after HSCT (HR = 0.49, P = 0.01) and, hence, better leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.55, P = 0.01). Therefore, we conclude that PR cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis predict overall survival after HSCT for AML in pediatric patients.

Genetic Findings of Potential Donor Origin following Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Recommendations on Donor Disclosure and Genetic Testing from the World Marrow Donor Association.

Following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), recipients are subjected to extensive genetic testing to monitor the efficacy of the transplantation and identify relapsing malignant disease. This testing is increasingly including the use of large gene panels, which may lead to incidental identification of genetic and molecular information of potential donor origin. Deciphering whether variants are of donor origin, and if so, whether there are clinical implications for the donor can prove challenging. In response to queries from donor registries and transplant centers regarding best practices in managing donors when genetic mutations of potential donor origin are identified, the Medical Working Group of the World Marrow Donor Association established an expert group to review available evidence and develop a framework to aid decision making. These guidelines aim to provide recommendations on predonation consenting, postdonation testing of recipients, and informing and managing donors when findings of potential donor origin are identified in recipients post-transplantation. It is recognized that registries will have different access to resources and financing structures, and thus whenever possible, we have made suggestions on how recommendations can be adapted.

Favorable recovery profiles and good reliability among youngest unrelated stem cell donors supports lowering the minimum donor registration age.

INTRODUCTION: Younger donor age in hematopoietic cell transplantation has been associated with improved overall and disease-free survival. Safety data on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and bone marrow (BM) donation is well established, including in the <18-year old age group in the related setting. In response, Anthony Nolan became the first stem cell donor registry to lower the minimum age for unrelated donors to 16-years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed unrelated donors donating PBSC or BM for the first time between April 2015 and October 2017 since adoption of the lowered recruitment age. Data were collected from registry electronic database and structured follow-up questionnaires. Primary outcomes were turnaround time from VT to donation, optimal cell yield achievement, and physical and emotional recovery. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1013 donors, there were no differences between the different age groups in proportion of donors achieving optimal CD34+ or TNC (PBSC and BM, respectively). There was no increased central line requirement for younger donors or increased emergency telephone support. Youngest donors were more likely to report physical recovery 2 and 7 days post-PBSC (P = .024 and P = .015, respectively) as well as an earlier emotional recovery (P = .001) and fewer physical symptoms 1 week BM donation (P = .04). CONCLUSION: This study shows that younger donors are as reliable as older donors, and have favorable recovery profiles without need for increased support at any stage of the donation, supporting Anthony Nolan recruitment strategy and offering reassurance to donor registries considering the same.

High lactate dehydrogenase at time of admission for allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation associates to poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Risk stratification is important for balancing potential risks and benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. We retrospectively studied 1119 patients undergoing allogenic-HSCT in a single center for five hematological indications assessing the prognostic role of LDH at admission for survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), higher than median LDH had an adverse effect on survival. The prognostic significance was strongest in AML, with higher LDH levels having lower 1-and 3-year survival 69.2% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.001 and 51.9% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, reduced 1-and 3-year PFS 62.4% vs. 42.1%, P < 0.001 48% vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, higher cumulative incidence of 1-and 3-year NRM 11% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01 and 15.7% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.04, and higher 1-and 3-year relapse incidence (RI) 26.7% vs. 40.7%, p < .0001 36.2% vs. 40.7%, respectively, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis LDH maintained significant prognostic capacity in OS, PFS and RI. These findings in AML, validated in an independent cohort, suggest that LDH is a readily available tool that could be integrated into transplant risk assessments to aid decision-making and identify high-risk patients who may benefit from post-transplant pharmacological or cellular strategies.