Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up of Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Steroid-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Condyles.

OBJECTIVE: No studies currently exist with long-term follow-up of use of osteochondral allografting (OCA) for treatment of steroid-associated osteonecrosis of femoral condyles in young, active patients who wish to avoid total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluate the extent to which fresh osteochondral allografts can (1) prevent or postpone need for prosthetic arthroplasty and (2) maintain long-term clinically meaningful decrease in pain and improvement in function at mean 11-year follow-up. DESIGN: Twenty-five patients (33 knees) who underwent OCA transplantation for osteonecrosis of the knee between 1984 and 2013 were evaluated, including 22 females and 11 males with average age of 25 years (range, 16-48 years). Mean total allograft surface area was 10.6 cm2 (range, 4.0-19.0 cm2). Evaluation included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Knee Society function (KS-F) score, and modified (for the knee) Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) score. RESULTS: OCA survivorship was 90% at 5 years and 82% at 10 years. Twenty-eight of 33 knees (85%) avoided arthroplasty and 25 of 33 knees (73%) avoided other surgical intervention. Mean IKDC pain score improved (P = 0.001) from 7.2 preoperatively to 2.8 at latest follow-up, mean IKDC function score increased (P = 0.005) from 3.3 to 6.5, and mean IKDC total score improved (P = 0.001) from 31.9 to 61.1. Mean KS-F score improved (P = 0.003) from 61.7 to 87.5. Mean modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) score improved (P < 0.001) from 11.4 to 15.1. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that OCA transplantation is a reasonable surgical treatment option for steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral condyles, with durable long-term outcomes.

Self-Reported Metal Allergy and Early Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The impact of self-reported metal allergy (SRMA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. In the absence of objective tests, SRMA is often used as a screening tool for implant selection. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of SRMA on early outcomes after TKA. Between 2010 and 2014, 168 patients with SRMA underwent TKA; 150 (89%) received nickel-free implants, and 18 (11%) received cobalt-chrome implants that contained nickel. Mean age was 67 years, and 95% were female. A cohort of 858 TKA patients (mean age, 68 years) without SRMA matched by sex served as the control group. Outcomes included Knee Society Score (function [KSS-F] and knee [KSS-K]), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, knee flexion, further surgery, and complications. No differences were seen in KSS-F and KSS-K between patients with and without SRMA. The mean WOMAC pain scores were 89.1 for patients with SRMA and 85.2 for patients without SRMA (P=.030). Stiffness and physical function scores were similar. Knee flexion was similar. No differences were found between nickel-free and cobalt-chrome SRMA groups. Patients with SRMA and those without demonstrated similar early functional outcomes. Patients with SRMA who received standard cobalt-chrome implants had no significant difference in functional outcomes compared with patients with nickel-free implants. Better identifiers of patients at risk for adverse events due to implant material are needed. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6):330-334.].

Fusion Rates of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational case series. OBJECTIVES: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has been widely performed with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), but the fusion rates using this graft alternative have not been well studied. We aimed to evaluate fusion rates in 1- and 2-level LLIF with rhBMP-2 and their relationship with fixation, as well as rates of BMP-related complications. METHODS: Institutional review board (IRB)-approved spine registry cohort of 93 patients who underwent LLIF with rhBMP-2 (71 one-level cases and 22 two-level cases). Minimum 1-year clinical follow-up and computed tomography (CT) scan for fusion assessment. Postoperative CT scans were used to evaluate the rate of fusion in all patients. Instrumentation and complications were collected from chart and imaging review. RESULTS: Average age was 65 years (67% female). For 1-level cases, 92% (65/71) had complete fusion and 8% (6/71) had either incomplete or indeterminate fusion. Three of the 6 patients who had incomplete or indeterminate fusion had bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation, 1 patient had unilateral posterior fixation, and 2 had no fixation. In 2-level cases, 86% (19/22) had complete fusion and 14% (3/22) had either incomplete or indeterminate fusion. The 3 patients who had incomplete or indeterminate fusion did not have fixation. CONCLUSION: Interbody fusion rates with rhBMP-2 via LLIF was 92% in 1-level cases and 86% in 2-level cases, indicating that rhBMP-2 may be used as a viable graft alternative to allograft options for LLIF. Higher rates of pseudarthrosis occurred when not using fixation.

