Relationships between mesopic visual sensitivity and macular inner and outer retinal layer thickness in healthy younger, middle-aged and older adults.

PURPOSE: To examine relationships between mesopic visual sensitivity measurements on microperimetry and macular inner and outer retinal layer (IRL and ORL) thicknesses in healthy younger, middle-aged and older subjects. METHODS: In total, 154 healthy adults were divided into three age groups each with similar mean sensitivity. Regional retinal sensitivity (determined by mesopic fundus-controlled microperimetry) and IRL (ganglion cell-related layer) and ORL thicknesses were measured in the five subfields: central fovea (1 mm diameter) and the quadrants temporal, nasal, superior and inferior of a parafoveal ring of outer diameter 3 mm and inner diameter 1 mm. Relationships between regional sensitivity and corresponding IRL and ORL thicknesses were assessed through a univariate and multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: Visual sensitivity means for each subfield differed across age groups (all p < 0.001). In each parafoveal ring quadrant, mean IRL thickness was reduced in the older eyes compared to the other groups (all p < 0.0001). In the inferior region, worse sensitivity was correlated with greater IRL thickness (p = 0.0207) in the middle-aged group and with a thicker ORL (p < 0.0001) and thinner IRL (p = 0.0003) in the older eyes (R2 = 0.51). The slopes of regression lines relating sensitivity to IRL thickness and age group (p = 0.0027) or to ORL thickness and age group (p = 0.0020) differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship observed between mesopic visual sensitivity and retinal layer thickness varied with age. A worse sensitivity was related to a thicker macular IRL layer in middle-aged eyes and to a thicker ORL and thinner IRL in older eyes.

Relationship Between Flicker Modulation Sensitivity and Retinal Ganglion Cell Related Layer Thicknesses.

Purpose: Early detection of structural changes in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and corresponding changes in visual function is important in early degenerative diseases of the retina, but the sensitivity of both measurements is limited by the inherent variability in healthy subjects. This study investigates the relationships between RGC-related layer thicknesses and foveal and parafoveal flicker modulation sensitivity (FMS) across photopic and mesopic light levels in healthy subjects. Methods: Photopic and mesopic FMS was measured in 56 young adults, at the point of fixation and at an eccentricity of 5 degrees, in each of the four quadrants. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was used to measure retinal thicknesses. Relationships between foveal and parafoveal FMS and the retinal thickness in the corresponding region were examined after adjusting for confounding variables. Results: Total macular and inner retinal layer (IRL) thicknesses in the parafoveal ring were significant predictors of photopic (P = 0.034) and mesopic (P = 0.034) parafoveal FMS, respectively. The superior peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness was a contributing factor to the inferior parafoveal FMS (photopic: P = 0.006 and mesopic: P = 0.021) and the inferior pRNFL thickness was also a contributing factor to the superior parafoveal FMS (photopic: P < 0.001 and mesopic: P = 0.015). Conclusions: The pRNFL thicknesses predict parafoveal FMS for both mesopic and photopic conditions in healthy eyes. Translational Relevance: The measurement of rapid flicker sensitivity in the parafoveal retina together with the pRNFL thickness profiles measured before the onset of disease, may provide a more sensitive biomarker for detecting loss of sensitivity caused by the earliest neurodegenerative changes in the eyes.

Symptoms associated with reading from a smartphone in conditions of light and dark.

Asthenopia symptoms were investigated in visually-normal subjects without computer-related vision symptoms after prolonged reading from: smartphone versus hardcopy under photopic conditions, and smartphone in conditions of ambient versus dark room illumination. After reading from the smartphone, total symptom scores and nine out of ten questionnaire symptoms were significantly worse than for the hardcopy ("blurred vision while viewing the text, "blurred distance vision after the task", "difficulty in refocusing from one distance to another", "irritated or burning eyes", "dry eyes", "eyestrain", "tired eyes", "sensitivity to bright lights" and "eye discomfort"). Mean total symptom scores and scores for "irritated or burning eyes" and "dry eyes" were significantly higher for the dark versus photopic conditions. In conclusion, prolonged smartphone reading could cause worse asthenopic symptoms than reading from a hardcopy under similar conditions. Symptoms could be even worse when reading from a smartphone in the dark.

Capacity of straylight and disk halo size to diagnose cataract.

