Periventricular nodular heterotopia in patients with a prenatal diagnosis of myelomeningocele/myeloschisis: associations with seizures and neurodevelopmental outcomes during early childhood.

PURPOSE: Historically, the presence of gray matter heterotopia was a concern for adverse postnatal neurocognitive status in patients undergoing fetal closure of open spinal dysraphism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes and the onset of seizures during early childhood in patients with a prenatal diagnosis of myelomeningocele/myeloschisis (MMC) and periventricular nodular heterotopia (PVNH). METHODS: All patients evaluated at the Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment with a diagnosis of MMC between June 2016 to March 2023 were identified. PVNH was determined from prenatal and/or postnatal MRI. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (edition III or IV) were used for neurodevelopmental assessments. Patients were screened for seizures/epilepsy. RESULTS: Of 497 patients evaluated with a prenatal diagnosis of MMC, 99 were found to have PVNH on prenatal MRI, of which 35 had confirmed PVNH on postnatal imaging. From the 497 patients, 398 initially did not exhibit heterotopia on prenatal MRI, but 47 of these then had confirmed postnatal PVNH. The presence of PVNH was not a significant risk factor for postnatal seizures in early childhood. The average neurodevelopmental scores were not significantly different among heterotopia groups for cognitive, language, and motor domains. CONCLUSION: The presence of PVNH in patients with a prenatal diagnosis of MMC does not indicate an increased risk for neurodevelopmental delay at 1 year of age. We did not demonstrate an association with seizures/epilepsy. These findings can aid clinicians in prenatal consultation regarding fetal repair of open spinal dysraphism. Long-term follow-up is required to discern the true association between PVNH seen on prenatal imaging and postnatal seizures/epilepsy and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Low Household Income Increases Hospital Length of Stay and Decreases Home Discharge Rates in Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Matched Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: Low median household income (MHI) has been correlated with worsened surgical outcomes, but few studies have rigorously controlled for demographic and medical factors at the patient level. This study isolates the relationship between MHI and surgical outcomes in a lumbar fusion cohort using coarsened exact matching. METHODS: Patients undergoing single-level, posterior lumbar fusion at a single institution were consecutively enrolled and retrospectively analyzed (n = 4263). Zip code was cross-referenced to census data to derive MHI. Univariate regression correlated MHI to outcomes. Patients with low MHI were matched to those with high MHI based on demographic and medical factors. Outcomes evaluated included complications, length of stay, discharge disposition, 30- and 90 day readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and mortality. RESULTS: By univariate analysis, MHI was significantly associated with 30- and 90 day readmission, ED visits, reoperation, and non-home discharge, but not mortality. After exact matching (n = 270), low-income patients had higher odds of non-home discharge (OR = 2.5, P = .016) and higher length of stay (mean 100.2 vs 92.6, P = .02). There were no differences in surgical complications, ED visits, readmissions, or reoperations between matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low MHI was significantly associated with adverse short-term outcomes from lumbar fusion. A matched analysis controlling for confounding variables uncovered longer lengths of stay and higher rates of discharge to post-acute care (vs home) in lower MHI patients. Socioeconomic disparities affect health beyond access to care, worsen surgical outcomes, and impose costs on healthcare systems. Targeted interventions must be implemented to mitigate these disparities.

Use of a machine learning algorithm with a focus on spinopelvic parameters to predict development of symptomatic tethered cord after initial untethering surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Among patients with a history of prior lipomyelomeningocele repair, an association between increased lumbosacral angle (LSA) and cord retethering has been described. The authors sought to build a predictive algorithm to determine which complex tethered cord patients will develop the symptoms of spinal cord retethering after initial surgical repair with a focus on spinopelvic parameters. METHODS: An electronic medical record database was reviewed to identify patients with complex tethered cord (e.g., lipomyelomeningocele, lipomyeloschisis, myelocystocele) who underwent detethering before 12 months of age between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population. The Caret package in R was used to develop a machine learning model that predicted symptom development by using spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified (28/72 [38.9%] were male). The most commonly observed dysraphism was lipomyelomeningocele (41/72 [56.9%]). The mean ± SD age at index MRI was 2.1 ± 2.2 months, at which time 87.5% of patients (63/72) were asymptomatic. The mean ± SD lumbar lordosis at the time of index MRI was 23.8° ± 11.1°, LSA was 36.5° ± 12.3°, sacral inclination was 30.4° ± 11.3°, and sacral slope was 23.0° ± 10.5°. Overall, 39.6% (25/63) of previously asymptomatic patients developed new symptoms during the mean ± SD follow-up period of 44.9 ± 47.2 months. In the recursive partitioning model, patients whose LSA increased at a rate ≥ 5.84°/year remained asymptomatic, whereas those with slower rates of LSA change experienced neurological decline (sensitivity 77.5%, specificity 84.9%, positive predictive value 88.9%, and negative predictive value 70.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to build a machine learning algorithm to predict symptom development of spinal cord retethering after initial surgical repair. The authors found that, after initial surgery, patients who demonstrate a slower rate of LSA change per year may be at risk of developing neurological symptoms.

