Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
J Occup Rehabil ; 26(2): 195-203, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319413

ABSTRACT

Purpose Work ability is commonly measured with self-assessments, in the form of indices or single items. The validity of these assessments lies in their predictive ability. Prospective studies have reported associations between work ability and sickness absence and disability pension, but few examined why these associations exist. Several correlates of work ability have been reported, but their mechanistic role is largely unknown. This study aims to investigate to what extent individual's own prognosis of work ability predicts labor market participation and whether this was due to individual characteristics and/or working conditions. Methods Self-assessed prognosis of work ability, 2 years from "now," in the Stockholm Public Health Questionnaire (2002-2003) was linked to national registers on sickness absence, disability pension and unemployment up to year 2010. Effects were studied with Cox regression models. Results Of a total of 12,064 individuals 1466 reported poor work ability. There were 299 cases of disability pension, 1466 long-term sickness absence cases and 765 long-term unemployed during follow-up. Poor work ability increased the risk of long-term sickness absence (HR 2.25, CI 95 % 1.97-2.56), disability pension (HR 5.19, CI 95 % 4.07-6.62), and long-term unemployment (HR 2.18, CI 95 % 1.83-2.60). These associations were partially explained by baseline health conditions, physical and (less strongly) psychosocial aspects of working conditions. Conclusions Self-assessed poor ability predicted future long-term sickness absence, disability pension and long-term unemployment. Self-assessed poor work ability seems to be an indicator of future labor market exclusion of different kinds, and can be used in public health monitoring.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Forecasting , Pensions/statistics & numerical data , Self-Assessment , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Unemployment/trends , Absenteeism , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 73(6): 975-81, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24665117

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study was part of the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study and aimed to quantify the burden arising from low back pain (LBP) due to occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors. METHODS: Exposure prevalence was based on occupation distribution; estimates of relative risk came from a meta-analysis of relevant published literature. The work-related burden was estimated as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Estimates were made for each of 21 world regions and 187 countries, separately for 1990 and 2010 using consistent methods. RESULTS: Worldwide, LBP arising from ergonomic exposures at work was estimated to cause 21.7 million DALYs in 2010. The overall population attributable fraction was 26%, varying considerably with age, sex and region. 62% of LBP DALYs were in males-the largest numbers were in persons aged 35-55 years. The highest relative risk (3.7) was in the agricultural sector. The largest number of DALYs occurred in East Asia and South Asia, but on a per capita basis the biggest burden was in Oceania. There was a 22% increase in overall LBP DALYs arising from occupational exposures between 1990 and 2010 due to population growth; rates dropped by 14% over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: LBP arising from ergonomic exposures at work is an important cause of disability. There is a need for improved information on exposure distributions and relative risks, particularly in developing countries.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Asia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oceania/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
3.
Ergonomics ; 54(2): 206-19, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21294018

ABSTRACT

The objective of this pilot study was to identify if notebook accessories (ergonomic chair, desktop monitor and notebook riser) combined with a wireless keyboard, mouse and participatory ergonomics training would have the greatest impact on reducing self-reported upper extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in university students. In addition to pre-post computing and health surveys, the Ecological Momentary Assessment was used to capture change in discomfort over time using a personal digital assistant (PDA) as the e-diary. The PDA was programmed with a survey containing 45 questions. Four groups of university students were randomised to either intervention (three external computer accessories) or to control. Participants reported less discomfort with the ergonomic chair and notebook riser based on the pre-post survey data and the e-diary/PDA ANOVA analysis. However, the PDA data, adjusted for the effect of hours per day of computer use, showed no benefit of the chair and limited benefit from the riser. Statement of Relevance:University students' use of notebook computers has increased. This study found evidence of a positive effect of an adjustable chair or notebook riser when combined with ergonomic training on reducing discomfort. Daily notebook computer use of 4 h was confirmed as a risk factor. Without some form of ergonomic intervention, these students are likely to enter the workforce with poor computing habits, which places them on the road to future injuries as technology continues to play a dominant role in their lives.


Subject(s)
Computers, Handheld , Medical Records , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Students , Universities , User-Computer Interface , Adolescent , Analysis of Variance , Boston , Computer Peripherals , Ergonomics , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Pain/etiology , Posture/physiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Upper Extremity , Young Adult
4.
Eur Respir J ; 35(2): 279-86, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19741032

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to quantify and describe the variations in respiratory symptoms and diagnosis prevalence across regions of the world according to national income. In 2002 and 2003, the World Health Organization implemented the World Health Survey (WHS), which used a standardised survey instrument to compile comprehensive baseline information on health and healthcare expenditure. We analysed the WHS data to assess the global patterns of self-reported wheeze and doctor-diagnosed asthma, two commonly reported measures of respiratory health. In total there were 308,218 participants with complete records, from 64 countries. The weighted mean age of the survey population was 43 yrs. Global prevalence of current wheezing symptoms ranged from 2.4% in Vietnam to 24% in Brazil; the prevalence of diagnosed asthma ranged from 1.8% in Vietnam to 32.8% in Australia. Overall, the prevalence of symptoms and diagnosis showed a U-shaped pattern with the largest prevalence reported in low- and high-income countries. The smallest prevalence was consistently found in middle-income countries. These WHS analyses have provided global prevalence estimates of wheeze and doctor-diagnosed asthma using data gathered simultaneously and consistently across six continents. These findings support the need for continued global respiratory illness surveillance for disease prevention, health policy and management.


Subject(s)
Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Global Health , Humans , Income , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Respiratory Sounds , Social Class , World Health Organization
6.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 67(2): 218-23, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17526553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A study of whether occupational physical load predicted subsequent chronic shoulder disorders. METHODS: A comprehensive national survey was carried out among a representative sample (n = 7217) of the Finnish adult population in 1977-80. Twenty years later, 1286 participants from the previous survey were invited to be re-examined, and 909 (71%) participated. After excluding those with diagnosed shoulder disorders at baseline, 883 subjects were available for the analyses. RESULTS: At follow-up, a physician diagnosed chronic shoulder disorders in 63 subjects (7%) using a standardised protocol. Work exposure to repetitive movements and vibration at baseline increased the risk of shoulder disorder: adjusted ORs 2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 4.1) and 2.5 (1.2 to 5.2), respectively. Exposure to several physical factors increased the risk further, the adjusted OR was nearly 4 for at least three exposures. The adverse effects of physical work were seen even among those older than 75 years at follow-up. The statistically significant risk factors differed between genders: for men vibration and repetitive movements, and for women lifting heavy loads and working in awkward postures. Age and body mass index modified the effects of the physical exposures. The results remained similar after excluding those with any shoulder pain at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study in a general population showing that occupational physical loading increases the risk of a subsequent clinical shoulder disorder and the effects seem to be long-term. Early preventive measures at the workplace may have long-lasting health benefits for the shoulder.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/psychology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Chronic Disease , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Shoulder Pain/physiopathology , Shoulder Pain/rehabilitation
7.
Ergonomics ; 50(12): 2082-94, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17852375

ABSTRACT

To combine estimates of trunk posture and force into an integrated measure of load on the low back, continuous variables for body angles were estimated by assuming specified distributions within corresponding posture categories with Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation. The estimated posture angles were compared with reference measurements from the Lumbar Motion Monitor and inclinometers. The lumbar compression estimates, generated from simulated posture angles and from direct measurement, were compared. Trunk flexion showed high correlation between direct measurements and simulated angles, as did L5/S1 compression. The MC approach to extracting continuous posture angles from categorized observations did not appear to introduce large error in the variables used to estimate spinal compressive forces. When instrumentation methods of postural assessment are not feasible, a simulation approach combined with biomechanical modelling could be used to integrate multiple external exposure variables into estimates of compressive forces acting on the low back.


Subject(s)
Lumbosacral Region , Posture/physiology , Spinal Cord Compression , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Movement/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , United States , Videotape Recording , Weight-Bearing/physiology
8.
Occup Environ Med ; 64(5): 325-33, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17182643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the risk of work injury by socioeconomic status (SES) in hospital workers, and to assess whether SES gradient in injury risk is explained by differences in psychosocial, ergonomic or organisational factors at work. METHODS: Workforce rosters and Occupational Safety and Health Administration injury logs for a 5-year period were obtained from two hospitals in Massachusetts. Job titles were classified into five SES strata on the basis of educational requirements and responsibilities: administrators, professionals, semiprofessionals, skilled and semiskilled workers. 13 selected psychosocial, ergonomic and organisational exposures were assigned to the hospital jobs through the national O*NET database. Rates of injury were analysed as frequency records using the Poisson regression, with job title as the unit of analysis. The risk of injury was modelled using SES alone, each exposure variable alone and then each exposure variable in combination with SES. RESULTS: An overall annual injury rate of 7.2 per 100 full-time workers was estimated for the two hospitals combined. All SES strata except professionals showed a significant excess risk of injury compared with the highest SES category (administrators); the risk was highest among semiskilled workers (RR 5.3, p<0.001), followed by nurses (RR 3.7, p<0.001), semiprofessionals (RR 2.9, p = 0.006) and skilled workers (RR 2.6, p = 0.01). The risk of injury was significantly associated with each exposure considered except pause frequency. When workplace exposures were introduced in the regression model together with SES, four remained significant predictors of the risk of injury (decision latitude, supervisor support, force exertion and temperature extremes), whereas the RR related to SES was strongly reduced in all strata, except professionals. CONCLUSIONS: A strong gradient in the risk of injury by SES was reported in a sample population of hospital workers, which was greatly attenuated by adjusting for psychosocial and ergonomic workplace exposures, indicating that a large proportion of that gradient can be explained by differences in working conditions.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Data Collection , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Educational Status , Employment , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Occup Environ Med ; 63(6): 369-70, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16714256
10.
Ergonomics ; 48(1): 66-77, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15764307

ABSTRACT

Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDs) comprise a large proportion of work-related illnesses in the USA. Physical risk factors including manual force and segmental vibration have been associated with UEMSDs. Reduced sensitivity to vibration in the fingertips (a function of nerve integrity) has been found in those exposed to segmental vibration, to hand force, and in office workers. The objective of this study was to determine whether an association exists between digital vibration thresholds (VTs) and exposure to ergonomic stressors in automobile manufacturing. Interviews and physical examinations were conducted in a cross-sectional survey of workers (n = 1174). In multivariable robust regression modelling, associations with workers' estimates of ergonomic stressors stratified on tool use were determined. VTs were separately associated with hand force, vibration as felt through the floor (whole body vibration), and with an index of multiple exposures in both tool users and non-tool users. Additional associations with contact stress and awkward upper extremity postures were found in tool users. Segmental vibration was not associated with VTs. Further epidemiologic and laboratory studies are needed to confirm the associations found. The association with self-reported whole body vibration exposure suggests a possible sympathetic nervous system effect, which remains to be explored.


Subject(s)
Automobiles , Ergonomics , Fingers , Stress, Physiological/etiology , Vibration , Adult , Age Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Industry , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Sex Factors
12.
Occup Environ Med ; 61(8): 668-74, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15258272

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To estimate the one year cumulative incidence and persistence of upper extremity (UE) soft tissue disorders, in a fixed cohort of automotive manufacturing workers, and to quantify their associations with ergonomic exposures. METHODS: At baseline and at follow up, cases of UE musculoskeletal disorders were determined by interviewer administered questionnaire and standardised physical examination of the upper extremities. The interview obtained new data on psychosocial strain and updated the medical and work histories. An index of exposure to ergonomic stressors, obtained at baseline interview, was the primary independent variable. Cumulative incidence and persistence of UE disorders (defined both by symptoms and by physical examination plus symptoms) were analysed in relation to baseline ergonomic exposures, adjusting for other covariates. The incidence of new disorders was modelled using multivariate proportional hazards regression among workers who were not cases in the first year and the prevalence on both occasions was modelled by repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: A total of 820 workers (69% of eligible cohort members) was examined. Follow up varied slightly by department group but not by baseline exposure level or other characteristics. Among the non-cases at baseline, the cumulative incidence of UE disorders was 14% by symptoms and 12% by symptoms plus examination findings. These rates increased with index of physical exposures primarily among subjects who had the same jobs at follow up as at baseline. Increased exposure during follow up increased risk of incidence. The persistence of UE disorders from baseline to follow up examination was nearly 60% and somewhat associated with baseline exposure score. CONCLUSIONS: These longitudinal results confirm the previous cross sectional associations of UE musculoskeletal disorders with exposure to combined ergonomic stressors. The exposure-response relation was similar for incident cases defined by symptoms alone and those confirmed by physical examination.


Subject(s)
Automobiles , Ergonomics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Adult , Aged , Arm , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Psychophysics , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Stress, Psychological/psychology
13.
Ergonomics ; 44(7): 696-718, 2001 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11437204

ABSTRACT

There is increasing interest in distinguishing the effects of physical and psychosocial workplace stressors on the aetiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). Modest associations have been found between psychosocial stressors and MSD, such as intensive load, monotonous work and low job control. Interpretation of these results has been limited by likely covariation between physical and psychosocial stressors. This investigation examined exposure covariation among blue- and white-collar workers employed in a mass production manufacturing environment (N = 410). Physical stressors were assessed from questionnaire and accelerometry. Psychosocial stressors were assessed from questionnaire. Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were computed. An exploratory factor analysis procedure identified possible common factors linking specific physical and psychosocial stressors. Moderate to high correlations between some physical and psychosocial stressors showed evidence of covariation both across and within groups. Covariation was strongest among blue-collar production and low-status office workers. Factor analysis results showed considerable shared variance between some physical and psychosocial stressors, such as repetition and job control, suggesting that these disparate stressors manifest from common work organization factors that govern the structure of work. While recognizing the conceptual differences between physical and psychosocial stressors, these results call attention to the strong empirical relationships that can exist between some stressors in the workplace setting. To guard against ambiguous study findings that can occur when exposures are mixed, it is critical that future epidemiologic studies include information about the degree of association between task-level stressors. Future research on work organization determinants of task-level stressors, and their coincident occurrence in jobs with greater specialization, may provide promising new insights into the nature of risk for MSD and effective prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Stress, Physiological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Task Performance and Analysis , Adult , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Occupations , Statistics, Nonparametric , United States/epidemiology
14.
Appl Ergon ; 32(3): 215-24, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11394462

ABSTRACT

While observing six simulated construction tasks in the field, trained analysts recorded arm, trunk and leg postures categorically with two fixed-interval observational protocols. Observations were compared to measurements obtained with an electronic postural assessment system coupled with video analysis. The electronic postural assessment system consisted of electronic inclinometers to measure upper arm posture, knee flexion and trunk flexion, coveralls to house the inclinometer wiring, and an eletrogoniometric system to measure trunk lateral bending and twisting. Video analysis included frozen-frame analysis that corresponded to the moment of observation and simulated real-time analysis. Measurements were made on five male participants who each performed three tasks representative of construction laborers' work. Agreement among the observational and reference methods was generally high, although significant differences in measured frequency of exposure existed for knee flexion, trunk lateral bending and trunk twisting. The results suggest that, under appropriate conditions, discrete observations can be used to obtain reasonably accurate estimates of exposure frequency for broad categories of certain body postures.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Observation , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Posture , Task Performance and Analysis , Humans , Leg/physiology , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Shoulder/physiology , Thorax/physiology , Videotape Recording
15.
Occup Environ Med ; 58(3): 194-9, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11171933

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The drop out rates in different longitudinal studies of musculoskeletal disorders range between 7% and 57%, and little is known about the characteristics of the subjects who dropped out. The aim was to analyse various consequences of drop out in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors during 1969-97. METHOD: Data about occupational conditions and health in 1969 and in 1993 were analysed. Differences between those who participated throughout (participants) and drop out subjects in these analyses formed the basis for recalculations of earlier reported analyses of associations between occupational conditions and low back pain. In the recalculation the data were weighted to compensate for the differences. RESULTS: More female and male drop out subjects than participants in 1993 had monotonous work, fewer women and more male drop out subjects had heavy lifting in 1969. In 1997, more female and male drop out subjects had had heavy lifting and low stimulation at work in 1993. At both occasions, there were differences between the drop out subjects and participants in occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. The weighted analyses resulted in changes in risk ratio of 0.1-0.2. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in occupational conditions and health among participants and drop out subjects in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors during 1969-97 did not markedly influence the risk ratios.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Data Collection/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sweden/epidemiology
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 39(1): 58-71, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11148016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This surveillance study was undertaken to target efforts to prevent work-related carpal tunnel syndrome (WR-CTS) and to assess physician case-reports as a source of surveillance data. METHODS: Physician case-reports and workers' compensation disability claims were used to document patterns of WR-CTS in Massachusetts from March 1992 to June 1997 by age, gender, industry, occupation, and calendar year. Characteristics of cases identified through the two data sources were compared. RESULTS: 4,836 cases of WR-CTS were ascertained; 6% were identified by both data sources. Whereas the two sets of cases were similar with respect to age and occupation categories, physician-reported cases were more likely male and employed in manufacturing. The number of compensation claims filed by women declined over time, and a substantial number of cases under age 25 years were identified. Manufacturing workers had the highest rates; the highest numbers of cases were employed in hospitals, grocery stores, and the insurance industry. Several technical/administrative support occupations likely to use video display terminals had both high rates and frequencies. CONCLUSION: WR-CTS is a significant public health problem. Physician reports are useful in understanding problem magnitude and targeting specific establishments for intervention but are currently of limited use in targeting specific industries and occupations.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Administrative Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/prevention & control , Computer Terminals/statistics & numerical data , Disease Notification , Female , Food Industry/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Industry/classification , Insurance/statistics & numerical data , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Population Surveillance , Public Health , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data
17.
Am J Ind Med ; 38(5): 516-28, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11025493

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 1969 a population-based study was conducted in the Stockholm region. From the 2,579 randomly selected participants (18-65 years of age in 1969), the youngest subset were asked to participate in a reexamination in 1993. Information regarding working conditions, conditions outside work, and neck and shoulder disorders was collected retrospectively for the period 1970-1993. METHODS: Of 783 eligible subjects (42-59 years of age in 1993), 484 responded. Cases of neck/shoulder disorders were defined by past sick leave or medical attention or recent symptoms, depending on available information. For each case (n = 271) two controls were randomly selected, matched by age and gender. Variables regarding both physical and psychosocial conditions were included in the matched analyses. RESULTS: Among women mainly psychosocial factors and among men mainly physical factors were associated with neck/shoulder disorders. The only gender common risk indicator found was repetitive hand work (OR approximately 1.5). Interactive effects were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The impact on neck/shoulder disorders from separate factors was moderate but combinations of physical and psychosocial factors, as well as of work-related and non-work-related factors, produced relative risks above 2.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Neck , Shoulder , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Fingers , Hand , Humans , Leisure Activities , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Sweden/epidemiology , Time Factors , Workplace
19.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 26(4): 283-91, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10994793

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A case-referent study was conducted in an automobile assembly plant to evaluate the risk of shoulder disorders associated with nonneutral postures. METHODS: The cases were workers who reported shoulder pain to the plant clinic during a 10-month period and met symptom criteria (pain frequency or duration in the past year) in an interview; more than one-half also had positive findings in a physical examination. The referents were randomly selected workers who were free of shoulder disorders according to the clinic records, the interview, and the physical examination. For each of the 79 cases and 124 referents, 1 job was analyzed for postural and biomechanical demands by an analyst blinded to the case-referent status. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the subjects flexed or abducted the right arm "severely" (above 90 degrees) during the job cycle, and 35% did so with the left arm. The peak torques at the shoulder were rather low. Shoulder disorders were associated with severe flexion or abduction of the left [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5-6.5] and the right (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.8) shoulder. The risk increased as the proportion of the work cycle exposed increased. The relationships were similar for the cases with and without physical findings. Use of hand-held tools increased the risk and also modified the association with postural stress, although the joint exposure distributions limited full analysis of this finding. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the conclusion that severe shoulder flexion or abduction, especially for 10% or more of the work cycle, is predictive of chronic or recurrent shoulder disorders.


Subject(s)
Automobiles , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Posture , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Case-Control Studies , Ergonomics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Job Description , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/economics , Risk Factors
20.
Am J Ind Med ; 37(6): 645-55, 2000 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10797508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For a study of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders among automobile manufacturing workers, an ergonomic exposure index was constructed by summing ten psychophysical (interview) items. Here we explore the sensitivity of the exposure-response relationship to the formulation of that index. METHODS: Five alternative exposure indices were constructed: three a priori weighting schemes and two sets of weights derived from multivariate regression coefficients. In addition, structural equation modeling was performed with LISREL. RESULTS: The original index and a priori weighting schemes had similar associations with upper extremity disorders, adjusted for nonoccupational covariates. A reasonable model fit was achieved in LISREL after two modifications; the standardized solution showed that nonneutral postures were significantly related to upper extremity signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In this large population, with adequate range of exposures, the exposure-response relationship appeared generally robust to the mathematical formulation of the exposure index. Among the available exposure variables, postural strain had the strongest association.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/etiology , Automobiles , Ergonomics , Industry , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Adult , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychophysics , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...