PURPOSE: To examine the capacity of straylight and disk halo size to diagnose cataract. SETTING: Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Straylight, disk halo radius, and high-contrast corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) measurements were compared between patients with age-related cataract and age-matched normal-sighted control subjects by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic. RESULTS: Measurements were made in 53 eyes of 53 patients with a mean age of 67.94 years ± 7.11 (SD) and 31 eyes of 31 controls with a mean age 66.06 ± 5.43 years. Significantly worse (P < .001) mean straylight (1.38 ± 0.24 log[s]), mean disk halo radius (2.40 ± 0.18 log minutes of arc [arcmin]), and mean CDVA (0.17 ± 0.11 logMAR) were recorded in the cataract group than in the control group (1.17 ± 0.11 log[s], 2.10 ± 0.16 log arcmin, and 0.08 ± 0.08 logMAR). Significant differences in AUCs were observed for disk halo radius (0.89 ± 0.04) versus straylight (0.77 ± 0.05) (P = .03) and disk halo radius versus CDVA (0.72 ± 0.05) (P = .001). The comparison of disk halo radius versus the discriminant function with input from CDVA and straylight (0.80 ± 0.05) was at the limit of significance only (0.091 ± 0.05, P = .051). CONCLUSION: Although all 3 variables discriminated well between normal eyes and eyes with cataract, the disk halo radius showed the best diagnostic capacity. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Repeatability of mesopic visual acuity measurements using high- and low-contrast ETDRS letter charts.

PURPOSE: To determine the repeatability of mesopic high-contrast (HC) and low-contrast (LC) visual acuity (VA) measurements made at distance and near in healthy young individuals. While the repeatability of photopic VA is well-known, there is a lack of information with regard to the repeatability of VA measured under low luminance conditions. METHODS: In two different sessions 1 week apart, best-corrected monocular VA was determined using HC (96 %) and LC (10 %) ETDRS charts under mesopic luminance conditions (0.75 cd/m(2)) at distance (HCD, LCD) and near (HCN, LCN) in 47 healthy subjects aged 22.9 ± 6.8 years. Repeatability was estimated by the Bland and Altman method, whereby the mean difference (MD) and the 95 % limits of agreement were determined as the coefficient of repeatability (COR). RESULTS: Mean logMAR VA values were HCD = 0.09, LCD = 0.44, HCN = 0.21, and LCN = 0.57. Mean differences in measurements between sessions 1 and 2 were not significant, and low in clinical terms (≤1 letter). Repeatability was better for the distance measurements at both high and lowcontrast (COR HCD ±0.11 and COR LCD ±0.11 logMAR vs COR HCN ±0.15 and COR LCN ±0.16 logMAR), and MDs were also slightly closer to zero for the distance measurements. Similar repeatability was observed between HC and LC VA, both at distance and near. CONCLUSIONS: In mesopic conditions, ETDRS charts offer repeatable best-corrected monocular VA measurements. The criterion for a significant change in logMAR VA was 1 line at distance and 1.5 lines at near.

Relationship between halo size and forward light scatter.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between the size of a halo induced by a glare source and forward scatter or visual acuity (VA) in healthy eyes. METHOD: Measurements were made in the right eyes of 51 healthy individuals of mean age 29.3 ± 7.5 years. Halo radius was measured using the Vision Monitor and low luminance (1 cd/m(2)) optotypes presented at a distance of 2.5 m. The visual angle subtended by the radius of the halo was calculated in minutes of arc (arc min). Forward scatter or, straylight, was measured using the compensation comparison technique. Best-corrected distance VA was measured using high contrast (HC) (96%) and low contrast (LC) (10%) Bailey-Lovie logMAR letter charts under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (0.15 cd/m(2)) luminance conditions. RESULTS: Mean halo radius was 202 ± 43 arc min (3.4 ± 0.7°) and mean retinal straylight was 0.95 ± 0.12 log units. Mean photopic distance HC-VA and LC-VA were -0.02 ± 0.06 and 0.12 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively. Mean mesopic distance HC-VA and LC-VA were 0.35 ± 0.11 and 0.74 ± 0.11 logMAR, respectively. Forward stepwise regression analysis revealed that halo radius was significantly correlated with straylight (r=0.45) and mesopic LC-VA (r=0.48), but not with photopic HC-VA and/or LC-VA and mesopic HC-VA. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy eyes, the larger the halo size induced by a given glare source, the greater the forward-scatter (straylight) and worse the mesopic LC-VA. Halo size seems to be independent of photopic HC-VA or LC-VA and mesopic HC-VA.

Normal values for the size of a halo produced by a glare source.