Racial disparities in short-term spinal fusion outcomes across 4263 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Race plays a salient role in access to surgical care. However, few investigations have assessed the impact of race within surgical populations after care has been delivered. The objective of this study was to employ an exact matching protocol to a homogenous population of spine surgery patients in order to isolate the relationships between race and short-term postoperative outcomes. METHODS: In total, 4263 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a single multihospital academic medical center were retrospectively enrolled. Of these patients, 3406 patients self-identified as White and 857 patients self-identified as non-White. Outcomes were initially compared across all patients via logistic regression. Subsequently, White patients and non-White patients were exactly matched on the basis of key demographic and health characteristics (1520 matched patients). Outcome disparities were evaluated between the exact-matched cohorts. Primary outcomes were readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, intraoperative complications, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Before matching, non-White patients were less likely to be discharged home and more likely to be readmitted, evaluated in the ED, and undergo reoperation. After matching, non-White patients experienced higher rates of nonhome discharge, readmissions, and ED visits. Non-White patients did not have more surgical complications either before or after matching. CONCLUSIONS: Between otherwise similar cohorts of spinal fusion cases, non-White patients experienced unfavorable discharge disposition and higher risk of multiple adverse postoperative outcomes. However, these findings were not accounted for by differences in surgical complications, suggesting that structural factors underlie the observed disparities.

Association Between Race and Short-Term Outcomes Across 3988 Consecutive Single-Level Spinal Fusions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Race has implications for access to medical care. However, the impact of race, after access to care has been attained, remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to isolate the relationship between race and short-term outcomes across patients undergoing a single, common neurosurgical procedure. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 3988 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only open lumbar fusion at a single, multihospital, academic medical center were enrolled over a 6-year period. Among them, 3406 patients self-identified as White, and 582 patients self-identified as Black. Outcome disparities between all White patients vs all Black patients were estimated using logistic regression. Subsequently, coarsened exact matching controlled for outcome-mitigating factors; White and Black patients were exact-matched 1:1 on key demographic and health characteristics (matched n = 1018). Primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, mortality, discharge disposition, and intraoperative complication. RESULTS: Before matching, Black patients experienced increased rate of nonhome discharge, readmissions, ED visits, and reoperations (all P < .001). After exact matching, Black patients were less likely to be discharged to home (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, P < .001) and had higher risk of 30-day and 90-day readmissions (OR 2.24, P < .001; OR 1.91, P < .001; respectively) and ED visits (OR 1.79, P = .017; OR 2.09, P < .001). Black patients did not experience greater risk of intraoperative complication (unintentional durotomy). CONCLUSION: Between otherwise homogenous spinal fusion cohorts, Black patients experienced unfavorable short-term outcomes. These disparities were not explained by differences in intraoperative complications. Further investigation must characterize and mitigate institutional and societal factors that contribute to outcome disparities.

Craniosynostosis in primary metabolic bone disorders: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: The incidence of metabolic bone diseases in pediatric neurosurgical patients is rare. We examined our institutional experience of metabolic bone diseases along with a review of the literature in an effort to understand management for this rare entity. METHODS: Retrospective review of the electronic medical record database was performed to identify patients with primary metabolic bone disorders who underwent craniosynostosis surgery between 2011 and 2022 at a quaternary referral pediatric hospital. Literature review was conducted for primary metabolic bone disorders associated with craniosynostosis. RESULTS: Ten patients were identified, 6 of whom were male. The most common bone disorders were hypophosphatemic rickets (n = 2) and pseudohypoparathyroidism (n = 2). The median age at diagnosis of metabolic bone disorder was 2.02 years (IQR: 0.11-4.26), 2.52 years (IQR: 1.24-3.14) at craniosynostosis diagnosis, and 2.65 years (IQR: 0.91-3.58) at the time of surgery. Sagittal suture was most commonly fused (n = 4), followed by multi-suture craniosynostosis (n = 3). Other imaging findings included Chiari (n = 1), hydrocephalus (n = 1), and concurrent Chiari and hydrocephalus (n = 1). All patients underwent surgery for craniosynostosis, with the most common operation being bifronto-orbital advancement (n = 4). A total of 5 patients underwent reoperation, 3 of which were planned second-stage surgeries and 2 of whom had craniosynostosis recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate screening for suture abnormalities in children with primary metabolic bone disorders. While cranial vault remodeling is not associated with a high rate of postoperative complications in this patient cohort, craniosynostosis recurrences may occur, and parental counseling is recommended.