Bipolar Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Tibiotalar Joint: A Concise Mid-Term Follow-up of a Previous Report☠.

Despite advances in managing degenerative arthritis of the ankle joint, there are few optimal treatment options for young patients with symptomatic, end-stage degenerative disease. Popular surgical options consist of traditional arthrodesis and, more recently, arthroplasty. Additional techniques, including arthroscopic debridement and joint distraction, have gained little traction. An alternative option is bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation of the tibiotalar joint. We previously reported on a cohort of 86 ankles that had undergone bipolar OCA of the tibiotalar joint and now present the results after longer, mid-term follow-up (mean, 9.2 years) of the same cohort. OCA survivorship was 74.8% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. Of the patients with a surviving graft, 74% were satisfied with the results. At the latest follow-up, 86% reported better function and 79% reported less pain compared with preoperatively. Bipolar OCA transplantation of the tibiotalar joint is an effective alternative treatment for selected young patients with end-stage ankle arthritis who wish to avoid arthrodesis or prosthetic arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Condyle Utilizing a Thin Plug Graft Technique.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed clinical benefit and durable results of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for the treatment of femoral condyle lesions. However, the majority of these studies are difficult to interpret owing to the mixed results of different techniques and anatomic locations. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of OCA transplantation with thin plug grafts for treatment of isolated femoral condyle osteochondral lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study included 187 patients (200 knees) who underwent OCA transplantation for isolated osteochondral lesions on the femoral condyle between 1999 and 2014. For all cases, a thin plug technique was used with commercially available surgical instruments and the minimum amount of bone necessary for fixation. Evaluation included International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and patient satisfaction. Frequency and type of further surgery were assessed. Failure of the allograft was defined as further surgery involving removal of the allograft. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 1.9-16.5 years). The mean age of patients at the time of surgery was 31 years, and 63% were male. The medial femoral condyle was affected in 69% of knees. A single thin plug graft was used in 145 knees (72.5%), and 2 grafts were used in 55 knees (27.5%). Mean allograft area was 6.3 cm2, and graft thickness was 6.5 mm (cartilage and bone combined). Further surgery was required for 52 knees (26%), of which 16 (8% of entire cohort) were defined as allograft failures (4 OCA revisions, 1 arthrosurface, 6 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 5 total knee arthroplasties). Median time to failure was 4.9 years. Survivorship of the allograft was 95.6% at 5 years and 91.2% at 10 years. Among patients with grafts remaining in situ at latest follow-up, clinically meaningful improvement in pain, function, and quality of life was reported. Satisfaction was reported by 89% of patients. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation with a thin plug graft technique is a valuable procedure for the treatment of femoral condyle osteochondral lesions, resulting in significant improvement in clinical scores, high patient satisfaction, and low reoperation and clinical failure rates.

Is Patient Satisfaction Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee?

BACKGROUND: The association between patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes after cartilage repair is not well understood. PURPOSE: To investigate the association of patient satisfaction with pain, function, activity level, and quality of life after fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation in the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study comprised 371 patients (396 knees) who underwent primary OCA transplantation for osteochondral lesions in the knee between 1997 and 2015. Mean ± SD patient age was 31.8 ± 11.6 years, and 62% were male. The majority of grafts (62%) were located on the femoral condyle; the mean number of grafts per knee was 1.5 ± 0.8; and the median graft area was 6.9 cm2 (range, 1.8-50 cm2). Pain, function, activity level, and quality of life were evaluated pre- and postoperatively via International Knee Documentation Committee scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores. Patient satisfaction with the results of the OCA transplantation was assessed postoperatively. All follow-up evaluations occurring at postoperative 1 year or later were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 5.5 years. Overall, the satisfaction rate was 88.1%, and this rate was constant over time. Satisfaction rates varied by diagnosis, age, sex, and anatomic location of the allograft. Postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee pain, function, and total scores differed between patients who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). All Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale results differed between those who were satisfied and not satisfied (all P < .001). Having a diagnosis of osteochondritis dissecans was the only variable that predicted which patients would be satisfied with the results of the allograft, after controlling for age, sex, anatomic location of the graft, and number of grafts. CONCLUSION: A consistently high and durable patient satisfaction rate after OCA transplantation was found. Satisfied patients reported lower pain and higher function, activity levels, and quality of life as compared with patients who were not satisfied. Patients with osteochondritis dissecans had a particularly high level of satisfaction with the OCA procedure.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Midterm Follow-up.

