Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 33(5): 895-901, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421152

ABSTRACT

In critical illness hypo-and hyperglycemia have a negative influence on patient outcome. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could help in early detection of hypo-and hyperglycemia. A requirement for these new methods is an acceptable accuracy and precision in clinical practice. In this pilot study we prospectively evaluated the accuracy and precision of two CGM sensors (subcutaneous sensor: Sentrino®, Medtronic and intravasal sensor: Glucoclear®, Edwards) in 20 patients on a cardio-surgical ICU in a head to head comparison. CGM data were recorded for up to 48 h and values were compared with blood-gas-analysis (BGA) values, analysed with Bland-Altman-plots and color-coded surveillance error-grids. Shown are means ± standard deviations. In total 270/255 intravasal/subcutaneous pairs with BGA-values were analysed. The average runtime of the sensors was 28.4 ± 6.4 h. Correlation with BGA values yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.76 (subcutaneous sensor) and 0.92 (intravasal sensor). The Bland Altman Plots revealed an accuracy of 2.5 mg/dl, and a precision of + 43.0 mg/dl to - 38.0 mg/dl (subcutaneous sensor) and an accuracy of - 6.0 mg/dl, and a precision of + 12.4 mg/dl to - 24.4 mg/dl (intravasal sensor). No severe hypoglycemic event, defined as BG level below 40 mg/dl, occurred during treatment. Both sensors showed good accuracy in comparison to the BGA values, however they differ regarding precision, which in case of the subcutaneous sensor is considerable high.


Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis/instrumentation , Blood Glucose/analysis , Intensive Care Units , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Female , Glucose Oxidase/chemistry , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/blood , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed ; 110(5): 360-3, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676120

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycemia is a frequent and feared complication of insulin therapy on the intensive care unit (ICU). Sedated patients in particular are at risk for hypoglycemia due to the absence of clinical symptoms. Furthermore, recent studies point to a correlation between the variability of blood glucose and mortality. Therefore, continuous glucose monitoring has the potential to influence outcome due to a better control of blood glucose in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy, accuracy and safety of a new commercially available subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system (sCGM; Sentrino®, Medtronic) in a pilot study in critically ill adult patients. sCGM data were recorded for up to 72 h and values were compared with blood glucose values measured by cassette-based blood gas analyzer (BGA). RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (eight male, six female), with a mean age of 62.1 ± 9.8 years, referred to the ICU after major abdominal surgery were studied. The average simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) was 35 ± 9. Three patients had known type II diabetes. The average runtime of sensors was 44.1 ± 22.1 h. In comparison to BGA, measurement of blood glucose by sCGM revealed an accuracy of 1.5 mg/dl, and a precision of +34.2 mg/dl to -31.2 mg/dl. Linn's concordance correlation coefficient yielded 0.74 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.68-0.78. No hypoglycemic events, defined as a blood glucose level below 70 mg/dl, occurred during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: sCGM monitoring via a subcutaneous sensor demonstrated high accuracy and considerable variability compared to blood gas samples, even in critically ill patients.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Monitoring, Physiologic/instrumentation , Aged , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Insulin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Care , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Subcutaneous Tissue , Treatment Outcome
3.
Anaesthesist ; 63(1): 73-86, 2014 Jan.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24402512

ABSTRACT

In times of growing bacterial resistance against antimicrobiotic drugs the broad prescription of antibiotics in human medicine must be carefully considered. The perioperative antibiotic treatment is in the center of that conflict. On the one hand an efficient pathogen reduction for the preemptive treatment of infectious complications is desired but on the other hand it is suspected that this promotes the selection of multiresistant pathogens which could lead to an increase of more complicated nosocomial infections. The aim of this article is a critical appraisal of this subject on the basis of the 2012 guidelines of the German working group of Hygiene in Hospital and Practice (AWMF) and the 2010 recommendations of the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Perioperative Care/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Germany , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...