Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Migr Rev ; 25(1): 167-75, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12316775

ABSTRACT

PIP: The authors discuss issues to be considered in developing planning strategies for the 1991 census of Canada. Aspects considered include funding, respondents' willingness to cooperate, public distrust, quality maintenance, international cooperation, census content, and dissemination and research plans.^ieng


Subject(s)
Censuses , Health Planning , Americas , Canada , Developed Countries , North America , Organization and Administration , Population Characteristics , Research
2.
Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur ; 5(2): 135-57, 1988 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12285408

ABSTRACT

"A joint study by Statistics Canada and the U.S. Bureau of the Census examines special tabulations of U.S. residents born in Canada from the 1980 census of the United States and compares them with matching tabulations of Canadian residents born in the United States from the 1981 census of Canada. As might be expected, the two populations are remarkably similar and the preponderance of the migration flow is from Canada to the United States. The comparative social and economic characteristics of the two migrant stocks show the effects of increasing legal restrictions on migration between the two countries in the last two decades. The characteristics of the migrant flows have changed from large, unregulated population movements responding to economic motivations similar to internal migration flows to a much smaller, highly controlled movement more typical of long-distance international migration flows." This is a revised version of a paper originally presented at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.


Subject(s)
Economics , Emigration and Immigration , Motivation , Population Characteristics , Public Policy , Transients and Migrants , Americas , Behavior , Canada , Demography , Developed Countries , North America , Population , Population Dynamics , Psychology , Research , United States
3.
Int Migr Rev ; 21(4): 1038-66, 1987.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12280906

ABSTRACT

PIP: The Canada-US immigration project is an attempt to assess carefully the flows, trends, and characteristics of immigrants between the 2 countries. The primary focus for data is the census information derived from the 1980 US and 1981 Canadian censuses. Some observations of the comparison follow. 1) US-born immigrants tend to migrate later. 2) Immigrants have an older age structure than the total population. 3) The sex ratio pattern is similar with older migrants having lower ratios. 4) Immigration of elderly/retired is not a common pattern. 5) Changes in regional destinations is a basic feature of immigration flows. The destination of US immigrants shifted over time from northern states to southern states. Destinations of Canadian immigrants shifted over time from Quebec and prairie provinces to Ontario and British Columbia. 6) A higher proportion of US immigrants ever married and were widowed; higher proportions of Canadian immigrants divorced, and lower proportions separated. These aspects reflect age structure. 7) US immigrants' fertility is similar to the US population in general; Canadian immigrants' fertility is similar to the Canadian population in general. 8) US immigrants born in Canada have a considerably higher attainment. 9) Males aged 16-64 among US immigrants born in Canada have a consistently higher labor force participation rate. 10) Professional specialty occupations increase in importance in the 1975-1980 period in both countries. 11) Incomes of recent immigrants who were full-time, year-round workers from Canada or the US were well above the incomes of the native populations of either country. Comparability had to be examined in light of the variations built into the 2 censuses. Some of these issues are: 1) differences in sampling and collection methods, 2) differences in under/over-enumeration, 3) misreporting of country of birth, 4) differences in questions used, 5) different editing and imputation procedures applied, 6) variations in residence rules, and 7) the exclusion or inclusion of certain groups in the national census counts.^ieng


Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration , Research , Americas , Censuses , Demography , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , North America , Population , Population Characteristics , Population Dynamics , Transients and Migrants , United States
4.
Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur ; 4(1): 19-30, 1986 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12268277

ABSTRACT

PIP: Recent developments concerning censuses in Canada are described. Efforts to improve data quality in the 1981 census are first discussed. The authors explain how the 1986 census was approved, then cancelled, and finally reinstated. Consideration is given to data processing, costs, census products, and international cooperation on census problems^ieng


Subject(s)
Censuses , International Cooperation , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics as Topic , Americas , Canada , Developed Countries , Developing Countries , North America , Population Characteristics , Research , Research Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...