BACKGROUND:: Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation represents a biologic restoration technique as an alternative treatment option for larger osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm outcomes after OCA transplantation for the treatment of OLT. METHODS:: Nineteen patients (20 ankles) received partial unipolar OCA transplant for symptomatic OLT between January 1998 and October 2014. The mean age was 34.7 years, and 53% were male. The average graft size was 3.8 cm2. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Outcomes included the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and pain and satisfaction questionnaires. Failure of OCA was defined as conversion to arthrodesis or revision OCA transplantation. RESULTS:: Five of 20 ankles (25%) required further surgery, of which 3 (5%) were considered OCA failures (2 arthrodesis and 1 OCA revision). The mean time to failure was 3.5 (range, 0.9 to 6.7) years. Survivorship was 88.7% at 5 years and 81.3% at 10 years. The median follow-up of the 17 patients with grafts in situ was 9.7 years. The mean OMAS improved significantly from 40 points preoperatively to 71 points postoperatively ( P < .05; range, 5 to 55). The mean postoperative AAOS-FAM core score was 81.5 ± 15 (range, 40.5 to 96.6). Fifteen of 17 patients responded to follow-up questions regarding their ankle; 14 patients reported less pain and better function, and 13 patients were satisfied with the results of the procedure. CONCLUSION:: Our study of midterm results after OCA transplantations showed that this procedure was a reasonable treatment option for large OLT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Level IV, case series.

Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Affect the Outcome of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation? A Matched Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-up of 6 Years.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the influence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on the outcome of cartilage repair. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to investigate the association between ACL reconstruction and functional outcomes after osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. The hypothesis was that patients treated with OCA transplantation who had a history of ACL reconstruction would have inferior clinical outcomes and lower osteochondral graft survivorship when compared with a matched group of patients undergoing OCA transplantation without a history of ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This study compared 31 knees that underwent OCA transplantation with a history of ACL reconstruction (OCA and ACL group) and 62 knees treated with isolated OCA transplantation (OCA group) that had an intact ACL. Groups were matched by age, diagnosis, year of surgery, and graft size. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Frequency and type of reoperation were assessed. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA transplantation or conversion to arthroplasty. Subjective outcome measures included International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Clinical failure occurred in 3 of 31 knees (9.7%) in the OCA and ACL group and 6 of 62 knees (9.7%) in the OCA group ( P ≤ .999). Five- and 10-year survivorship of the OCA was 94.7% and 82.3% for the OCA and ACL group and 93.4% and 79.6% for OCA group, respectively ( P = .979). Mean follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.3 years among all knees with grafts in situ. Changes from preoperative to latest follow-up visit (difference scores) on all subjective outcome measures were greater in the OCA group; however, none of the difference scores were statistically significant. Satisfaction with the results of OCA transplantation was reported in 78.3% of the OCA and ACL group and 71.7% of the OCA group ( P = .551). CONCLUSION: Treatment of cartilage lesions with OCA transplantation proved to be reliable and effective regardless of a history of ACL reconstruction as demonstrated by the improvements in outcome scores, long survivorship, and high satisfaction rates. History of ACL reconstruction did not influence outcome of OCA transplantation.

Lesion Size Does Not Predict Outcomes in Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cartilage repair algorithms use lesion size to choose surgical techniques when selecting a cartilage repair procedure. The association of fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) size with graft survivorship and subjective patient outcomes is still unknown. PURPOSE: To determine if lesion size (absolute or relative) affects outcomes after OCA transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included 156 knees in 143 patients who underwent OCA transplantation from 1998 to 2014 for isolated femoral condyle lesions. The mean age was 29.6 ± 11.4 years, and 62.9% were male. The majority of patients (62.2%) presented for cartilage repair because of osteochondritis dissecans. The mean graft area, used as a surrogate for absolute size of the lesion, was 6.4 cm2 (range, 2.3-11.5 cm2). The relative size of the lesion was calculated as the tibial width ratio (TWR; ratio of graft area to tibial width) and affected femoral condyle ratio (AFCR; ratio of graft area to affected femoral condyle width) using preoperative radiographs. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Further surgical procedures were documented, and graft failure was defined as revision OCA transplantation or conversion to arthroplasty. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores were obtained. Satisfaction with OCA transplantation was assessed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up among patients with grafts remaining in situ was 6.0 years (range, 1.9-16.5 years). The OCA failure rate was 5.8%. Overall survivorship of the graft was 97.2% at 5 years and 93.5% at 10 years. No difference in postoperative outcomes between groups was found in absolute or relative size. Change in IKDC scores (from preoperative to latest follow-up) was greater for knees with large lesions compared to knees with small lesions, among all measurement methods. Overall satisfaction with the results of OCA transplantation was 89.8%. CONCLUSION: The size of the lesion, either absolute or relative, does not influence outcomes after OCA transplantation for isolated femoral condyle lesions of the knee.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Opening Wedge Tibial Osteotomy: Clinical Results of a Combined Single Procedure.