PURPOSE: To determine the size of a halo in the visual field induced by bright light in healthy eyes of all ages using the Vision Monitor (MonCv3; Metrovision, Pérenchies, France) and to assess the repeatability of the method. METHODS: Measurements were made in the right eyes of 147 healthy subjects (mean age: 48.2 ± 16.2 years) who were classified into six age groups. Using the Vision Monitor, optotypes of low luminance were presented at a distance of 2.5 m. The visual angle subtended by the radius of the halo was calculated in minutes of arc (arc min). The repeatability of the method was determined in a subset of 37 subjects older than 50 years by calculating the Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: The mean radius of the halo was 111.6 ± 39.8 arc min. Halo radius started to increase significantly from the age of 50 to 59 years. The relationship between halo radius and age (r = 0.65; P < .0001) was described by fitting a power function to the data. Halo size was independent of gender. The coefficient of repeatability of the method was ±44 arc min. CONCLUSIONS: Halo size increases with age following a power model. The normal halo size values provided could help clinicians distinguish between normal or abnormal glare problems. The intersession repeatability observed for halo size measurement indicates this method could be useful for assessing visual impairment caused by glare.

Relationship between macular pigment and visual acuity in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: Today the extent to which MP impacts visual function in early AMD remains unclear. This study examines the relationship between macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and high-contrast visual acuity (HC-VA) and low-contrast visual acuity (LC-VA) in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Measurements were made in 22 subjects with early AMD and 27 healthy control subjects. Distance best-corrected VA was measured using HC (96%) and LC (10%) Bailey-Lovie logMAR letter charts under photopic luminance conditions. MPOD was determined at the fovea through apparent motion photometry using the cathode ray tube-based Metropsis psychophysical vision test (Cambridge Research Systems). RESULTS: No significant differences in foveal MPOD were detected between the control eyes (0.30 ± 0.24 log units) and eyes with early AMD (0.27 ± 0.15 log units). Neither were differences detected between the two groups in mean HC- and LC-VA. Foveal MPOD showed significant correlation with both photopic HC-VA (r = -0.47, p = 0.0008) and LC-VA (r = -0.46, p = 0.0008) such that as MPOD increased, photopic HC-VA and LC-VA improved (lower logMAR values). CONCLUSIONS: Low MP levels were related to worse visual function in both healthy eyes and eyes with early AMD. Our findings provide direction for future studies designed to improve retinal function through the use of oral supplements known to increase MP levels, especially in eyes with AMD and a low MPOD.

Effects of wearing yellow spectacles on visual skills, reading speed, and visual symptoms in children with reading difficulties.

BACKGROUND: Possible beneficial effects of yellow-tinted spectacle lenses on binocular vision, accommodation, oculomotor scanning, reading speed and visual symptoms were assessed in children with reading difficulties. METHODS: A longitudinal prospective study was performed in 82 non-dyslexic children with reading difficulties in grades 3-6 (aged 9-11 years) from 11 elementary schools in Madrid (Spain). The children were randomly assigned to two groups: a treatment (n = 46) and a without-treatment group (n = 36). Children in the treatment group wore yellow spectacle lenses with best correction if necessary over 3 months (in school and at home). The tests were first undertaken without the yellow filter. With best spectacle correction in each subject, measurements were made of: distance and near horizontal heterophoria, distance and near horizontal fusional vergence ranges, the accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, near point of convergence (NPC), stereoacuity, negative relative accommodation (NRA) and positive relative accommodation (PRA), monocular accommodative amplitude (MAA), binocular accommodative facility (BAF), oculomotor scanning, and reading speed (words per minute). The Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) questionnaire was completed by all children. After the 3-month period, measurements were repeated with the yellow lenses (treatment group) or without the yellow lenses (without-treatment group) but with refractive correction if needed. RESULTS: Over the 3 months, the two groups showed similar mean changes in the variables used to assess binocular vision, accommodation, oculomotor scanning, and reading speed. However, mean relative changes in convergence insufficiency symptoms differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: No effects of wearing yellow spectacles emerged on binocular vision, accommodation, oculomotor scanning, and reading speed in children with reading difficulties. The yellow filter had no effect even in children with low MAA and BAF. The reduction in visual symptoms observed in children with reading difficulties using the yellow filters was clinically insignificant.

