Evidence-based recommendations for examination and diagnostic strategies of polyneuropathy electrodiagnosis.

The purpose of this report is to recommend evidence-based strategies for polyneuropathy (PNP) electrodiagnosis based on a large cohort of patients examined prospectively. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) of bilateral tibial, peroneal and sural nerves, the latter with both near-nerve-technique (NNT) and surface recordings, were done in 313 patients with clinically suspected PNP. Bilateral dorsal sural and medial plantar nerves, and unilateral median and ulnar nerves were further examined in a subgroup of patients. The final clinical diagnosis retrieved from the patients medical records 1-6 years after the neurophysiological investigation served as diagnostic reference standard. The clinical follow-up diagnosis confirmed PNP in 219 patients. The tibial nerve was the most sensitive nerve (75%), with prolonged tibial F-wave as the most sensitive parameter (72%). Sural NNT recordings were more sensitive (66%) than surface recordings (49%) (p < 0.05), however, dorsal sural (68%) and medial planter (70%) nerves had similar sensitivities as NNT. There was no side difference in the incidence of abnormality for any nerve. Based on these results, we recommend a strategy starting with tibial and sural NCS on one side for electrophysiological screening for distal symmetric PNP. If one of these is abnormal, we recommend examining the other lower and upper extremity nerves, including distal sensory nerves, particularly if NNT is not applicable. While one abnormal parameter is sufficient to interpret a nerve as abnormal, we recommend at least two abnormal nerves for PNP diagnosis, preferentially one being the sural nerve. We believe that the strategies recommended in this study may improve PNP electrodiagnosis.

Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multicentre study of inter-rater variation and sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses inter-rater agreement and sensitivity of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Clinical and electrophysiological data of 399 patients with suspected ALS were collected by eleven experienced physicians from ten different countries. Eight physicians classified patients independently and blinded according to the revised El Escorial Criteria (rEEC) and to the Awaji Criteria (AC). Inter-rater agreement was assessed by Kappa coefficients, sensitivity by majority diagnosis on 350 patients with follow-up data. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement was generally low both for rEEC and AC. Agreement was best on the categories "Not-ALS", "Definite", and "Probable", and poorest for "Possible" and "Probable Laboratory-supported". Sensitivity was equal for rEEC (64%) and AC (63%), probably due to downgrading of "Probable Laboratory-supported" patients by AC. However, AC was significantly more effective in classifying patients as "ALS" versus "Not-ALS" (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater variation is high both for rEEC and for AC probably due to a high complexity of the rEEC inherent in the AC. The gain of AC on diagnostic sensitivity is reduced by the omission of the "Probable Laboratory-supported" category. SIGNIFICANCE: The results highlight a need for initiatives to develop simpler and more reproducible diagnostic criteria for ALS in clinical practice and research.

Neurophysiological localisation of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: Validation of diagnostic criteria developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of clinical neurophysiology.

OBJECTIVE: This study validates consensus criteria for localisation of ulnar neuropathy at elbow (UNE) developed by a taskforce of the Danish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology and compares them to the existing criteria from the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM). The Danish criteria are based on combinations of conduction slowing in the segments of the elbow and forearm expressed in Z-scores, and difference between the segments in m/s. Examining fibres to several muscles and sensory fibres can increase the certainty of the localisation. METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy for UNE was evaluated on 181 neurophysiological studies of the ulnar nerve from 171 peer-reviewed patients from a mixed patient-group. The diagnostic reference standard was the consensus diagnosis based on all available clinical, laboratory, and electrodiagnostic information reached by a group of experienced Danish neurophysiologists. RESULTS: The Danish criteria had high specificity (98.4%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (95.2%) and fair sensitivity (76.9%). Compared to the AANEM criteria, the Danish criteria had higher specificity (p<0.001) and lower sensitivity (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The Danish consensus criteria for UNE are very specific and have high PPV. SIGNIFICANCE: The Danish criteria for UNE are reliable and well suited for use in different centres as they are based on Z-scores.

Added value of electromyography in the diagnosis of myopathy: A consensus exercise.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, neurologists may primarily rely on blood biomarkers, muscle biopsy, MRI, and genetics in the diagnostic work-up of suspected myopathy. Using expert consensus as diagnostic reference standard, this study addressed the added value of electrodiagnostic medicine (EDX) in diagnosis of myopathies. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four EDX evaluations of patients with a peer-review consensus diagnosis of myopathy were collected by seven European centres. Each patient was given three different consensus diagnoses: (1) the EDX diagnosis solely based on EDX results, (2) the pure clinical diagnosis based on all available information except EDX results, and (3) the final diagnosis including EDX and all additional information. The myopathies were grouped as muscular dystrophy (45), inflammatory myopathy (46), other aetiology (36) or unknown aetiology (67). RESULTS: Higher diagnostic probabilities for myopathy were seen in the final diagnosis compared to the pure clinical diagnosis (p<0.001). Adding EDX information increased the diagnostic probability of myopathy in 67 patients (34.4%). The greatest increase was seen for myopathies of unknown aetiology. CONCLUSIONS: EDX has a major impact in the diagnosis of myopathies of unknown aetiology. In genetically or biopsy proven myopathies, EDX generally supports the diagnosis. SIGNIFICANCE: EDX is still a useful tool in the diagnostic work-up of most patients with suspected myopathy.

Pelvic floor electrophysiology in spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate sacral peripheral nerve function and continuity of pudendal nerve in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) using pelvic floor electrophysiological tests. METHODS: Twelve patients with low cervical or thoracic SCI were prospectively included. Quantitative external anal sphincter (EAS) muscle electromyography (EMG), pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) testing, bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) testing and pudendal short-latency somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) measurement were performed. RESULTS: In EAS muscle EMG, two patients had abnormal increased spontaneous activity and seven prolonged motor unit potential duration. PNTML was normal in 10 patients. BCR was present with normal latency in 11 patients and with prolonged latency in one. The second component of BCR could be recorded in four patients. SEPs showed absent cortical responses in 11 patients and normal latency in one. CONCLUSIONS: Pudendal nerve and sacral lower motor neuron involvement are significantly associated with chronic SCI, most prominently in EAS muscle EMG. The frequent finding of normal PNTML latencies supports earlier concerns on the utility of this test; however, BCR and pudendal SEPs may have clinical relevance. SIGNIFICANCE: As intact peripheral nerves including pudendal nerve are essential for efficient supportive therapies, pelvic floor electrophysiological testing prior to these interventions is highly recommended.

Generalised sensory system abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a European multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is defined as a disease of the motor neurones, although several studies indicate involvement of the sensory nervous system. AIM: To evaluate the sensory nerve conduction studies (NCS) in 88 patients with ALS as part of a European multicentre study. METHODS: Seven European clinical neurophysiologists examined consecutive series of ALS patients. The examinations were peer reviewed, and the diagnosis of ALS was confirmed clinically. RESULTS: 20 (22.7%) patients with ALS had sensory NCS abnormalities in at least one nerve. Of those, 11 (12.5% of all patients) obtained an additional peer review diagnosis of electrophysiological polyneuropathy. There was no difference between the subgroups of patients with normal versus abnormal sensory NCS findings with respect to age, duration and region of onset. CONCLUSION: The findings support previous reports of sensory involvement in ALS, and raise the question of whether patients with ALS with sensory nerve abnormalities represent a variant of ALS. ALS associated with generalised sensory system abnormalities may be consistent with degeneration of motor neurones and dorsal root ganglion cells.