Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Agric Saf Health ; 21(2): 105-12, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26204786

ABSTRACT

Tractor overturns continue to be the leading cause of death on U.S. farms. While rollover protective structures (ROPS) are effective in preventing these fatalities, they are underutilized due to a number of barriers. Past programs in the U.S. and abroad have targeted this area of agricultural safety; however, a national program is not yet in place for U.S. farmers. This study seeks to build a national partnership to address tractor overturn fatalities by increasing the number of tractors with ROPS. A diverse, multisector steering committee has been organized and is working together using Whole System in a Room methods. This method brings together partners from nine stakeholder groups to identify and commit to a collaborative solution to the issue.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Agriculture/instrumentation , Equipment Safety , Safety , Equipment Safety/standards , Motor Vehicles , Safety/standards , United States
2.
J Agric Saf Health ; 19(2): 115-24, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23923731

ABSTRACT

In 2006, a social marketing campaign was developed to increase the installation of rollover protective structures (ROPS) on unprotected New York tractors. Using data gathered from the program's hotline, the impact of price increases on farmers' interest in ROPS is examined. Pricing data were obtained for all rigid ROPS kits commercially available in the U.S. since 2006. These data were stratified into two groups of ROPS suppliers: (1) tractor manufacturers that sell ROPS for their own tractors, referred to in this study as original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and (2) aftermarket (AM) ROPS suppliers. The trend in price increases was contrasted with the change in the consumer price index (CPI), the probability of retrofitting within quintiles of cost was estimated, and the increase in ROPS prices over time was plotted The average price increase for a ROPS kit (excluding shipping and installation) over the six years of the study was 23.3% for OEM versus 60.5% for AM (p < 0.0001). Out-of-pocket expenses held steady for OEM versus a six-year increase of $203 for AM (p = 0.098). The probability of a farmer retrofitting dropped monotonically from 66.9% in the lowest ROPS cost quintile to 23% in the highest. If these trends continue, the proportion of inquiries resulting in a ROPS retrofit will fall below 20% by 2020 for AM ROPS. Based on other trends identified in the literature, it is reasonable to assume that decreases in ROPS installation are likely to affect the tractor owners who are most likely to need these safety devices.


Subject(s)
Accident Prevention/economics , Accident Prevention/instrumentation , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/instrumentation , Motor Vehicles , Costs and Cost Analysis , Equipment Safety , Humans , New York , Occupational Health
3.
J Agric Saf Health ; 18(2): 129-40, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22655522

ABSTRACT

Many used tractors that are imported from Japan are adding to the current national inventory in the U.S. and Canada of farm tractors that lack a rollover protective structure (ROPS). Gray-market tractors are built for use by the manufacturer for a certain country but are imported against the manufacture's wishes to a second country for use there, usually as a used tractor. Gray-market tractors may lack ROPS and seatbelts, depending on the date of manufacturer. The objective of this investigation is to describe the gray market for tractors imported from Japan into the U.S. and the policy implications regarding the hazards associated with these imports. Operator manuals and warning labels are typically not written in English. Foreign manufacturers that market tractors in the U.S. have established a variety of disincentives for the importation of gray-market tractors, including issuing warnings, not servicing or providing parts for these tractors, and banning their importation through actions by the U.S. International Trade Commission. Nonetheless, a U.S. market has developed that imports and provides services and parts for gray-market tractors, and some companies provide certified ROPS on the tractors that they sell. A product safety perspective and related policies are presented as an approach to ensuring that these imports are equipped with ROPS and seatbelts.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/instrumentation , Commerce , Off-Road Motor Vehicles/standards , Protective Devices/standards , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Design/methods , Equipment Design/standards , Equipment Safety/methods , Equipment Safety/standards , Japan , Public Policy , Seat Belts , Taxes , United States
4.
J Agric Saf Health ; 14(1): 105-17, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18376539