Impaired mesopic visual acuity in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To determine photopic and mesopic distance high-contrast visual acuity (HC-VA) and low-contrast visual acuity (LC-VA) in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Measurements were made in 22 subjects with early AMD and 28 healthy control subjects. Inclusion criteria included a photopic HC-VA of 20/25 or better. Distance VA was measured using HC (96%) and LC (10%) Bailey-Lovie logMAR letter charts under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (0.1-0.2 cd/m(2)) luminance conditions. RESULTS: Mean mesopic distance HC-VA and LC-VA were significantly worse (0.1 logMAR and 0.28 logMAR, respectively) in the early AMD group than in the control group. Under mesopic conditions, the mean difference between LC-VA and HC-VA was significantly greater in the early AMD (0.45 logMAR) than the control group (0.27 logMAR). Mean differences between mesopic versus photopic HC-VA and mesopic versus photopic LC-VA were significantly greater in the early AMD than the control group (0.13 and 0.32 logMAR of difference between the means, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity were significantly greater for mesopic LC-VA than for mesopic HC-VA (Receiver Operating Characteristics, area under the curve [AUC], 0.94 ± 0.030 and 0.76 ± 0.067, respectively). AUC values for photopic HC-VA and LC-VA were below 0.70. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity testing under low luminance conditions emerged as an optimal quantitative measure of retinal function in early AMD.

Binocular function in school children with reading difficulties.

INTRODUCTION: Prior findings suggest that poor readers tend to have poor binocular vision skills, but data on the binocular abilities of children with poor reading skills are lacking. Our aim was to characterize distance and near horizontal heterophoria, distance and near horizontal fusional vergence ranges, accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, near point of convergence, and stereopsis in poor-reading school-age children without dyslexia selected from a non-clinical population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 87 poor readers and 32 control children (all 8-13 years of age) in grades three to six recruited from eleven elementary schools in Madrid, Spain. With best spectacle correction in each subject, distance and near horizontal heterophoria measurements were obtained using the von Graefe technique, distance and near horizontal fusional vergence ranges were obtained using Risley rotary prisms, the AC/A ratio was measured using the gradient method, near point of convergence (NPC) was evaluated by the standard push-up technique using a transilluminator, and stereoacuity was tested with the Randot stereotest. RESULTS: Mean distance base-in break and base-in recovery values were nearly 2 Delta lower (p < 0.01) in the poor readers than those recorded in the control group. However, mean distance base-out vergences (blur, break and recovery), mean distance and near horizontal heterophoria, mean near horizontal fusional vergence ranges, mean AC/A ratio, mean near point of convergence (NPC), and mean stereoacuity did not differ significantly between the poor readers and controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information on the binocular ability of children with poor reading skills but without dyslexia. Our findings suggest reduced distance base-in break and base-in recovery, such that distance fusional vergence ranges should always be assessed in children who complain of reading difficulties.

Relationship between oculomotor scanning determined by the DEM test and a contextual reading test in schoolchildren with reading difficulties.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between oculomotor scanning and reading in poor readers of primary school age is not well known. This study was designed to assess this relationship by determining mean Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test times and reading speeds in a Spanish non-clinical population of children with poor reading skills but without dyslexia. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 81 poor readers (8-11 years of age) in the third to fifth grades recruited from 11 elementary schools in Madrid, Spain. In each subject with best spectacle correction, oculomotor scanning was measured using the DEM test, and reading speed (words per minute) was assessed by a standardized Spanish contextual reading test. RESULTS: Mean horizontal DEM times were higher than normative values for children in the third, fourth and fifth grades, by 20 seconds, 12 seconds, and 3 seconds respectively. Mean reading speeds were 18 words per minute lower than the norm for the third and fourth grades respectively, and 30 words per minute lower than the norm for the fifth grade. Reading speeds were significantly related to horizontal DEM times (r = -0.53, p < 0.0001). Thus, children showing a longer, or worse, horizontal DEM time achieved lower reading speeds. CONCLUSIONS: Poor readers showed poor horizontal scanning as assessed by the DEM test that was related to a slow reading speed. This test should be used by optometric clinicians as a screening tool to help identify poor reading skills in school children at an early stage.

Accommodative function in school children with reading difficulties.