Objective To evaluate the outcome of patients who have undergone simultaneous osteotomy and osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation. Our hypothesis is that use of high tibial osteotomy and fresh OCA in a combined procedure is safe and effective without increasing morbidity in comparison to OCA alone. Design A case series of 17 patients underwent tibial osteotomy and simultaneous OCA during a single surgery. Osteotomy was indicated when axial alignment was within the affected compartment. Patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up after surgery. The mean graft size was 8.7 cm2, with 82% located on the medial femoral condyle alone and 18% involving the medial femoral condyle and one or more other sites. Data collection included demographics, osteotomy correction, graft site(s) and area, and clinical evaluation. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty. Results Two of 17 patients (12%) failed at a mean of 9.3 years. The remaining 15 patients (88%) had intact allografts with mean survival of 8.1 years (SD 3.3). Five patients (29%) had an additional procedure, all undergoing osteotomy hardware removal. Of those with surviving allografts, mean pain and function scores improved significantly from the preoperative to postoperative assessment and International Knee Documentation Committee total scores improved significantly from 40.9 ± 15.4 preoperative to 75.5 ± 24.0 at latest follow-up ( P = 0.003); 92% of patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery. No postoperative complications occurred. Conclusion Combining high tibial osteotomy and OCA in properly selected patients is safe and effective.

Return to Sport and Recreational Activity After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an integral part of the cartilage repair paradigm, but insufficient data are available regarding return to sport or recreational activity after the procedure. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if athletic patients undergoing OCA transplantation returned to sport, assess reasons for not returning to sport, and ascertain patient and graft-related characteristics that differed between those who returned or did not return to sport. The secondary aims were to assess graft survivorship and patient-reported subjective outcome measures (pain, function, satisfaction) among athletic patients undergoing OCA transplantation. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We identified 149 knees in 142 patients who participated in sport or recreational activity before a cartilage injury (45% highly competitive athletes and 55% well-trained and frequently sporting) and underwent OCA transplantation in the knee. The mean age was 31.2 years and 58.4% were male. Information on preinjury and postoperative participation in sport or recreational activity was collected. Patients not returning to sport after OCA transplantation were mailed a questionnaire to assess why. Postoperative pain, function, and satisfaction scores were obtained, and further surgery on the operative knee was documented. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 6 years, 75.2% of knees returned to sport or recreational activity. Among those who did not return to sport, knee-related issues and lifestyle changes were cited as reasons why. Patients who did not return to sport were more likely to be female, have injured their knee in an activity other than sport, and have a larger graft size. The diagnosis and anatomic location also differed. Overall, 71% of knees reported having "very good" to "excellent" function, and 79% were able to participate in a high level of activity (moderate, strenuous, or very strenuous) postoperatively. After OCA transplantation, 25.5% of knees underwent further surgery; 14 knees (9.4% of entire cohort) were considered allograft failures. Among the 135 knees that had the graft remaining in situ, pain and function improved from preoperatively to the latest follow-up on all measures, and 91% of patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation is a successful treatment option for athletes and highly active patients who sustain a cartilage injury to their knee. The majority of patients returned to sport or recreational activity.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Fractures of the Knee.

