Heterozygosity assessment of five STR loci located at 5q13 region for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been considered as an alternative to prenatal diagnosis for prevention of genetic disorders while avoiding the subsequent termination of pregnancy. However, the limited amount of template DNA available in a single diploid cell used for PGD leads to number of problems including an increased incidence of detectable contamination; amplification failure and allele drop out. Due to their highly polymorphic and amplifiable characteristics, short tandem repeat (STR) analysis has been proposed as a mean to overcome these limitations. Heterozygosity of the applied STRs is of paramount importance in their informativity, and should therefore be studied in any certain population. Here, for the first time, we report on the heterozygosity analysis of five STR markers (D5S1408, D5S1417, D5S610, D5S629 and D5S637) flanking to SMA gene region, to examine their applicability in the PGD for SMA disease. We have also investigated other statistical features of these markers and found that all of the five studied STRs were informative and four meet the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the studied population. Furthermore, our results propose that similar approaches can be used for the PGD of other single gene disorders.

"Familial" versus "Sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of common microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been investigated. As the balanced chromosomal abnormalities commonly lead to the recurrent ID or multiple congenital anomalies, this study was designed to evaluate whether it was justified to investigate such aberrations in familial ID patients. Three hundred and twenty eight patients from 101 unrelated Iranian families with more than two ID patients in the first-degree relatives, have been investigated. Assessment of a panel of 21 common Microdeletion and Microduplication syndromes (CMMS) was carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique. RESULTS: Among the families studied, 27.7% had 4-12, 35.6% had 3 and 36.6% had 2 affected individuals in the first-degree relatives. An autosomal dominant inheritance of Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) was detected in a family with no clinical suspicion of WBS. The prevalence of CMMS was therefore,0.99%. CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation of a panel of CMMS in a large sample set of "familial ID patients". The findings of this study showed the low prevalence of CMMSs in "familial ID" patients in spite of the significant contribution of such aberrations in "sporadic ID" which has a very useful practical impact by avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests in "familial ID" patients.

"Familial" versus "sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements.

BACKGROUND: Cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements have been proposed as a significant cause of sporadic intellectual disability (ID) but the role of such aberrations in familial ID has not yet been studied. As positive family history of ID had been proposed as an important and significant predicting factor of subtelomeric rearrangements, it was assumed that the contribution of subtelomeric aberrations in familial ID would be much more than the sporadic ones. Three hundred and twenty two patients from 102 unrelated families with more than two ID patients in the first degree relatives have been investigated. Assessment of subtelomeric rearrangements were carried out using Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique. Detected aberrations were then confirmed by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) method. RESULTS: Among the families studied, 27.4% had 4-12, 36.3% had 3 and 36.3% had 2 affected individuals in the first degree relatives. One unbalanced translocation and 4 polymorphic changes were detected. The prevalence of clinically significant subtelomeric rearrangements was 0.98%. CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation of subtelomeric aberrations in a large sample set of familial ID patients. Our results show that the contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements to familial ID is not as much as what had been determined for sporadic ones in the literature. Moreover, this study shows that the positive family history by alone, cannot be the most important and determining indicator of subtelomeric aberrations while it would be a good predicting factor when associated with dysmorphism or congenital malformations. These findings propose that other cryptic chromosomal abnormalities or even single gene disorders may be the main cause of familial ID rather than subtelomeric aberrations.