BACKGROUND: Prior findings suggest correlation between reading problems and accommodative function, but few studies have assessed accommodation in children with poor reading skills. Our aim was to characterize monocular accommodative amplitude, relative accommodation and binocular accommodative facility in a population of healthy, non-dyslexic primary school children with reading difficulties. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 87 poor readers and 32 control children (all between 8 and 13 years of age) in grades three to six recruited from 11 elementary schools in Madrid, Spain. In each subject with best spectacle correction, negative relative accommodation (NRA) and positive relative accommodation (PRA) were measured using a phoropter, monocular accommodative amplitude (MAA) was determined using the minus lenses method, and binocular accommodative facility (BAF) was measured using the Bernell Acuity Suppression Slide (VO/9) and a +/- 2.00 D accommodative demand for a period of 1 minute. RESULTS: Monocular accommodative amplitude was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the group of poor readers (right eye 9.1 D +/- 2.3, left eye 9.0 D +/- 2.3) than in the control group (right eye 10.5 D +/- 1.7, left eye 10.5 D +/- 1.7). Binocular accommodative facility values were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the poor readers (4.9 cpm +/- 3.1) than controls (6.3 cpm +/- 2.9). Negative and positive relative accommodation values were similar in both groups of children. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides data on the accommodative capacity of a population of children with reading difficulties. Our findings suggest a reduced monocular accommodative amplitude and binocular accommodative facility, such that this function should be assessed by an optometric clinician in children whose reading level is below average.

Contrast sensitivity and disability glare in patients with dry eye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast sensitivity and disability glare in patients with dry eye using the Contrast Glaretester 1000. METHODS: Contrast sensitivity and disability glare were determined in 33 eyes of 33 patients with dry eye and 30 eyes of 30 healthy control subjects for six target sizes with a visual angle of 6.3-0.7 degrees using the Contrast Glaretester 1000, whose working mechanism is similar to that of the conventional perimetry instrument. RESULTS: Contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in dry eye group when viewing all target sizes (reduction of 0.10-0.25 log contrast units, p < 0.01) except at 6.3 degrees. In the presence of glare, differences in log contrast sensitivity between the groups (0.10-0.25 units) were significant (p < 0.01) for all target sizes, with the dry eye group showing worse results. The reduction in contrast sensitivity induced by glare (disability glare) was significantly worse in the dry eye group versus the control group but only for the 2.5-degree size target, where 0.14 log contrast units were lost. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast sensitivity with and without glare was significantly reduced in patients with dry eye compared with control subjects, but the number of log contrast units lost with glare (disability glare) was similar in the two groups, except for the 2.5-degree size target.

Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age.

BACKGROUND: Although it is well known that age affects visual function, we still have much to learn about the impact of aging on binocular vision. Our aim was to establish distance heterophoria and distance fusional vergence ranges in a large non-clinical population of wide age range, to provide normal values for comparisons. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 271 non-clinical subjects stratified into six age groups. Distance heterophoria measurements were obtained using the von Graefe technique and distance horizontal fusional vergence ranges using Risley rotary prisms in each subject, with best spectacle correction. RESULTS: The mean heterophoria value for distance fixation was exophoric except for the 71-80 year age group, which was esophoric. No effects of age were observed on distance heterophoria and distance base-in and base-out break means. However, a significant effect of age was noted on base-in recovery and base-out recovery. Between the youngest and oldest age groups, mean base-in recovery decreased by 2.5 Delta and mean base-out recovery by 3.3 Delta. CONCLUSIONS: Distance base-in and base-out recovery means diminished significantly with age such that recovery values fell outside the norm in subjects in the 61-70 year age group and older. This study establishes statistical normal values for distance heterophoria and fusional vergence in a non-clinical population. Mean values such as these are valuable tools for identifying subjects with far binocular anomalies.

Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate mesopic contrast sensitivity in conditions of glare and no glare in a vehicle driver population, and to explore the effects of age, habitual spectacle correction, photopic visual acuity and driving exposure. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 297 drivers stratified by age into six groups. The mesopic contrast sensitivity was measured in the absence or presence of glare using the Mesotest II (Oculus, Germany) in each subject both with habitual and best spectacle correction. A questionnaire on the subject's driving habits was completed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between contrast sensitivity measured with habitual or best spectacle correction. In conditions of no glare, the mesopic contrast sensitivity gradually got worse from 51 to 60 years onwards, and from 41 to 50 years onwards in the presence of glare. In both conditions, the total decrease in contrast sensitivity was 0.3 log units. The with-glare and without-glare mesopic contrast sensitivity improved as photopic visual acuity increased. Forty-five per cent of drivers who reported difficulties in driving at night were unable to perform any of the tests with glare, compared to 20% without glare. However, the effect of driving habits on contrast sensitivity was only significant in the oldest age group. CONCLUSIONS: The mesopic contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity seem to be stable until the age of 50 years, from which point they start to decline at a rate of 0.1 log contrast sensitivity loss per decade. Drivers with poor visual acuity and/or older drivers who avoided night driving presented worse mesopic contrast sensitivity and greater glare sensitivity.