Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fertil Steril ; 115(2): 348-362, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32977940

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To design protein phosphatase 1 (PP1)-disrupting peptides covalently coupled to inert cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) as sychnologically organized bioportide constructs as a strategy to modulate sperm motility. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Academic research laboratory. PATIENT(S)/ANIMAL(S): Normozoospermic men providing samples for routine analysis and Holstein Frisian bulls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Effect of the bioportides on the activity and interactions of PP1γ2-a PP1 isoform expressed exclusively in testicular germ cells and sperm-and on sperm vitality and motility. RESULT(S): PP1-disrupting peptides were designed based on the sequences from: 1) a sperm-specific PP1 interactor (A kinase anchor protein 4); and 2) a PP1 inhibitor (protein phosphatase inhibitor 2). Those sequences were covalently coupled to inert CPPs as bioportide constructs, which were successfully delivered to the flagellum of sperm cells to induce a marked impact on PP1γ2 activity and sperm motility. Molecular modeling studies further facilitated the identification of an optimized PP1-binding sequence and enabled the development of a modified stop-sperm bioportide with reduced size and increased potency of action. In addition, a bioportide mimetic of the unique 22-amino acid C-terminus of PP1γ2 accumulated within spermatozoa to significantly reduce sperm motility and further define the PP1γ2-specific interactome. CONCLUSION(S): These investigations demonstrate the utility of CPPs to deliver peptide sequences that target unique protein-protein interactions in spermatozoa to achieve a significant impact upon spermatozoa motility, a key prognostic indicator of male fertility.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents, Male/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Protein Phosphatase 1/antagonists & inhibitors , Sperm Motility/drug effects , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Cattle , Contraceptive Agents, Male/chemistry , Humans , Male , Peptide Fragments/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/genetics , Protein Phosphatase 1/chemistry , Protein Phosphatase 1/metabolism , Protein Structure, Secondary , Sperm Motility/physiology , Spermatogenesis/drug effects , Spermatogenesis/physiology
2.
Hum Reprod ; 30(12): 2737-46, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26453676

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Are significant abnormalities of CatSper function present in IVF patients with normal sperm concentration and motility and if so what is their functional significance for fertilization success? SUMMARY ANSWER: Sperm with a near absence of CatSper current failed to respond to activation of CatSper by progesterone and there was fertilization failure at IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In human spermatozoa, Ca(2+) influx induced by progesterone is mediated by CatSper, a sperm-specific Ca(2+) channel. A suboptimal Ca(2+) influx is significantly associated with, and more prevalent in, men with abnormal semen parameters, and is associated with reduced fertilizing capacity. However, abnormalities in CatSper current can only be assessed directly using electrophysiology. There is only one report of a CatSper-deficient man who showed no progesterone potentiated CatSper current. A CatSper 2 genetic abnormality was present but there was no information on the [Ca(2+)]i response to CatSper activation by progesterone. Additionally, the semen samples had indicating significant abnormalities (oligoasthenoteratozoospermia) multiple suboptimal functional responses in the spermatozoon. As such it cannot be concluded that impaired CatSper function alone causes infertility or that CatSper blockade is a potential safe target for contraception. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Spermatozoa were obtained from donors and subfertile IVF patients attending a hospital assisted reproductive techniques clinic between January 2013 and December 2014. In total 134 IVF patients, 28 normozoospermic donors and 10 patients recalled due to a history of failed/low fertilization at IVF took part in the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Samples were primarily screened using the Ca(2+) influx induced by progesterone and, if cell number was sufficient, samples were also assessed by hyperactivation and penetration into viscous media. A defective Ca(2+) response to progesterone was defined using the 99% confidence interval from the distribution of response amplitudes in normozoospermic donors. Samples showing a defective Ca(2+) response were further examined in order to characterize the potential CatSper abnormalities. In men where there was a consistent and robust failure of calcium signalling, a direct assessment of CatSper function was performed using electrophysiology (patch clamping), and a blood sample was obtained for genetic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 101/102 (99%) IVF patients and 22/23 (96%) donors exhibited a normal Ca(2+) response. The mean (± SD) normalized peak response did not differ between donors and IVF patients (2.57 ± 0.68 [n = 34 ejaculates from 23 different donors] versus 2.66 ± 0.68 [n = 102 IVF patients], P = 0.63). In recall patients, 9/10 (90%) showed a normal Ca(2+) response. Three men were initially identified with a defective Ca(2+) influx. However, only one (Patient 1) had a defective response in repeat semen samples. Electrophysiology experiments on sperm from Patient 1 showed a near absence of CatSper current and exon screening demonstrated no mutations in the coding regions of the CatSper complex. There was no increase in penetration of viscous media when the spermatozoa were stimulated with progesterone and importantly there was failed fertilization at IVF. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A key limitation relates to working with a specific functional parameter (Ca(2+) influx induced by progesterone) in fresh sperm samples from donors and patients that have limited viability. Therefore, for practical, technical and logistical reasons, some men (∼ 22% of IVF patients) could not be screened. As such the incidence of significant Ca(2+) abnormalities induced by progesterone may be higher than the ∼ 1% observed here. Additionally, we used a strict definition of a defective Ca(2+) influx such that only substantial abnormalities were selected for further study. Furthermore, electrophysiology was only performed on one patient with a robust and repeatable defective calcium response. This man had negligible CatSper current but more subtle abnormalities (e.g. currents present but significantly smaller) may have been present in men with either normal or below normal Ca(2+) influx. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These data add significantly to the understanding of the role of CatSper in human sperm function and its impact on male fertility. Remarkably, these findings provide the first direct evidence that CatSper is a suitable and specific target for human male contraception.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channels/metabolism , Calcium Signaling/genetics , Fertilization/physiology , Infertility, Male/metabolism , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Adult , Calcium Channels/genetics , Calcium Signaling/drug effects , Fertilization/genetics , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Male , Progesterone/pharmacology , Sperm Count , Spermatozoa/drug effects
3.
Hum Reprod ; 28(7): 1874-89, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23585561