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes and allograft survivorship among patients with knee fracture who underwent fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as a salvage treatment option. Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at one hospital. Patients Fresh OCAs were implanted for osteochondral lesions after knee fracture in 24 males and 15 females with an average age of 34 years. Twenty-nine lesions (74%) were tibial plateau fractures, 6 (15%) were femoral condyle fractures, and 4 (10%) were patella fractures. Main Outcome Measurements Clinical evaluation included modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point), International Knee Documentation Committee, and Knee Society function scores, and patient satisfaction. Failure of OCA was defined as revision OCA or conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results Nineteen of 39 knees (49%) had further surgery. Ten knees (26%) were considered OCA failures (3 OCA revisions, 6 TKA, and 1 patellectomy). Survivorship of the OCA was 82.6% at 5 years and 69.6% at 10 years. Among the 29 knees (74%) that had the OCA still in situ, median follow-up was 6.6 years. Pain and function improved from preoperative to latest follow-up; 83% of patients reported satisfaction with OCA results. Conclusion OCA transplantation is a useful salvage treatment option for osteochondral lesions caused by knee fracture. Although the reoperation rate was high, successful outcome was associated with significant clinical improvement.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in Patients With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee can be difficult to treat. Cartilage restoration techniques are often indicated when the lesion or fragment cannot be salvaged and the patient remains symptomatic. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation can restore both bone and cartilage defects characteristic of OCD. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that osteochondral allografting is a successful method for treating OCD of the knee. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: This study comprised 135 patients (149 knees) who underwent OCA for OCD of the knee (type III or IV) between 1997 and 2013 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The median age was 21 years (range, 12-55 years) and 75.8% of the patients were male. The mean allograft size was 7.3 cm2 (range, 2.2-25 cm2). Evaluation included the following: frequency and type of reoperations; modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel (18-point) scale; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores; and Knee Society function (KS-F) and knee (KS-K) scores. Clinical failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to arthroplasty. Graft survivorship was determined. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 6.3 years (range, 1.9-16.8 years) and 62% of participants had more than 5-year follow-up. Thirty-four of 149 knees (23%) had reoperations, of which 12 (8%) were classified as allograft failures (7 OCA revisions, 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties, and 2 total knee arthroplasties). OCA survivorship was 95% at 5 years and 93% at 10 years. Of the 137 knees whose grafts were still in situ at the latest follow-up, the mean modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel (18-point) score was 16.8; IKDC pain, function, and total scores were 2.1, 8.1, and 82.3; and KS-F and KS-K scores were 95.7 and 94.3, respectively. The majority of patients (95%) reported being satisfied with the outcome of their procedure. CONCLUSION: OCA transplantation was an effective treatment for OCD of the knee, with a low rate of graft failure, significant improvement in pain and function scores, and high patient satisfaction.

Use of an Anti-Gravity Treadmill for Early Postoperative Rehabilitation After Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Study to Determine Safety and Feasibility.

The objective was to determine the safety, feasibility, and effects of anti-gravity gait training on functional outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], the Timed Up and Go test [TUG], Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] for pain) with the AlterG® Anti-Gravity Treadmill® device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation. Subjects (N = 30) were randomized to land-based vs anti-gravity gait training over 4 weeks of physical therapy after TKA. Adverse events, complications, and therapist satisfaction were recorded. All patients completed rehabilitation protocols without adverse events. KOOS, TUG, and NRS scores improved in both groups with no significant differences between groups. For the AlterG group, Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales of the KOOS had the most improvement. At the end of physical therapy, TUG and NRS pain scores improved from 14 seconds to 8 seconds and from 2.8 to 1.1, respectively. Subjectively, therapists reported 100% satisfaction with the AlterG. This initial pilot study demonstrated that the AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill device was safe and feasible. While functional outcomes improved over time with use of the anti-gravity gait training, further studies are needed to define the role of this device as an alternative or adjunct to established rehabilitation protocols.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Femoral Trochlea.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a recognized treatment modality for cartilage damage in the knee. Few reports are available on outcomes of OCA in the patellofemoral joint, and there are no reports on lesions isolated to the femoral trochlea. PURPOSE: To evaluate graft survivorship and clinical outcomes in patients who had an OCA to the femoral trochlea. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: An OCA database was used to identify 29 knees in 28 patients (mean age, 30.2 years; range, 12-47 years; 8 female, 20 male) who were treated with a fresh OCA transplant limited to the femoral trochlea. The primary outcome was graft survivorship, and the minimum follow-up was 2 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) score; Knee Society function (KS-F) score; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) pain, function, and total scores; and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. The OCA patient satisfaction score (5-point scale from extremely satisfied to dissatisfied) was also reported. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 7.0 years (range, 2.1-19.9 years). Graft survivorship was 100% at 5 years and 91.7% at 10 years. One patient was converted to a total knee arthroplasty 7.6 years after OCA surgery. The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score improved from 13.0 to 16.1, the mean KS-F score from 65.6 to 85.2, and the mean IKDC total score from 38.5 to 71.9; the mean UCLA score was 7.9 postoperatively. Eighty-nine percent of patients were extremely satisfied or satisfied with the outcome of surgery. CONCLUSION: Fresh OCA transplantation resulted in excellent clinical outcomes in this patient cohort with articular cartilage damage to the femoral trochlea. The procedure resulted in improved pain and function and high patient satisfaction.

