Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Cell Biochem ; 464(1-2): 181-191, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31758376

ABSTRACT

Notch is an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway with an important role in development and cell fate determination. Deregulation of Notch signaling has been associated with several pathological conditions, including cancer. Acting as an oncogene in some types of cancers and as a tumor suppressor in other, Notch effects seem to be highly context-dependent in solid tumors. In the present study, we aimed to investigate gene expression levels of Notch pathway constituents, including ligands, receptors, and target genes, during the early stages of inflammation-associated intestinal carcinogenesis. To achieve so, we used our recently developed mouse model, in which colon cancer arises in the absence of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) due to colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) treatment. Among the cell surface components, ligands Jag1/Jag2 and receptors Notch1/Notch2 were found to be significantly upregulated in the uPA-deficient protumorigenic inflammatory microenvironment. Moreover, several intracellular Notch modulators, i.e. Hes1, Hey1, and Klf4, were also shown to be deregulated with inflammation, yet irrespective of uPA status. Sox9 transcription factor, however, was significantly downregulated in the uPA-deficient/DSS-treated mice that developed colon adenomas as compared to the wild-type/DSS-treated group with no neoplasia identified. The latter finding supports a tumor suppressive role of Sox9 in intestinal carcinogenesis. Our results point towards an early activation of Notch signaling pathway at the receptor-ligand level in inflammation-associated colon neoplasmatogenesis developed in the absence of uPA. Interestingly, such activation may not be accompanied by deregulation of downstream Notch-target genes, possibly due to the effects of other inter-related signaling pathways.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Receptor, Notch1/biosynthesis , Receptor, Notch2/biosynthesis , Signal Transduction , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/deficiency , Animals , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Kruppel-Like Factor 4 , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Receptor, Notch1/genetics , Receptor, Notch2/genetics
2.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 24(2): 171-80, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19788565

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the effect of theophylline along the rabbit gastrointestinal tract in comparison with the pharmacodynamic effect produced by the combined application of its three major metabolites. At concentrations up to 10(-3) m, theophylline relaxed, in a declining order from the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) to pylorus, all regions of the upper gastrointestinal tract, but only the ascending colon from the intestinal regions studied. At concentrations higher than 10(-3) m, instead of relaxing, theophylline strongly contracted the antrum and pylorus. In all three small intestinal regions, at concentrations up to 10(-3) m, theophylline produced a weak contraction, which at higher concentrations became very strong, and at 10(-2) m was comparable to that produced by a supramaximal dose of acetylcholine. The additive relaxing effect resulting from the combined application of the theophylline's metabolites was, from oesophagus to pylorus, weaker than that produced by theophylline, while on the ascending colon it was comparable to that of the parent drug. In contrast, the additive contractile effect of the metabolites on the three small intestinal regions was four to five times higher the one produced by theophylline. In conclusion, this study shows that the additive effect of the combined application of theophylline's major metabolites on the rabbit gastrointestinal tract plays a major role in the final response of the intestine, and a minor one in the final responses of the gastric regions, while both the parent drug and the metabolites contribute to the final responses of the oesophagus and LOS.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Theophylline/pharmacology , Acetylcholine/administration & dosage , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Animals , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle Relaxation/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Rabbits , Theophylline/administration & dosage , Theophylline/metabolism
3.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 22(5): 537-47, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18844725

ABSTRACT

The present study, aimed to clarify whether the gastrointestinal adverse effects following administration of the bronchodilator theophylline are owing to the action of the drug itself or its metabolites, investigates the pharmacodymanic effects of theophylline's metabolites on the spontaneous contractility in the rabbit upper gastrointestinal tract. Comparative examination reveals that while two of the metabolites, namely 1-methylxanthine (1-MX) and 3-methylxanthine (3-MX), cause a similar, but less pronounced than the parent drug, concentration-dependent relaxation on the isolated oesophagus, lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS), fundus, antrum and pylorus, the remaining two metabolites, 1,3-dimethyluric acid (1,3-DMU) and 1-methyluric acid (1-MU), produce either a weak stimulating effect, or an even weaker relaxation. The relaxation which is muscle-mediated, non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) and nitric oxide (NO)-independent is probably mediated via inhibition of the metabolites on phosphodiesterases (PDEs), while a presynaptic cholinergic pathway is involved in the weak stimulating effect. The effects of all substances are additive. As a consequence, the net result of the cumulative action of all metabolites in the oesophagus, LOS, antrum and pylorus is, at 10(-3) m, comparable with that of theophylline, but in the fundus it is lower than that of the parent drug, because in the latter tissue the stimulating effect of 1,3-DMU and 1-MU counteracts the relaxing effect of the other two metabolites. However, combination of the parent drug with its metabolites leads to a considerable relaxation in all the gastrointestinal regions extending from the oesophagus to pylorus. Conclusively, upper gastrointestinal adverse effects following theophylline's administration are also because of theophylline's metabolites.


Subject(s)
Muscle Contraction/physiology , Muscle Relaxation/physiology , Theophylline/metabolism , Theophylline/pharmacology , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/drug effects , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , In Vitro Techniques , Male , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle Relaxation/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/metabolism , Rabbits
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...