Hazard evaluation of polystyrene nanoplastic with nine bioassays did not show particle-specific acute toxicity.

Plastic is a wide-spread pollutant and must be evaluated for potential adverse effects of its breakdown product, microplastic (≤5 mm) along with its subfraction, nanoplastic (1-100 nm). Risk assessment of pollutants cannot be conducted without their toxicity (dose-response) data. In this study, toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPL) was evaluated using 8 acute and 1 subchronic toxicity assays with 10 organisms of different biological complexity (bacteria, yeast, algae, protozoans, mammalian cells in vitro, crustaceans, midge larvae). Commercial 26 and 100 nm carboxylated PS-NPL spheres were chosen as model and tested in nominal concentrations up to 100 mg/L (1.025·1016 26 nm and 1.83·1014 100 nm particles/L). In most of the assays, both PS-NPL proved non-toxic (L(E)C50 > 100 mg/L) but three tests (V. fischeri, R. subcapitata, D. magna) flagged toxicity in 'as received' 26 nm PS-NPL and D. magna also in 100 nm PS-NPL (EC50 ranging from 13 to 71 mg/L). As, according to manufacturers, both PS-NPL suspensions contained additives (surfactants and biocidal NaN3), the three toxicity tests were repeated also on dialysed PS-NPL and on NaN3. Non-toxicity of dialysed PS-NPL indicated that the toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not particle-specific but false positive due to water-soluble additives in the PS-NPL preparations. NaN3 was very toxic to D. magna (48 h EC50 = 0.05 ± 0.03 mg NaN3/L), toxic to R. subcapitata (72 h EC50 = 4.97 ± 3.7 mg NaN3/L) and non-toxic to V. fischeri. Toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not fully explainable by NaN3 but also attributable to other additives in the suspensions. Toxicity research of microplastic using commercial model particles must always consider the potential influence of additives, e.g. test the toxicity of dialysed NPL for comparison. In our study, D. magna, R. subcapitata and V. fischeri were the most sensitive to PS-NPL water-soluble additives and flagged their presence in NPL preparations.

The Potential for Long-Term Sustainability in Seminatural Forestry: A Broad Perspective Based on Woodpecker Populations.

We assessed ecological sustainability of seminatural forestry by analyzing 80-year dynamics and the current distribution of all woodpecker species in Estonia. We found that, despite the clear-cutting-based forestry system, woodpeckers inhabited commercial seminatural forests in substantial numbers, including the species generally considered vulnerable to timber harvesting. The only negative trend, a drastic decline in the Green Woodpecker, paralleled the loss of seminatural, wooded grasslands and is mostly an issue for landscape planning and agricultural land use. Major silvicultural factors supporting other species in commercial forests include natural regeneration with multiple native tree species and deadwood abundance. In such context, the main role of protected areas is to provide ecological resilience; however, we estimated that the current strict reserves could further double their carrying capacities for woodpeckers through successional recovery and, perhaps, active restoration. The long time series used were instrumental in detecting unexpected dynamics and the impacts of climatically extreme years. We conclude that (1) seminatural forestry can serve as a basis for reconciling timber harvesting and biodiversity protection at the landscape scale, given appropriate attention to key structures and landscape zoning and (2) woodpeckers represent a biological indicator system for the sustainability of forest landscapes in Europe.