The Use of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Primary Treatment of Cartilage Lesions in the Knee.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as the primary treatment for cartilage injury in patients with no previous surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. Patients were identified in our outcomes database. Patients undergoing primary OCA transplantation with no prior surgical treatment and a minimum of 2 years follow-up were selected. Pain and function were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed. Reoperations following OCA transplantation were captured. Failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to arthroplasty. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (61 knees) were included in the analysis. The study consisted of 30 males and 25 females (mean age = 32.9 years; range = 15.7-67.8 years). The most common diagnoses for the OCA transplantation were osteochondritis dissecans (44.3%) and avascular necrosis (31.1%). Pain and function improved preoperatively to postoperatively on all outcome scales (P < 0.01). The majority of patients (86%) were "extremely satisfied" or "satisfied." OCA survivorship was 89.5% at 5 years and 74.7% at 10 years. At latest follow-up (mean = 7.6 years; range = 1.9-22.6 years), OCA remained in situ in 50 knees (82%). Eighteen knees (29.5%) had further surgery; 11 OCA failures and 7 other surgical procedure(s). Of the failed knees (mean time to failure = 3.5 years; range = 0.5-13.7 years), 8 were converted to arthroplasty, 2 had OCA revisions, and 1 had a patellectomy. CONCLUSIONS: OCA transplantation is an acceptable primary treatment method for some chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee. Failure of previous treatment(s) is not a prerequisite for OCA transplantation.

Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoids.

BACKGROUND: Primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with posterior wear of the glenoid and posterior subluxation of the humerus (Walch type B) presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. Our hypothesis was that glenoids with biconcavity (B2) would be associated with worse outcomes (functional scores and complications) than B1 glenoids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 112 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (104 patients) with B glenoids. Preoperative computed tomography identified 64 B1 glenoids and 48 B2 glenoids (50 and 37 available for follow-up). RESULTS: A significant difference between B1 and B2 glenoids was noted in average retroversion (11° vs. 16°; P < .001) and average posterior humeral subluxation (65% vs. 75%; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in mean age (69.5 vs. 69.2 years) or body mass index (28.5 vs. 27.4) at time of surgery. At average follow-up of 60 months (range, 23-120 months), glenoid component radiolucencies (51.6%, B1; 47.9%, B2), range of motion, preoperative and postoperative scores of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Four revisions (4.6%) were documented for acute postoperative infection (2.3%), subscapularis failure (1.1%), and glenoid loosening (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Although biconcave glenoids commonly have more severe retroversion and posterior subluxation of the humerus, we were unable to find a clinical or radiographic difference in outcome of patients with B1 or B2 glenoids treated with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty at intermediate-term follow-up. Continued clinical and radiographic follow-up of these cohorts will be necessary to assess any future divergence in outcome.

Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in the Knee: Interobserver Agreement and Clinical Application.