ABSTRACT

STUDY QUESTION: Do cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) translocate into spermatozoa and, if so, could they be utilized to deliver a much larger protein cargo? SUMMARY ANSWER: Chemically diverse polycationic CPPs rapidly and efficiently translocate into spermatozoa. They exhibit differential accumulation within intracellular compartments without detrimental influences upon cellular viability or motility but they are relatively ineffective in transporting larger proteins. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Endocytosis, the prevalent route of protein internalization into eukaryotic cells, is severely compromised in mature spermatozoa. Thus, the translocation of many bioactive agents into sperm is relatively inefficient. However, the delivery of bioactive moieties into mature spermatozoa could be significantly improved by the identification and utility of an efficient and inert vectorial delivery technology. STUDY DESIGN: CPP translocation efficacies, their subsequent differential intracellular distribution and the influence of peptides upon viability were determined in bovine spermatozoa. Temporal analyses of sperm motility in the presence of exogenously CPPs utilized normozoospermic human donor samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CPPs were prepared by manual, automated and microwave-enhanced solid phase synthesis. Confocal fluorescence microscopy determined the intracellular distribution of rhodamine-conjugated CPPs in spermatozoa. Quantitative uptake and kinetic analyses compared the translocation efficacies of chemically diverse CPPs and conjugates of biotinylated CPPs and avidin. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) conversion assays were employed to analyse the influence of CPPs upon sperm cell viability and sperm class assays determined the impact of CPPs on motility in capacitated and non-capacitated human samples. MAIN RESULTS: Chemically heterogeneous CPPs readily translocated into sperm to accumulate within discrete intracellular compartments. Mitoparan (INLKKLAKL(Aib)KKIL), for example, specifically accumulated within the mitochondria located in the sperm midpiece. The unique plasma membrane composition of sperm is a critical factor that directly influences the uptake efficacy of structurally diverse CPPs. No correlations in efficacies were observed when comparing CPP uptake into sperm with either uptake into fibroblasts or direct translocation across a phosphatidylcholine membrane. These comparative investigations identified C105Y (CSIPPEVKFNKPFVYLI) as a most efficient pharmacokinetic modifier for general applications in sperm biology. Significantly, CPP uptake induced no detrimental influence upon either bovine sperm viability or the motility of human sperm. As a consequence of the lack of endocytotic machinery, the CPP-mediated delivery of much larger protein complexes into sperm is relatively inefficient when compared with the similar process in fibroblasts. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: It is possible that some CPPs could directly influence aspects of sperm biology and physiology that were not analysed in this study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: CPP technologies have significant potential to deliver selected bioactive moieties and so could modulate the biology and physiology of human sperm biology both prior- and post-fertilization.


Subject(s)
Cell-Penetrating Peptides/metabolism , Sperm Motility , Spermatozoa/metabolism , Animals , Cattle , Cell Membrane Permeability , Endocytosis , Humans , Male , Mice , NIH 3T3 Cells , Protein Transport
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...