Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 75(3): 663-70, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22845346

ABSTRACT

Evidence suggests that probiotic bacteria modulate both innate and adaptive immunity in the host, and in some situations can result in reduced severity of common illnesses, such as acute rotavirus infection and respiratory infections. Responses to vaccination are increasingly being used to provide high quality information on the immunomodulatory effects of dietary components in humans. The present review focuses on the effect of probiotic administration upon vaccination response. The majority of studies investigating the impact of probiotics on responses to vaccination have been conducted in healthy adults, and at best they show modest effects of probiotics on serum or salivary IgA titres. Studies in infants and in elderly subjects are very limited, and it is too early to draw any firm conclusions regarding the potential for probiotics to act as adjuvants in vaccination. Although some studies are comparable in terms of duration of the intervention, age and characteristics of the subjects, most differ in terms of the probiotic selected. Further well designed, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed to understand fully the immunomodulatory properties of probiotics, whether the effects exerted are strain-dependent and age-dependent and their clinical relevance in enhancing immune protection following vaccination.


Subject(s)
Probiotics/administration & dosage , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Animals , Humans , Infant , Probiotics/pharmacology , Vaccination
2.
Microcirculation ; 18(5): 339-46, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21418384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of different COCs on endothelial function. BACKGROUND: COCs all contain ethinylestradiol, but different progestins; three of the more common progestins are DSG, LN, and DR. Ethinylestradiol enhances some measures of vascular reactivity, but certain progestins may increase risk of vascular diseases and impair endothelial vasodilation. METHODS: Twenty-nine healthy women taking COCs containing 30 µg ethinylestradiol and 150 µg DSG (Marvelon, n = 10), 150 µg LN (Microgynon, n = 10), or 3 mg DR (Yasmin, n = 9) had their vascular reactivity measured using various techniques during their pill-free week (days 5-7) and the third week of active pills (days 26-28). A reference group (n = 10) underwent the same measurements on two consecutive cycles. RESULTS: FMD and LDI were significantly higher during active-pill visits than pill-free visits in women taking DSG and DR (p < 0.02), but not in women taking LN. There were no differences between the duplicate measures in the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: COCs containing 150 µg DSG or 3 mg DR significantly increase endothelium-dependent vasodilation in both large vessels and peripheral microvasculature. These effects may be due to the progestins exhibiting differential effects on eNOS expression.


Subject(s)
Androstenes/administration & dosage , Desogestrel/administration & dosage , Endothelium, Vascular/enzymology , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic/drug effects , Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III/biosynthesis , Vasodilation/drug effects , Adult , Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Ethinyl Estradiol/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle/drug effects , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...