Vomiting and recovery after outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children. Comparison of four anesthetic techniques using nitrous oxide with halothane or propofol.

BACKGROUND: The authors' purpose in this study was to compare prospectively four different anesthetic induction and maintenance techniques using nitrous oxide with halothane and/or propofol for vomiting and recovery after outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy procedures in children. METHODS: Eighty unpremedicated children, aged 3-10 yr, were assigned randomly to four groups: group H/H, 0.5-2% halothane induction/halothane maintenance; group P/P, 3-5 mg.kg-1 propofol induction and 0.1-0.3 mg.kg-1.min-1 propofol maintenance; group H/P, 0.1-0.3 mg.kg-1.min-1 halothane induction/propofol maintenance; and group P/H, 3-5 mg.kg-1 propofol induction and 0.5-2% halothane maintenance. Nitrous oxide (67%) and oxygen (33%) were administered in all the groups. Other treatments and procedures were standardized intra- and postoperatively. Results of postoperative vomiting and recovery were analyzed in the first 6 h and beyond 6 h. RESULTS: Logistic regression showed that vomiting occurred 3.5 times as often when halothane was used for maintenance of anesthesia (groups H/H and P/H) compared with the use of propofol (groups P/P and H/P; Odds Ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval 1.3 and 9.4, respectively; P = 0.012). A significant association between vomiting ( < 6 h: yes/no) and discharge times ( > 6 h: yes/no) (Odd's Ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 12.4, respectively) (P = 0.046) was shown. However, no significant differences among the groups in the incidence of vomiting beyond 6 h, recurrent vomiting, or hospital discharge times were shown. CONCLUSIONS: After tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy procedures, despite reduced postoperative vomiting with use of propofol rather than halothane, along with nitrous oxide for anesthetic maintenance, the authors found no differences in "true" endpoints such as unplanned admissions or discharge times. Among the groups, the main factor that delayed hospital discharge beyond 6 h was vomiting within the first 6 h.

Timing of caudal block placement in relation to surgery does not affect duration of postoperative analgesia in paediatric ambulatory patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine if the timing of caudal block placement in relation to surgery affected either the duration of postoperative pain relief or the discharge time in children undergoing brief ambulatory surgical procedures. Forty ASA physical status I or II children ages 18 mo to 11 yr were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 patients received a caudal block with 0.5 ml.kg-1 of bupivacaine 0.25 per cent following the induction of anaesthesia but before the onset of surgery. Group 2 patients received a similar block at the completion of surgery but before emergence from general anaesthesia. An experienced observer, who was not aware of the timing of block placement, observed all patients from arrival to the post-anaesthetic recovery room until discharge from the ambulatory surgery unit. Pain was assessed at five-minute intervals using an Objective Pain Scale. No statistically significant differences were noted between Group 1 and Group 2 patients with regard to their postoperative pain/discomfort scores, the need for postoperative narcotic analgesia, or the time required for either group to meet standard discharge criteria. It is concluded that the duration of postoperative analgesia is not impaired by placing the caudal block prior to the start of a brief surgical procedure.