Long-Term Safety and Outcomes of ß-radiation for Trabeculectomy.

PRCIS: ß-radiation is a neglected antiscarring therapy with past concerns for safety. This report found it safe and efficacious when used as an adjuvant to trabeculectomy surgery in 101 people (135 eyes) over 20 years. PURPOSE: ß-radiation has been used as an adjunct to prevent scarring in trabeculectomy surgery for many decades. Safety concerns were raised with the use of high doses on the bare sclera. Moorfields Eye Hospital has a large cohort of patients who have received ß-radiation therapy. We report a review of the long-term safety and efficacy. METHODS: Cases undertaken between August 1992 and August 1996 were reviewed. Those with records available for postoperative review of more than 5 years were included. Failure (reintervention/>21 mm Hg on 2 successive occasions) and any complication previously reported in association with ß-radiation were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 292 operations using ß-radiation were recorded and 101 people (135 eyes) with trabeculectomy surgery and postoperative follow-up for over 4.5 years were included. The median follow-up period was 22.5 years. At the final follow-up, 48 (48%) single eyes per person had failed and 20/51 (51%) eyes with primary open angle glaucoma had cataract surgery. Other complications were rare and associated with copathology. CONCLUSION: In glaucoma patients at risk of scarring and failure after trabeculectomy, as an antiscarring adjuvant, a 750 cGY dose of ß-radiation was found to be safe and efficacious in the long term.

Virtual clinics in glaucoma care: face-to-face versus remote decision-making.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To examine the agreement in clinical decisions of glaucoma status made in a virtual glaucoma clinic with those made during a face-to-face consultation. METHODS: A trained nurse and technicians entered data prospectively for 204 patients into a proforma. A subsequent face-to-face clinical assessment was completed by either a glaucoma consultant or fellow. Proformas were reviewed remotely by one of two additional glaucoma consultants, and 12 months later, by the clinicians who had undertaken the original clinical examination. The interobserver and intraobserver decision-making agreements of virtual assessment versus standard care were calculated. RESULTS: We identified adverse disagreement between face-to-face and virtual review in 7/204 (3.4%, 95% CI 0.9% to 5.9%) patients, where virtual review failed to predict a need to accelerated follow-up identified in face-to-face review. Misclassification events were rare, occurring in 1.9% (95% CI 0.3% to 3.8%) of assessments. Interobserver κ (95% CI) showed only fair agreement (0.24 (0.04 to 0.43)); this improved to moderate agreement when only consultant decisions were compared against each other (κ=0.41 (0.16 to 0.65)). The intraobserver agreement κ (95% CI) for the consultant was 0.274 (0.073 to 0.476), and that for the fellow was 0.264 (0.031 to 0.497). CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of adverse misclassification, combined with the slowly progressive nature of most glaucoma, and the fact that patients will all be regularly reassessed, suggests that virtual clinics offer a safe, logistically viable option for selected patients with glaucoma.

Comparison of handheld rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with glaucoma: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To test agreement of two methods to measure intraocular pressure (IOP): rebound tonometry (RBT) and gold standard Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in children with glaucoma. DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric glaucoma clinic at a single centre. PARTICIPANTS: 102 individuals attending a paediatric glaucoma clinic, mean (SD) age 11.85 (3.17), of whom 53 were male. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, child preference for measurement method. RESULTS: Limits of agreement for intraobserver and interobserver were, respectively, (-2.71, 2.98) mm Hg and (-5.75, 5.97) mm Hg. RBT frequently gave higher readings than GAT and the magnitude of disagreement depend on the level of IOP being assessed. Differences of 10 mm Hg were not uncommon. RBT was the preferred method for 70% of children. CONCLUSIONS: There is poor agreement between RBT and GAT in children with glaucoma. RBT frequently and significantly overestimates IOP. However, 'normal' RBT readings are likely to be accurate and may spare children an examination under anaesthesia (EUA). High RBT readings should prompt the practitioner to use another standard method of IOP measurement if possible, or consider the RBT measurement in the context of clinical findings before referring the child to a specialist clinic or considering EUA.