A simple and rapid pre-clinical in vivo model reveals comparative cardiotoxicity profiles of kinase inhibitors.

Despite significant success, targeted therapeutics such as kinase inhibitors (KIs) still pose adverse events such as the cardiotoxicity. There is a lot of variation in the type and intensity of cardiotoxicity caused by different KIs and current pre-clinical models are inadequate to predict it. Thus, there is a need to develop more simple and rapid models for screening of novel KIs at the pre-clinical step itself. We thus aimed to establish a rapid and robust pre-clinical animal model for predicting cardiotoxicity of KIs and identify comparative cardiotoxicity profiles of a panel of FDA-approved KIs. Heart rate measurement and survival analysis of Daphnia was performed at regular intervals following treatment with ten KIs that were approved for the treatment of various cancers. The heart rates of Daphnia as well as the survival varied between KIs in a dose and time dependent manner suggesting differential cardiotoxicity profiles of various KIs. Further, the correlation between the cardiotoxicity and survival also varied among the ten KIs. Importantly, sorafenib and vemurafenib displayed maximum and least cardiotoxicity, respectively. The comparative cardiotoxicity profiles also are in conformity with the previous studies indicating the utility of Daphnia as a valuable and relevant animal model to rapidly predict the cardiotoxicity of novel KIs at a pre-clinical stage.

A Real-World Study of Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Bevacizumab in Patients With Solid Malignancies: A Phase IV, Post-Marketing Study in India.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-marketing safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and efficacy of Bevacizumab (manufactured by Hetero Biopharma) in a broader population of patients with solid tumors. Patients And Methods: This phase IV, prospective, multi-centric clinical study was carried out in Indian patients with solid malignancies (metastatic colorectal cancer, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma) treated with Bevacizumab between April 2018 and July 2019. This study included 203 patients from 16 tertiary care oncology centers across India for safety assessment, of which a subset of 115 patients who have consented were also evaluated for efficacy and immunogenicity. This study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI), and was commenced only after receiving approval from the competent authority (Central Drugs Standard Control Organization, CDSCO). Results: Out of the 203 enrolled patients, 121 (59.6%) patients reported 338 adverse events (AEs) during this study. Of 338 reported AEs, 14 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported by 13 patients including 6 fatal SAEs, assessed as unrelated to the study medication and 7 non-fatal SAEs, 5 assessed as related, and 3 unrelated to Bevacizumab. Most AEs reported in this study (33.9%) were general disorders and administration site conditions, followed by gastrointestinal disorders (29.1%). The most frequently reported AEs were diarrhea (11.3%), asthenia (10.3%), headache (8.9%), pain (7.4%), vomiting (7.9%), and neutropenia (5.9%). At the end of the study, 2 (1.75%) of 69 patients reported antibodies to Bevacizumab without affecting safety and efficacy. However, at the end of 12 months, no patient had reported antibodies to Bevacizumab. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were reported in 18.3%, 22.6%, 9.6%, and 8.7% of patients, respectively. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was reported in 40.9% of patients at the end of the study. Disease control rate (DCR), also known as the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was reported in 50.4% of patients. Conclusions: Bevacizumab (Cizumab, Hetero Biopharma) was observed to be safe, well tolerated, lacking immunogenicity, and efficacious in the treatment of solid tumors. The findings of this phase IV study of Bevacizumab, primarily as a combination therapy regimen suggest its suitability and rationality for usage in multiple solid malignancies. Clinical Trial Registry Number: CTRI/2018/4/13371 [Registered on CTRI http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php : 19/04/2018]; Trial Registered Prospectively.

