The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology for Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical interventions are the mainstay of treatment for many gynecological cancers. Although minimally invasive surgery offers many potential advantages, performing laparoscopic pelvic surgery in obese patients remains challenging. To overcome this, many centers have shifted their practice to robotic surgery; however, the high costs associated with robotic surgery are concerning and limit its use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of performing laparoscopic gynecologic oncology procedures in obese and morbidly obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries by a gynecologic oncologist from January 2012 to June 2016 at a designated gynecologic oncology center. Patients were categorized as nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m), and morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m). Intra and postoperative complications and outcomes were recorded. Group differences were computed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (continuous) or Fisher exact test (categorical). RESULTS: Of 497 patients, 288 were nonobese (58%), 162 obese (33%), and 47 morbidly obese (9%). Complex surgical procedures were performed in 57.4% of obese patients and 55.3% of morbidly obese patients. Although morbidly obese and obese patients had longer operative times (mean of 181 and 166 minutes vs 144 minutes, P = 0.014), conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy occurred in 9.05% of all patients, with no group differences. Low intraoperative (9%-11%) and severe postoperative (2.41%) complication rates were observed overall, with no group differences. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of emergency room visits 30 days postoperation between the 3 BMI groups (P = 0.6108). Average length of postoperative stay was statistically significant (P = 0.0003) but was low overall (1-2 days). Hospital readmission rates were low, with the lowest rate among morbidly obese patients (2.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that laparoscopic gynecologic-oncology procedures for obese patients are feasible and safe.

Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic surgical approaches to lymphadenectomy for high-risk endometrial cancer staging. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent surgery for pathologic high-risk endometrial carcinoma at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2013. The primary outcome, the median number of nodes retrieved, was compared based on surgical technique. The secondary outcome was the detection of metastatic nodes. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients who underwent surgery for high-risk endometrial cancer were included, of whom 147 (83.5%) had pelvic and 78 (44.3%) had para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Laparotomy, laparoscopy, and robotic approaches were applied for 69 (39.2%), 44 (25.0%), and 63 (35.8%) patients, respectively. Minimally-invasive staging was associated with an increased proportion of patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with laparotomy (P=0.005). The median number of nodes removed in the pelvis and para-aortic regions did not differ between surgical approaches. The detection of metastatic nodes was also similar between the groups. Increased blood loss (P<0.001) and longer hospital admission (P<0.001) were observed with laparotomy procedures. CONCLUSION: All three techniques demonstrated adequate staging of high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Based on improved peri-operative outcomes, the use of minimally-invasive techniques is advocated where appropriate.

Emergency Caesarean Section in Obese Parturients: Is a 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval Feasible?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of obesity on decision-to-incision and decision-to-delivery time intervals in emergency Caesarean section. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of emergency Caesarean sections performed between 2005 and 2009. Indications for emergency Caesarean section were defined as those posing an immediate threat to the life of the mother or fetus. The primary outcomes were the time intervals from decision for emergency delivery to skin incision, and decision to delivery of the infant. The secondary outcome was a composite of poor neonatal outcomes comprising umbilical cord artery pH lt; 7.20, Apgar score lt; 7 at five minutes, admission to NICU, or neonatal death. RESULTS: A total of 232 women underwent emergency Caesarean section, and 140 of these met the inclusion criteria. At the time of delivery, 78/140 (55.7%) patients were categorized as obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m2). The median decision-to-incision and decision-to-delivery intervals were significantly longer in the obese group, with a median delay of 4.5 minutes in both time intervals. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated prolongation of the decision-to-incision interval in the obese group (hazard ratio 0.71, P lt; 0.05). There was no difference in the neonatal composite outcome, but there was a significant reduction in median five-minute Apgar score in the obese group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Obesity is associated with prolonged decision-to-incision and decision-to-delivery intervals, without associated neonatal morbidity, in a tertiary hospital setting. Further studies are required to assess the specific factors limiting expedient delivery in this population.

Objective : Déterminer l'effet de l'obésité sur les intervalles décision-incision et décision-accouchement en ce qui concerne la tenue d'une césarienne d'urgence. Méthodes : Nous avons mené une étude rétrospective portant sur les césariennes d'urgence menées entre 2005 et 2009. Les indications menant à la tenue d'une césarienne d'urgence ont été définies comme étant celles qui constituaient une menace immédiate pour la vie de la mère ou celle du fœtus. Les critères d'évaluation principaux ont été l'intervalle entre la décision de procéder à un accouchement d'urgence et l'exécution de l'incision cutanée, et l'intervalle entre cette décision et la naissance de l'enfant. Le critère d'évaluation secondaire était un composite de diverses mauvaises issues néonatales, dont un pH artériel (cordon ombilical) lt; 7,20, un indice d'Apgar lt; 7 à cinq minutes, l'admission à l'UNSI et le décès néonatal. Résultats : Au total, 232 femmes ont subi une césarienne d'urgence et 140 d'entre elles répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. Au moment de l'accouchement, 78/140 (55,7 %) patientes ont été catégorisées comme étant obèses (IMC ≥ 30kg/m2). Les intervalles décision-incision et décision-accouchement médians étaient considérablement plus longs dans le groupe des femmes obèses (délai médian de 4,5 minutes pour ce qui est de ces deux intervalles). L'analyse du délai avant la survenue de l'événement a démontré la prolongation de l'intervalle décision-incision au sein du groupe des femmes obèses (rapport de risque, 0,71; P lt; 0,05). Bien qu'aucune différence n'ait été constatée en ce qui concerne l'issue composite néonatale, une baisse significative de l'indice d'Apgar médian à cinq minutes a été observée au sein du groupe des femmes obèses (P = 0,02). Conclusion : L'obésité est associée à une prolongation des intervalles décision-incision et décision-accouchement, sans répercussions connexes sur la morbidité néonatale, en milieu hospitalier tertiaire. La tenue d'autres études s'avère requise pour l'évaluation des facteurs particuliers qui limitent la tenue d'un accouchement en temps opportun au sein de cette population.

The subfornical organ: a central target for circulating feeding signals.

The mechanisms through which circulating ghrelin relays hunger signals to the CNS are not yet fully understood. In this study, we have examined the potential role of the subfornical organ (SFO), a circumventricular structure that lacks the normal blood-brain barrier, as a CNS site in which ghrelin acts to influence the hypothalamic centers controlling food intake. We report that ghrelin increased intracellular calcium concentrations in 28% (12 of 43) of dissociated SFO neurons and that the SFO expresses mRNA for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Whole-cell patch recordings from SFO neurons demonstrated that in 29% (9 of 31) of neurons tested ghrelin induced a mean depolarization of 7.4 +/- 0.69 mV, accompanied by an increase in action potential frequency. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed that ghrelin activates a putative nonselective cationic conductance. Previous reports that the satiety signal amylin exerts similar excitatory effects on SFO neurons led us to examine whether these two peptides influence different subpopulations of SFO neurons. Concentration-dependent depolarizing effects of amylin were observed in 59% (28 of 47) of SFO neurons (mean depolarization, 8.32 +/- 0.60 mV). In contrast to ghrelin, voltage-clamp recordings suggest that amylin influences a voltage-dependent current activated at depolarized potentials. We tested single SFO neurons with both peptides and identified cells responsive only to ghrelin (n = 9) and only to amylin (n = 7) but no cells that responded to both peptides. These data support a role for the SFO as a center at which ghrelin and amylin may influence separate subpopulations of neurons to influence the hypothalamic regulation of feeding.