ABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used in the management of paediatric cancer with a generally favourable benefit/risk profile. We report an unusual adverse drug reaction with the first course of high-dose MTX in a paediatric patient and review the literature for similar cases. CASE SUMMARY: An 11-year-old boy with small-cell osteoblastic osteosarcoma in the lower limb experienced a case of life-threatening anaphylaxis during the first course of high-dose MTX. The adverse event occurred during the first course, likely due to an immune-mediated mechanism. We postulate that prior antineoplastic treatment might have contributed to the immune response to MTX. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Given that this reaction has rarely been reported, we discuss the present case with a review of other similar cases. Further studies are needed to substantiate this 'signal alarm' for serious MTX-related hypersensitivity reactions.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/chemically induced , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Child , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/administration & dosage , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Osteosarcoma/drug therapy , Osteosarcoma/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the type, frequency, severity and predictors of potential Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) in a cohort of patients undergoing radiodiagnostic procedures. SETTING: Eight Radiology wards located in Tuscany (Italy). METHODS: All participants exposed to at least two medications were included in the analysis. DDIs were grouped according to their severity as 'minor', 'moderate' or 'major'. A logistic model was used to estimate Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for all predictors of potential DDI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type and predictors of potential DDI in a cohort of patients undergoing radiodiagnostic procedures. RESULTS: One-thousand-and-two subjects (57.6% females; mean age: 67.3 +/- 12.2) entered the analysis, and 46.1% of them incurred in a potential DDI (78.9% 'moderate' in severity). The combination of allopurinol and ACE-inhibitors was the most frequent (21/153) among major potential DDIs, while steroids were involved in all cases of potential DDI due to premedication. Co-morbidity, number of co-medications, advanced age and premedication use increased the risk of potential DDI; a protective role was found for positive history of allergy. When the analysis was restricted to subjects with premedication (n = 93), only 12.9% of them reported a potential DDI directly attributable to premedication drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing radiological examination, types and predictors of potential DDIs appeared in agreement with other kind of in-hospital populations. Premedication revealed to be a proxy predictor for potential DDIs. Considering the poor capability of the prescriber in recognizing interactions, their systematic evaluation (using an informatics tool) in patients undergoing radiological examination might be helpful in preventing the occurrence of clinically relevant DDIs.
