Epidemiological assessment of hypospadias by degree of severity.

PURPOSE: Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital malformations, with reportedly increasing rates of prevalence but poorly defined etiological factors for the disease and the varying degrees of manifestation. We characterize the prevalence of hypospadias in Arkansas with consideration of the degree of hypospadias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Arkansas State Birth Defects Surveillance Program of the Arkansas Reproductive Health Monitoring System were used to identify hypospadias cases and all male births by women residing in Arkansas between 1998 and 2007. Categorization of hypospadias severity into first, second or third degree was determined by a common 6-digit birth defect coding system used by surveillance programs across the country. Prevalence rates were computed for maternal and infant characteristics, birth year and birth residence. RESULTS: The prevalence of hypospadias in Arkansas for births between 1998 and 2007 was 74.2 cases per 10,000 live births. Degrees of hypospadias were graded as first (coronal/distal) in 60.7% of cases, second (mid penile/subcoronal) in 18.8%, third (perineal/proximal penile) in 4.6% and hypospadias not otherwise specified in 16%. The prevalence of hypospadias increased during the surveillance period, with 66.9 per 10,000 live births between 1998 and 2002, and 81.0 per 10,000 live births between 2003 and 2007 (p = 0.0003). While the prevalence rates for every degree of hypospadias also increased, the prevalence of hypospadias not otherwise specified decreased from 14.8 to 9.0 during these periods. CONCLUSIONS: Hypospadias prevalence in Arkansas is increasing. Improvement in recognition and categorization of degrees of hypospadias may have an impact on the reported prevalence rates.

Alternative approaches to expanding pediatric urology services and productivity.

PURPOSE: We critically assessed the outcomes of a new model of pediatric urology delivery using alternative approaches to expand care without increasing the number of pediatric urologists. The approaches included the use of advanced practice nurse practitioners, pediatric physician specialists, part-time contract pediatric urologists from neighboring institutions and part-time contract adult urologists from our university. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the Division of Pediatric Urology at Arkansas Children's Hospital during 2009 and 2010. The only pediatric urologist at our institution retired in December 2009 with an immediate transition to a new pediatric urologist in January 2010. Comparisons were made in the numbers of clinic visits, inpatient admissions/consultations, surgical volume and patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Average clinic monthly visits in 2009 and 2010 were 153 and 271, respectively (p <0.0001). Inpatient admissions increased from 43 in 2009 to 162 in 2010. Inpatient initial consultations and followup consultations increased by 115 and 112, respectively, from 2009 to 2010. Surgical volume increased 26.7% in 2010 (p = 0.0832) and Press Ganey® scores were comparable or improved from 2009 to 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The use of advance practice nurse practitioners, part-time contract adult and pediatric urologists, and pediatric physician specialists can effectively increase the number of patients treated without adding full-time pediatric urology staff. The assignment of patient and disease populations to each team member has been an ongoing process of critically defining and updating responsibilities in an attempt to expand care, increase productivity and maximize the quality of delivery of these services.

Results: Survey of pediatric urology electronic medical records-use and perspectives.

PURPOSE: The $19.2 billion Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act will have a dramatic effect on the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States by directly reimbursing for the adoption of electronic medical records in the future. We sought to gain an understanding of electronic medical record use in pediatric urology to aid in the transition to electronic medical records. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All Fellows and post-fellowship Fellow Candidates of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology were recruited to participate in the survey. Electronic and paper versions of this 50-question internal review board approved anonymous survey were sent to potential participants. RESULTS: Of 286 pediatric urologists 165 completed the survey for a 65% response rate. Of the respondents 67.3% were pediatric urologists in academic or hospital based practice while the remaining 32.7% were in private practice. Overall 78.8% of respondents reported using electronic medical records at the hospital while 67.3% used them at the office/clinic. Of the physicians 12.1% reported that they would retire if electronic medical record use was federally mandated. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric urologists in the United States appear to have embraced the adoption of electronic medical records. A large number of academic/hospital based and private practice pediatric urologists have begun to use electronic medical records. Most respondents were interested in improving electronic medical record use in our field, believed that physicians would be most capable of developing ideal electronic medical records and would be interested in participating in a national cooperative effort to improve electronic medical record use.