Temporal Changes in Quality Indicators in a Regional System of Care After Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: Historically, quality-of-care monitoring was performed separately for transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR, SAVR). Using consensus indicators, we provide a global report on the quality of care for treatment of aortic stenosis across the highest-volume treatments: transfemoral (TF) TAVR, isolated SAVR, and SAVR combined with coronary artery bypass graft. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients in a regional system of care. Primary endpoint was 30-day and 1-year mortality (2015-2019). Secondary endpoints included rate of new pacemaker, rate of readmission, and length of stay (2012-2019). Following multivariable logistic regressions, we developed mortality case-mix adjustment models to report risk estimates. Results: The proportion of patients receiving TAVR grew from 32% to 53% (2015-2019). Those receiving TF TAVR were significantly older, with higher rates of comorbidities. Observed 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality after TF TAVR decreased from 3.1% to 0.6% (P = 0.03), and 13.6% to 6.6% (P = 0.09), respectively; surgical mortality rates for isolated SAVR and SAVR combined with coronary artery bypass graft were low and did not change significantly over time, ranging from 0.3% to 1.4% and from 0.9% to 3.4%, respectively at 30 days, and from 0.9% to 3.4% and from 4.7% to 6.7 at 1 year. In the TF TAVR cohort, the observed vs expected ratio for 30-day and 1-year mortality decreased significantly from 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9, 3.5) to 0.3 (95% CI 0.1, 0.8), and from 1.3 (95% CI 0.9, 1.7) to 0.7 (95% CI 0.5, 0.99), respectively; no change occurred in risk-adjusted surgical mortality. Conclusions: Consensus quality indicators provide unique insights on the quality of care for patients receiving treatment for aortic stenosis.

Contexte: Par le passé, la surveillance de la qualité des soins était réalisée séparément pour l'implantation valvulaire aortique par cathéter (IVAC) et la chirurgie de remplacement valvulaire aortique (CRVA). À l'aide d'indicateurs consensuels, nous dressons un rapport général de la qualité des soins dans les traitements les plus courants de la sténose aortique : IVAC fémorale, CRVA seule et CRVA combinée à un pontage coronarien. Méthodologie: Une étude de cohorte observationnelle et rétrospective a été menée pour évaluer les patients consécutifs ayant fréquenté un système de santé régional. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le taux de mortalité à 30 jours et à 1 an (2015 à 2019). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient le taux de nouveaux sti-mulateurs cardiaques, le taux de réadmission et la durée du séjour (2012 à 2019). Après des régressions logistiques multivariées, nous avons élaboré des modèles d'ajustement selon les groupes de cas pour le taux de mortalité afin d'estimer les risques. Résultats: La proportion de patients qui ont subi une IVAC est passée de 32 % à 53 % (2015 à 2019). Les patients qui ont subi une IVAC transfémorale étaient significativement plus vieux que ceux des autres groupes et présentaient un plus haut taux d'affections concomitantes. Les taux de mortalité de toute cause observés à 30 jours et à 1 an après une IVAC transfémorale ont respectivement diminué de 3,1 % à 0,6 % (P = 0,03) et de 13,6 % à 6,6 % (P = 0,09). Les taux de mortalité pour une CRVA seule et une CRVA combinée à un pontage coronarien étaient faibles et n'ont pas changé de manière significative au fil du temps : les taux de mortalité à 30 jours sont passés de 0,3 % à 1,4 % et de 0,9 % à 3,4 %, respectivement, et les taux de mortalité à 1 an, de 0,9 % à 3,4 % et de 4,7 % à 6,7 %, respectivement. Dans la cohorte ayant subi une IVAC transfémorale, le rapport du taux de mortalité observé par rapport au taux de mortalité attendu à 30 jours et à 1 an a diminué de manière significative, soit de 1,9 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % : 0,9 à 3,5) à 0,3 (IC à 95 % : 0,1 à 0,8), et de 1,3 (IC à 95 % : 0,9 à 1,7) à 0,7 (IC à 95 % : 0,5 à 0,99), respectivement. Aucune variation n'a été notée quant au taux de mortalité ajusté selon les risques pour une intervention chirurgicale. Conclusions: Les indicateurs consensuels de la qualité fournissent des informations uniques sur la qualité des soins chez les patients traités pour une sténose aortique.

Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Study of Patients in British Columbia, Canada.