INTRODUCTION: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a suitable treatment option for large osteochondral defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an objective, reproducible, noninvasive monitoring tool for postoperative assessment after cartilage surgery. OBJECTIVE: To correlate Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in patients undergoing OCA transplantation in the knee with clinical outcomes and determine interobserver agreement of this scoring system. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent OCA transplantation in the knee and received a postoperative MRI. Four examiners read each MRI and completed an OCAMRISS. Interobserver agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated. Correlation between the OCAMRISS and clinical outcomes was calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement on individual features of the OCAMRISS was superior (κ = 0.81-1.0) in 65% of comparisons, substantial (κ = 0.61-0.8) in 14%, moderate (κ = 0.41-0.6) in 18%, and fair (κ = 0.21-0.4) in 3%. Agreement among readers was very strong for the cartilage, bone, ancillary, and total scores with 96% of comparisons having an ICC >0.80. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) function scores were correlated with OCAMRISS cartilage score (ρ = 0.53, P = 0.044) and total score (ρ = 0.67, P = 0.006). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sports/recreation subscale was correlated with OCAMRISS ancillary score (ρ = 0.58, P = 0.049) and total score (ρ = 0.64, P = 0.024). No correlation was observed with subchondral bone features of OCAMRISS and any of the outcome scores. CONCLUSIONS: The recently described OCAMRISS is a reproducible grading system for in vivo evaluation after osteochondral allograft transplantation.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Knee Lesions after Failure of Cartilage Repair Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation as a salvage procedure after various cartilage repair surgeries. DESIGN: One hundred sixty-four knees in 163 patients (mean age = 32.6 years; range = 11-59 years; 55% males) were treated with OCA transplantation after subchondral marrow stimulation (SMS), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). The majority of previous procedures were isolated SMS in 145 knees (88.4%). Mean allograft size was 8.5 ± 7.9 cm(2). The most common location was in femoral condyle. The number and type of reoperations on the operative knee were assessed. Failure of the OCA transplantation was defined as any reoperation resulting in removal of the allograft. Functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight knees had reoperations after OCA transplantation. Thirty-one knees (18.9%) were classified as allograft failures. The median time to failure was 2.6 ± 6.8 years (range = 0.7-23.4 years). Survivorship of the graft was 82% at 10 years and 74.9% at 15 years. Patients whose grafts were still in situ had a mean of 8.5 ± 5.6 years of follow-up. Scores on all functional outcomes scales improved significantly from preoperatively to latest follow-up. Eighty-nine percent of OCA transplantation patients reported being "extremely satisfied" or "satisfied." CONCLUSION: Despite the high reoperation rate, OCA transplantation is a successful salvage surgical treatment after cartilage repair procedures. This cohort showed improved survivorship and functional outcomes of OCA transplantation after SMS, ACI, and OAT.

Fresh osteochondral allografts in the knee: comparison of primary transplantation versus transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation.

BACKGROUND: In most treatment algorithms, osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is regarded as an alternative salvage procedure when other, previous reparative treatments have failed. PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of a retrospective matched-pair cohort of (1) primary OCA transplantation and (2) OCA transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: An OCA database was used to identify 46 knees that had OCA transplantation performed as a primary treatment (group 1) and 46 knees that underwent OCA transplantation after failure of previous subchondral marrow stimulation (group 2). All patients had a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Patients in each group were matched for age (±5 years), diagnosis (osteochondral lesion, degenerative chondral lesion, traumatic chondral injury), and graft size (small, <5 cm2; medium, 5-10 cm2; large, >10 cm2). The groups had similar body mass indexes, sex distributions, and graft locations (femoral condyle, patella, and trochlea. The number and type of further surgeries after the OCA transplantation were assessed; failure was defined as any reoperation resulting in removal of the graft. Functional outcomes were evaluated by use of the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), and the Knee Society function (KS-F) scale. Patient satisfaction, according to a 5-point scale from "extremely satisfied" to "dissatisfied," was recorded at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Eleven of 46 knees (24%) in group 1 had reoperations, compared with 20 of 46 knees (44%) in group 2 (P = .04). The OCA was classified as a failure in 5 knees (11%) in group 1 and 7 knees (15%) in group 2 (P = .53). At 10 years of follow-up, survivorship of the graft was 87.4% and 86% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Both groups showed improvement in pain and function on all subjective scores from preoperatively to the latest follow-up (all P < .001). Results showed that 87% of patients in group 1 and 97% in group 2 were "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied" with the OCA transplantation. CONCLUSION: Favorable results were shown in both groups with significant improvement of functional scores and excellent survivorship. Despite the higher reoperation rate in the previously treated group, previous subchondral marrow stimulation did not adversely affect the survivorship and functional outcome of OCA transplantation.