Bioequivalence of a hybrid pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride injection and Caelyx®: A single-dose, randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-period crossover study in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of a hybrid pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) hydrochloride injection with reference product Caelyx®. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, bioequivalence study was conducted in female patients aged ≥18 years and ≤75 years with ovarian cancer, whose disease progressed or recurred after platinum-based chemotherapy, and who were scheduled to start PLD therapy. Patients were intravenously infused drugs over 1 h at 50 mg/m2 dose two hours after breakfast on the first day of the chemotherapy cycle in period-I and crossed over to the other arm in period-II (day 29). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were performed using two separate, validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for encapsulated and unencapsulated doxorubicin. RESULTS: Both the test and reference formulations were well-tolerated and safe. The pharmacokinetic analysis for both encapsulated and unencapsulated doxorubicin was conducted in 50 patients and PK parameters were found to be comparable between test and reference products. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of hybrid PLD/Caelyx® were; maximum measured plasma concentration (Cmax): 91.94-97.28%, area under the plasma concentration versus time from time 0 to t (AUC0-t): 95.19-103.67%, AUC from time 0 to ∞ (AUC0-∞): 95.13-103.66% for encapsulated doxorubicin and for unencapsulated doxorubicin Cmax: 92.08-116.46%, AUC0-t: 91.91-108.28%, AUC0-∞: 93.45-110.05%. CONCLUSION: The PLD formulation was found to be bioequivalent to Caelyx®.

Generic Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Survival of the Cheapest.

INTRODUCTION: The patent expiration of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec; Novartis) on February 1, 2016, has brought the focus back on generic versions of the drug, and an opportunity to provide a safe and cost-effective alternative. The objective of our study was to determine the molecular and cytogenetic responses, survival endpoints (event-free survival, failure-free survival, transformation-free survival, overall survival), and safety of innovator and generic brands of imatinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, data from 1812 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with frontline imatinib mesylate (innovator/generic) at a single institution between 2008 and 2014 is included. Of these, 445 were excluded owing to inadequate data and follow-up, and a further 156 were excluded as they were in either the accelerated phase or blast crisis at diagnosis. Thus, data from 1067 patients who were treated with Gleevec (Novartis), and 144 patients with Veenat (NATCO) were available for analysis, and included in the study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in event-free survival (P = .05), failure-free survival (P = .07), transformation-free survival (P = .12), or overall survival (P = .24) between the 2 groups. The frequency of reported nonhematologic adverse events and hematologic adverse events was comparable between the study groups. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study showed comparable efficacy and safety of the generic and innovator versions of imatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 8 years' experience from a tertiary care center in India.

INTRODUCTION: The Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality associated with adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurring in 20% to 40% of patients. It is also detected in 2% to 5% of children with ALL. Historically, patients with Ph-positive ALL carried a dismal prognosis, with poor response to most chemotherapy combinations, short remission durations, and long-term disease-free survival rates of 10% to 20%. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized therapy of Ph-positive ALL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective and descriptive single center study was carried out based on data retrieved of 508 patients treated for ALL from 2007 to 2014. Of these thirty patients were Ph-positive ALL and were available for analysis, and these patients were included in the study. Ph-positive ALL was defined as ALL carrying the t(9;22) translocation on standard karyotype and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and/or positivity for BCR-ABL fusion transcript detection by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) analysis. Patients were treated with combination chemotherapy and oral TKIs and responses were classified as either CR defined by the absence of circulating blasts and <5% marrow blasts on a bone marrow examination done at the end of induction chemotherapy or failure, including persistent disease and early death. RESULTS: There were 30 (5.9%) cases of Ph-positive ALL out of a total of 508 cases of ALL with a median age of 27.5 years (range: 7-55). The choice of first line TKI was Imatinib in 25 (83.3 %) patients and Dasatinib in 1 (3.3 %) patient. Fourteen patients (46.6 %) had a CR, 3 (10 %) had a partial response (PR), 8 (26.6 %) had persistence of disease at the end of induction chemotherapy. The overall survival in those who received sequential chemotherapy followed by TKI (n = 4) was 28.5 months (95% CI 10.78 to 46.21 months) compared with 13.98 months (95% CI 6.04 to 21.97 months) for patients who received concurrent chemotherapy and TKI (n = 20); log rank (Mantel Cox) X2 = 8.33, P = 0.040), however limited sample precluded meaningful subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that we still have a long way to go to match outcomes of western published series, even when the same treatment protocol is used, probably due to the underutilization of Allogeneic SCT as an option in first CR.