Importance: Although the long-term survival advantage of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) vs the standard use of left internal thoracic artery (LITA) supplemented by saphenous vein grafts (LITA+SVG) has been demonstrated in several observational studies, to our knowledge its safety and other long-term clinical benefits in a large, population-based cohort are unknown. Objective: To compare the safety and long-term outcomes of MAG vs LITA+SVG among overall and selected subgroups of patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based observational study, we included 20 076 adult patients with triple-vessel or left-main disease who underwent primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (MAG, n = 5580; LITA+SVG, n = 14 496) in the province of British Columbia, Canada, from January 2000 to December 2014, with follow-up to December 2015. We performed propensity-score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression to minimize treatment selection bias. Exposures: Multiple arterial grafting or LITA+SVG. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke. Results: Of 5580 participants who underwent MAG, 586 (11%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 60 (8.7) years. Of 14 496 participants who underwent LITA+SVG, 2803 (19%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 68 (8.9) years. The median (interquartile range) follow-up time was 9.1 (5.1-12.6) years and 8.1 (4.5-11.7) years for the groups receiving MAG and LITA+SVG, respectively. Compared with LITA+SVG, MAG was associated with reduced mortality rates (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87) and repeated revascularization rates (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.84) in 15-year follow-up and reduced incidences of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85) and heart failure (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.98) in 7-year follow-up. The long-term benefits were coherent by all 3 statistical methods and persisted among patient subgroups with diabetes, obesity, moderately impaired ejection fraction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, or renal disease. Multiple arterial grafting was not associated with increased morbidity or mortality rates at 30 days overall or within patient subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with LITA+SVG, MAG is associated with reduced mortality, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction, and heart failure among patients with multivessel disease who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting without increased mortality or other adverse events at 30 days. The long-term benefits consistently observed across multiple outcomes and subgroups support the consideration of MAG for a broader spectrum of patients who are undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in routine practice.

Sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction: time trends from 1994 to 2003 in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Studies before the turn of the century reported sex differences in procedure rates. It is unknown whether these differences persist. OBJECTIVES: To examine time trends and sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients 20 years of age or older who were admitted to hospital in British Columbia with an AMI between April 1, 1994, and March 31, 2003. Segmented regression analysis was used to examine the inflection point of the time trend in 90-day catheterization rates post-AMI. Multivariable Cox regression modelling was used to evaluate sex differences in receiving catheterization and revascularization following AMI. RESULTS: Ninety-day coronary catheterization rates increased significantly over the study period for both men and women (P<0.0001 for trend), with a steeper increase beginning in September 2000. Women were less likely to undergo catheterization than men, even after adjustment for baseline differences; this sex effect was modified by age and care in the intensive care unit or cardiac care unit (ICU/CCU). Specifically, ICU/CCU admission eliminated the sex difference among patients who were younger than 65 years of age. Conditional on receiving cardiac catheterization post-AMI, female sex was not associated with a lower likelihood of receiving revascularization within one year (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent increases in catheterization rates post-AMI, women were less likely to undergo catheterization than men. Interestingly, access to ICU/CCU care removed the sex difference in catheterization access in patients younger than 65 years of age.

HISTORIQUE : Les études menées au tournant du siècle faisaient état de différences de taux d'interventions selon les sexes. On ne sait pas si ces différences persistent. OBJECTIFS : Examiner les tendances dans le temps et les différences selon les sexes du cathétérisme coronarien et de la revascularisation après un infarctus aigu du myocarde (IAM). MÉTHODOLOGIE : Les chercheurs ont procédé à une analyse rétrospective de tous les patients de 20 ans ou plus hospitalisés en Colombie-Britannique en raison d'un IAM entre le 1 avril 1994 et le 31 mars 2003. L'analyse de régression segmentée a permis d'examiner le point d'inflexion de la tendance dans le temps des taux de cathétérisme 90 jours après un IAM. Le modèle de régression de Cox multivariable a permis d'évaluer les différences d'administration de cathétérisme et de revascularisation selon les sexes après un IAM. RÉSULTATS : Les taux de cathétérismes coronaires au bout de 90 jours ont considérablement augmenté pendant la période de l'étude, tant chez les hommes que chez les femmes (P<0,0001 en matière de tendance), l'augmentation étant plus marquée à compter de septembre 2000. Les femmes étaient moins susceptibles de subir un cathétérisme que les hommes, même après rajustement des différences de départ. Cet effet attribuable au sexe changeait selon l'âge et les soins à l'unité de soins intensifs ou de soins cardiaques (USI-USC). Notamment, l'hospitalisation à l'USI-USC éliminait la différence selon les sexes chez les patients de moins de 65 ans. Sous réserve d'avoir reçu un cathétérisme cardiaque après l'IAM, le sexe féminin ne s'associait pas à une diminution de la probabilité d'avoir reçu une revascularisation au bout d'un an (FC 0,96; 95 % IC 0,91 à 1,02). CONCLUSIONS : Malgré l'augmentation récente du taux de cathétérisme après un IAM, les femmes étaient moins susceptibles de subir un cathétérisme que les hommes. Fait intéressant, l'accès à l'USI-USC faisait disparaître la différence d'accès au cathétérisme chez les patients de moins de 65 ans.

A proposed clinical model for efficient utilization of invasive coronary angiography.