ABSTRACT

Tractor rollovers continue to be one of the most frequent causes of agricultural fatalities. Despite knowledge of rollovers and the efficacy of rollover protective structures (ROPS), few New York farmers have considered installing ROPS on their unprotected tractors. Qualitative interviews conducted with an "at-risk" segment of the New York farming community indicate that there are a number of barriers to safety in general and to retrofitting, in particular. The following themes and categories emerged in relation to safety and risk taking: constant exposures to risk with positive outcomes normalizes risk; the modeling of risk by significant others positions risk as part of a farming identity; and the pressure to reduce costs, save time, and accept risk frames risk-taking as the cost-effective option (especially in regard to retrofitting, which farmers believe is both expensive and time-consuming). Recommendations for researchers planning retrofitting interventions would be to focus safety messages on the risk to significant others or on the financial impact of rollovers, and to provide financial incentives and assistance to farmers considering retrofitting.


Subject(s)
Accident Prevention/methods , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Agriculture , Off-Road Motor Vehicles/standards , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control , Accidents, Occupational/mortality , Adult , Aged , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York , Protective Devices , Seat Belts
5.
J Agric Saf Health ; 13(1): 25-32, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17370911

ABSTRACT

The goal of the "Safety Training for Employers and Supervisors of Adolescent Farmworkers" initiative is to improve the occupational health and safety knowledge and practices of agricultural employers and supervisors responsible for employees, ages 14 to 17 years. Surveys were sent to members of the National Council of Agricultural Employers and the Washington Growers League to measure attitudes regarding adolescent employees, current hiring and training practices, and future intentions. More than half of the respondents hire adolescents. Two-thirds were male, nearly three-quarters of the respondents had college or post-graduate degrees, and more than half were 50 years or older. The majority of respondents had positive perceptions of adolescents in terms of dependability, helpfulness, and work ethic. Among those who currently hire young workers, the most common reasons were to provide a job for children of friends and family and because they can work part-time to fill a labor demand. Among those not hiring adolescents, the most common reason was concern about child labor regulations and associated tasks (e.g., paperwork, monitoring hours). Respondents use a variety of safety training resources, especially posters and safety meetings. For the future, they expect to need more handout materials and training videos. Study results provide insights into barriers to the employment of young workers and suggest methods by which agricultural safety specialists can best assist those employers and producers who are willing to hire adolescents into agricultural work settings.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Occupational Health , Personnel Management/methods , Personnel Selection , Adolescent , Data Collection , Employment , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
WMJ ; 99(9): 51-5, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11220197

ABSTRACT

Farming is one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States. Unfortunately, risk of injury and death extends not only to adults, but to children that live, play, and work on the farm. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis and prevention of farm injury in children and adolescents. In Wisconsin 39 children were killed in the agricultural setting between 1995 and 1999. Nationwide, over 100 children per year are killed and 27,000 injured on farms. The age distribution of injury in children is bimodal, with one peak at 3-4 years of age and a second peak at 13-16 years. Boys are much more likely to be injured on the farm than girls. Of the agents associated with the injury of children, tractors are most commonly implicated and are the most deadly. Drownings, injury by cows and horses, and other farm implements and machinery make up the remainder of most farm accidents. The head and face are the sites involved in preschoolers whereas the limbs are more likely to be injured in older children. Poor supervision, unreasonable expectations, financial difficulties and lack of safety devices are associated with risk of injury. Prevention or injury involves patient and family education, regulation and safety devices. Important resources are available for farm families and health care providers to prevent farm accidents in children.


Subject(s)
Agriculture , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Child , Humans , Rural Population , Wisconsin/epidemiology
8.
Work ; 2(1): 47-53, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24441840
9.
Am J Ind Med ; 18(2): 179-92, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2206049

ABSTRACT

Agricultural work injury data are less available than data for other industries, so an overview of existing data is provided. Agriculture has the highest annual work death rate of all industries, 52 per 100,000 workers, which is five times the combined rate for all industries. Tractor-related injuries are the leading types of fatal injuries; injuries involving agricultural machinery, animals, and trucks are the leading types of non-fatal injuries. Victims of fatal accidents range in age from less than 1 year to over 90. Research needs are discussed, including the need for comprehensive surveillance.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational , Agriculture , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Humans , United States/epidemiology , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...