The role of screening electrocardiograms in the evaluation of ROTC cadets applying for flight status.

The majority of sudden, nontraumatic deaths in young, otherwise healthy individuals result from an unknown underlying cardiac abnormality. The low sensitivity of the traditional history and physical exam in detecting these anomalies has led to a debate regarding the use of routine screening electrocardiograms (ECGs) in young adults. The present study screened 1,099 ROTC cadets applying for aviator status during the summers of 2005 and 2006. Seven candidates (0.6%) were disqualified because of ECG abnormalities, including two with Wolf Parkinson White syndrome. None of the individuals were identified by history and physical exam. ECG was an effective screening tool for detecting silent abnormalities with potential for arrhythmia in our population of healthy young adults. Other ECG findings indicative of anatomic abnormalities were not found. ECG screening can be a valuable tool and should be used in evaluating certain subsets of the population.

Training physicians for combat casualty care on the modern battlefield.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma training among nonsurgical physicians in the military is highly variable in amount and quality. However, all deployed military physicians, regardless of specialty, are expected to provide combat casualty care. The goal was to assess the effectiveness of an intense modular trauma refresher course for nonsurgical physicians deploying to a combat zone. METHODS: All graduating nonsurgical residents participated in this 2.5-day course, consisting of 4 modules: (1) didactic session; (2) simulation with interactive human surgical simulators; (3) case presentations and triage scenarios from Iraq/Afghanistan with associated skill stations; and (4) live tissue surgical procedure laboratory. Competency tests, surveys, and after action comments were reviewed and compared before and after course completion. RESULTS: Between May 2005 and April 2007, 60 physicians participated in the course. By specialties, there were 32 internists, 16 pediatricians, 7 general practitioners, 4 obstetricians/gynecologists, and 1 "other" nonsurgical physician represented. Precourse and postcourse tests were administered to 31 of 60 participants. The mean test scores improved from 76% to 96% upon completion of the course (p < 0.01). Additionally, self-perceived confidence levels in handling battlefield casualties from questionnaires based on Likert scale responses (1 = not confident, 5 = confident) improved from an average of 2.3 before the course to 3.9 upon completion of the course (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: All military physicians must be prepared to manage combat casualties. This hybrid training model may be an effective method to prepare nonsurgeons to deal with battle injuries. This course significantly improved the knowledge and confidence among primary care physicians.