More than 1/4 of patients who undergo invasive coronary angiography are found to have no visible or nonobstructive (<50% stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD). With the rapid evolution of noninvasive imaging for CAD diagnosis, avoiding invasive coronary angiography in patients unlikely to require coronary revascularization is desirable. We undertook to develop a clinical prediction tool to identify patients with a low likelihood of obstructive (> or =50% stenosis) CAD. The derivation cohort included 24,637 patients with a diagnosis of "stable angina" or "acute coronary syndrome" referred for first cardiac catheterization in the province of British Columbia, Canada. The model was validated using an external dataset from the province of Alberta and comprised 18,606 patients. Seven variables (female gender, age <50 years, atypical Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class, absence of ST-segment change on electrocardiogram, lifelong nonsmoking, and absence of diabetes and hyperlipidemia) were associated with the angiographic finding of "no or nonobstructive CAD." The c-statistics for the derivation model were 0.76 and 0.74 using the validation dataset. In conclusion, this simple clinical prediction tool, applied to patients for whom determination of coronary anatomy was clinically indicated, identifies patients who have a low likelihood of obstructive CAD. The patient population identified by this tool may represent a population best suited to a noninvasive diagnostic strategy.

The ability of heart failure specialists to accurately predict NT-proBNP levels based on clinical assessment and a previous NT-proBNP measurement.

BACKGROUND: The value of routine aminoterminal pro type B natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements in outpatient clinics remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the accuracy with which heart failure (HF) specialists can predict NT-proBNP levels in HF outpatients based on clinical assessment. METHODS: We prospectively studied 160 consecutive HF patients followed in an outpatient multidisciplinary HF clinic. During a regular office visit, HF specialists were asked to estimate a patient's current NT-proBNP level based upon their clinical assessment and all available information from their chart, including a previous NT-proBNP level (if available). NT-proBNP estimations were grouped into prognostic categories (<125, 125-1000, 1000-4998, or >/=4999 pg/mL) and comparisons made between actual and estimate values. RESULTS: Overall, HF specialists estimated 67.5% of NT-proBNP levels correctly. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, knowledge of a prior NT-proBNP measurement was the only significant predictor of estimation accuracy (p=0.01). Compared to patients with a prior NT-proBNP level <125 pg/mL, physicians were 95% less likely to get a correct estimation in patients with the highest prior NT-proBNP level (>/=4999 pg/mL). CONCLUSION: HF specialists are reasonably accurate at estimating current NT-proBNP levels based upon clinical assessment and a previous NT-proBNP level, if those levels were < 4999 pg/mL. Likely, initial but not routine NT-proBNP measurements are useful in outpatient HF clinics.

Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: sex differences in outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated that women with nonobstructive coronary disease have a high rate of subsequent investigations, rehospitalizations for recurrent chest pain, and repeat coronary angiography. The sex specificity of this finding is unclear. We therefore undertook an evaluation of sex differences in rehospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or chest pain in patients with "angiographically normal" coronaries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected angiographic and clinical data on all patients in British Columbia, Canada, presenting for their first cardiac catheterization with suspected ischemic heart disease but angiographically normal coronaries. RESULTS: Among 32,856 patients, 7.1% of men versus 23.3% of women were angiographically normal (P < .001). Among angiographically normal patients, women were older and more likely to present with hypertension, prior stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease than men, but Canadian Cardiovascular Society class of angina did not vary by sex. Within 1 year, 1.0% died, (19 women, 18 men, P = .27) and 0.6% had a stroke (13 women, 9 men, P = .91). Readmission to hospital for ACS or chest pain requiring catheterization was significantly higher in women compared to men (adjusted OR 4.06; 95% CI 1.15-14.31). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary, population-based cohort presenting for cardiac catheterization for suspected ischemia, women with angiographically normal coronaries were >4 times more likely to be readmitted to hospital for ACS/chest pain within 180 days compared to men. The observed sex difference has important social and economic implications and suggests that traditional diagnostic methods may not be optimal for women.

Significant improvement in short-term mortality in women undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (1991 to 2004).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate gender differences and trends in 30-day mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Evidence for gender differences in short-term mortality after CABG is conflicting. Many studies were from single centers, included highly selected populations, or had limited clinical information for adequate covariate adjustment. We undertook a population-based analysis using detailed clinical data on all adults undergoing CABG in the province of British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: The study population comprised all residents 20 years and older who underwent isolated CABG between 1991 and 2004. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between gender and 30-day mortality; time trend analysis was conducted by Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 20,229 men and 4,983 women. Women were older and had more comorbid conditions than men, but had better ejection fractions and less extensive coronary disease. Thirty-day mortality decreased significantly in men (2.4% to 1.9%) and women (5.6% to 1.9%) over the 14-year study period. Overall, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in women (3.6% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001), and adjustment for baseline differences did not remove this difference (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.75). Adjustment for body surface area, an intrinsic gender difference, further attenuated the relationship (odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.64). CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day mortality after CABG decreased significantly between 1991 and 2004, especially in women, suggesting that the gender difference in short-term outcomes is diminishing. The overall 42% higher mortality risk in women seems to be partially mediated through body surface area, a surrogate for vessel size.