Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 77(9): 889-92, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9808375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about vertical transmission of HCV is still limited. In this study we followed up the virological status of a series of offspring born to anti-HCV positive, anti-HIV negative mothers. METHODS: Between January 1993 and January 1995, 5000 consecutive, anti-HIV negative pregnant women were screened for anti-HCV (ELISA III) and all positive samples were confirmed by RIBA III and analyzed for HCV-RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Babies born to anti-HCV positive mothers were followed from birth to two years by testing for ALT levels, anti-HCV antibodies and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Of 5000 mothers 80 (1.6%) were anti-HCV positive (ELISA III) and RIBA III positive. Of these, 56 (70%) were HCV-RNA positive. We examined 80 babies, born to anti-HCV positive mothers: 56 with HCV-RNA positive mothers and 24 with HCV-RNA negative mothers. Two babies (3.6%) of 56 were anti-HCV and HCV-RNA positive, with normal liver function tests. Seventy-eight babies (97.5%) of 80 (54 with HCV-RNA positive mothers and 24 with HCV-RNA negative mothers) were HCV-RNA negative, with normal liver function tests and detectable levels of anti-HCV antibodies that gradually disappeared between 8-12 months. CONCLUSION: Mother-to-infant transmission of HCV is possible only in the case of HCV-RNA positive mothers. In our study the rate of transmission is 3.6%, (2/56 babies with HCV-RNA positive mothers). HCV transmission may occur without evident association with breast-feeding or vaginal delivery.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C Antibodies/immunology , Hepatitis C/virology , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/transmission , Humans , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Pregnancy
2.
J Chemother ; 4(5): 312-20, 1992 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1479422

ABSTRACT

Chronic GnRH analogs (GnRH-A) administration has proven to be effective for the control of some hormone-dependent tumors. GnRH-A are now in the standard treatment of prostatic cancer. In the present paper experimental and clinical data on the use of GnRH-A in gynecologic oncology are reviewed in order to identify a possible role in the therapy of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Besides the indirect hormonal effect of GnRH-A, mediated by the suppression of gonadal steroidogenesis, in vitro evidence suggests a direct anti-proliferative action involving autocrine-paracrine regulation of cellular function. In advanced or recurrent breast cancer objective responses were observed in 157 out of 378 premenopausal patients (41%) and in 18 out of 166 postmenopausal women (10%). In ovarian cancer complete and partial responses were observed in 14 out of 121 (11%). At present, data on advanced endometrial carcinoma are limited: only 18 treated patients are reported, of whom 7 responded (38.8%). However, in general, most of the responses observed were transient. Thus, so far, the use of GnRH-A in gynecologic oncology has to be considered for palliation, after the failure of other better understood treatment modalities. The possible use of GnRH-A as an adjuvant is still under investigation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/therapeutic use , Humans
3.
Radiology ; 185(1): 201-5, 1992 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1523308

ABSTRACT

One hundred twenty-four patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix were examined with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) before treatment. Since surgery preceded any other kind of therapy, sonographic findings could be compared with the surgical pathologic stage. The accuracy of staging with TRUS was 83%, compared with an accuracy of 78% for clinical staging performed according to the criteria of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). For extent of parametrial involvement, the sensitivity of TRUS evaluation was 78%, with a specificity of 89% and a diagnostic accuracy of 87%. The same reliability parameters for clinical evaluation were 52%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. From these data and from analysis of the cases--in which a discrepancy between clinical and TRUS staging was observed--it can be concluded that TRUS could be usefully applied to routine pretreatment evaluation of patients with cervical carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Methods , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL