Age-related Variations in Patterns of Patent Foramen Ovale-Stroke versus Other Cryptogenic Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)-stroke, a form of cryptogenic stroke, has certain identifying clinical and imaging features. However, data describing this stroke type remains inconsistent. This study examined the potential variations in PFO-stroke features, depending on age. METHODS: From a hospital registry, cryptogenic stroke patients were retrospectively selected, and PFO-strokes identified by the presence of >10 microembolic signals (MES) on transcranial doppler (TCD) saline agitation test. Cryptogenic strokes were grouped according to age (<70 as young, >70 as elderly). Clinical and imaging variables of PFO-strokes and non-PFO strokes were compared, with and without age considered. RESULTS: Of the 462 cryptogenic patients, 30.5% (141/462) were PFO-strokes, while majority (321/462) had no PFO. When cryptogenic strokes were analyzed by age, the significant difference was noted in the lesion number, pattern, and side. A single (72.8% vs 57.9%, p=0.020) and a small single lesion (51.1% vs 35.5%, p=0.039) were frequently seen in the younger PFO-strokes than the non-PFO counterpart, while mixed territory lesions identified the elderly PFO-strokes (30.6% vs 8.9%, p=0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of PFO-strokes further showed that age was independently associated with lesion side (OR 1.12 (1.05-1.20), p<0.001) and lesion number (OR 1.06 (1.02-1.10), p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating age-specific imaging criteria in the identification of PFO-strokes may be of additional value. Further, PFO may remain contributory to the stroke risk in the elderly, in association with vascular risk factors.

Presence of Embolic Source and Outcome in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

OBJECTIVES: The etiology of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is unclear in approximately 50% of patients, suggesting pathomechanical heterogeneity; moreover, little is known about outcomes according to etiology. This study investigated whether the presence of an embolic source affects outcome in CRAO. METHODS: CRAO patients within 7 days of symptom onset were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical parameters, including initial and 1-month visual acuity, CRAO subtype, and brain images, were reviewed. CRAO etiology was categorized as CRAO with or without an embolic source (CRAO-E+ and CRAO-E-). Visual improvement was defined as a decrease in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution ≥0.3 at 1 month. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients with CRAO were included. Visual improvement was noted in 40.4% of patients. Embolic sources were identified in 55.3% of patients, and visual improvement group rather than no improvement group was more commonly associated with the presence of an embolic source. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, CRAO-E+ independently predicted visual improvement (odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.15-7.81, p = 0.025). DISCUSSION: CRAO-E+ was found to be associated with a better outcome. CRAO-E+ may be more prone to recanalization than that CRAO-E-.