Large scalp venous malformation in a pediatric patient managed with sclerotherapy and surgery: a case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Venous malformations (VMs) are slow-flow vascular anomalies present at birth that enlarge during adolescence, subsequently causing thrombosis, hemorrhage, and pain. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of an adolescent male presenting with a large scalp venous malformation. Given the size and location of the lesion, a hybrid approach employing both sclerotherapy and surgical resection was utilized. The VM was successfully removed without complication. CONCLUSION: A hybrid approach is a safe and effective treatment consideration for immediate management of large venous malformation in higher-risk locations.

Language and Geographic Representation of Neurosurgical Journals: A Meta-Science Study.

OBJECTIVE: Medical journals have a role in promoting representation of neurosurgeons who speak primary languages other than English. We sought to characterize the language of publication and geographic origin of neurosurgical journals, delineate associations between impact factor (IF) and language and geographic variables, and describe steps to overcome language barriers to publishing. METHODS: Web of Science, Scopus, and Ulrich's Serial Analysis system were searched for neurosurgery journals. The journals were screened for relevance. Language of publication, country and World Health Organization region, World Bank income status and gross domestic product, and citation metrics were extracted. RESULTS: Of 867 journals, 74 neurosurgical journals were included. Common publication languages were English (52, 70.3%), Mandarin (5, 6.8%), and Spanish (4, 5.4%). Countries of publication for the greatest number of journals were the United States (23, 31.1%), United Kingdom (8, 10.8%), and China (6, 8.1%). Most journals originated from the Americas region (29, 39.2%), the European region (28, 37.8%), and from high-income countries (n = 54, 73.0%). Median IF was 1.55 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.89-2.40). Journals written in English (1.77 [IQR 1.00-2.87], P = 0.032) and from high-income countries (1.81 [IQR 1.0-2.70], P = 0.046) had highest median IF. When excluding outliers, there was a small but positive correlation between per capita gross domestic product and IF (ß = 0.021, P = 0.03, R2 = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Language concordance represents a substantial barrier to research equity in neurosurgery, limiting dissemination of ideas of merit that currently have inadequate outlets for readership. Initiatives aimed at increasing the accessibility of neurosurgical publishing to underrepresented authors are essential.

Understanding the Natural History of Postoperative Pain and Patient-Reported Opioid Consumption After Elective Spine and Nerve Surgeries With an Automated Text Messaging System.

BACKGROUND: There is a gap in understanding how to ensure opioid stewardship while managing postoperative neurosurgical pain. OBJECTIVE: To describe self-reported opioid consumption and pain intensity after common neurosurgery procedures gathered using an automated text messaging system. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed at a large, urban academic health system in Pennsylvania. Adult patients (≥ 18 years), who underwent surgeries between October 2019 and May 2020, were consented. Data on postoperative pain intensity and patient-reported opioid consumption were collected prospectively for 3 months. We analyzed the association between the quantity of opioids prescribed and consumed. RESULTS: A total of 517 patients were enrolled. The median pain intensity at discharge was 5 out of a maximum of pain score of 10 and was highest after thoracolumbar fusion (median: 6, interquartile range [IQR]: 4-7). During the follow-up period, patients were prescribed a median of 40 tablets of 5-mg oxycodone equivalent pills (IQR: 28-40) and reported taking a median of 28 tablet equivalents (IQR: 17-40). Responders who were opioid-naive vs opioid-tolerant took a similar median number of opioid pills postoperatively (28 [IQR: 17-40] vs 27.5 [17.5-40], respectively). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the quantity of opioids prescribed and used during the 3-month follow-up (Pearson R = 0.85, 95% CI [0.80-0.89], P < .001). The correlation was stronger among patients who were discharged to a higher level of care. CONCLUSION: Using real-time, patient-centered pain assessment and opioid consumption data will allow for the development of evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines after spinal and nerve surgery.