Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
J Reprod Med ; 60(3-4): 149-54, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25898478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the reference range of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) values in pregnancy. Near-infrared spectroscopy-derived StO2 is a noninvasive continuous measure used to predict hypoperfusion. Normal StO2 values have not been established in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled 154 healthy pregnant women from an obstetric and gynecology resident clinic. Three sequential measurements were taken after securing the StO2 probe to the thenar eminence of one hand. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences between trimesters and non-parametric methods to establish a reference range with 95% CI on the limits. RESULTS: The reference interval for the entire cohort of pregnant women is 73% (95% CI 72-75) to 92% (95% CI 89-93), similar to the normal range in the general population. We found no statistically significant difference in StO2 measurements between trimesters. Due to inadequate sample sizes we could not estimate a valid reference range for each trimester. CONCLUSION: We estimated a reference range for StO2 values in normal pregnant women. This information may contribute to the study of StO2 monitoring to predict impending shock in the obstetric patient.


Subject(s)
Oxygen/metabolism , Pregnancy/metabolism , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Oximetry , Reference Values , Young Adult
3.
J Crit Care ; 28(6): 1111.e1-5, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24011754

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Peripheral tissue oxygen saturation (Sto2) has shown promise as an early indicator of tissue hypoperfusion and as a risk stratification tool in various forms of shock. The purpose of this study was to determine if Sto2 would predict admission to an intensive (ICU) or progressive care unit in patients with early signs of sepsis. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, a rapid response team measured Sto2 levels in patients screening positive for sepsis. Using a logistic regression model, the value of Sto2 as a predictor for ICU admission within 72 hours of the initial assessment was determined. RESULTS: The 31 (47%) of 66 patients who required ICU admission within 72 hours of evaluation had a significantly lower Sto2 value (median, 78% vs 81%; P = .05). All patients with Sto2 less than 70% required ICU admission. A 1-point increase in Sto2 was associated with a 7% decrease in the odds of requiring ICU admission, and the area under the curve for Sto2 was 0.64 (0.51-0.77, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Low Sto2 levels in patients screening positive for sepsis are associated with an increased risk of ICU admission, but their reliability as a predictor is rather low. An Sto2 below 70% might be an interesting cutoff value for further study.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Oxygen/metabolism , Risk Assessment/methods , Sepsis/metabolism , Sepsis/physiopathology , Aged , Algorithms , Disease Progression , Female , Hospital Rapid Response Team , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies
4.
Am J Surg ; 201(3): 320-3; discussion 323, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21367371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Our institution initiated the implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines in 2006. We hypothesize that the addition of a surgical intensivist improved results more than the implementation of the guidelines alone. METHODS: We collected data on 273 patients who were admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for sepsis. The groups were divided into pre-bundle, n = 19; bundle, n = 186; and bundle-plus, n = 68, to denote the method by which the patients were treated for sepsis. RESULTS: There was no difference in age or sex between groups. There was a statistically significant decrease in length of stay (LOS) between the 3 groups, and in mortality between the bundle and bundle-plus treatment groups (P < .01). In addition, there was an average cost savings between each group. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of evidence-based guidelines decreased LOS and decreased cost in our surgical intensive care unit. By adding the expertise of a surgical intensivist, we reduced LOS, cost, and relative risk of death even further than using the guidelines alone.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/standards , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Sepsis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Care Costs , Humans , Leadership , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/trends , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/economics , Sepsis/mortality , Shock, Septic/therapy , Survival Analysis , Time Factors
5.
J Emerg Trauma Shock ; 3(2): 118-22, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20606786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69%). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; P < 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n = 19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1-3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25-31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63% in the elective group, 60% in the urgent group, and 54% in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16%, 17%, and 11%, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35%, 31%, and 11%. CONCLUSION: Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients.

6.
J Am Coll Surg ; 209(2): 198-205, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19632596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exsanguinating hemorrhage necessitating massive blood product transfusion is associated with high mortality rates. Recent data suggest that altering the fresh frozen plasma to packed red blood cell ratio (FFP:PRBC) results in significant mortality reductions. Our purpose was to evaluate mortality and blood product use in the context of a newly initiated massive transfusion protocol (MTP). STUDY DESIGN: In July 2005, our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center implemented an MTP supporting a 1:1.5 FFP:PRBC ratio, improved communications, and enhanced systems flow to optimize rapid blood product availability. During the 4 years surrounding protocol implementation, we reviewed data on trauma patients directly admitted through the emergency department and requiring 10 or more units PRBCs during the first 24 hours. RESULTS: For the 2 years before and subsequent to MTP initiation, there were 4,223 and 4,414 trauma activations, of which 40 and 37 patients, respectively, met study criteria. The FFP:PRBC ratios were identical, at 1:1.8 and 1:1.8 (p = 0.97). Despite no change in FFP:PRBC ratio, mortality decreased from 45% to 19% (p = 0.02). Other significant findings included decreased mean time to first product: cross-matched RBCs (115 to 71 minutes; p = 0.02), FFP (254 to 169 minutes; p = 0.04), and platelets (418 to 241 minutes; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MTP implementation is associated with mortality reductions that have been ascribed principally to increased plasma use and decreased FFP:PRBC ratios. Our study found a significant reduction in mortality despite unchanged FFP:PRBC ratios and equivalent overall mean numbers of transfusions. Our data underscore the importance of expeditious product availability and emphasize that massive transfusion is a complex process in which product ratio and time to transfusion represent only the beginning of understanding.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/mortality , Blood Transfusion/methods , Clinical Protocols , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hospital Mortality , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Plasma , Resuscitation/methods , Trauma Centers , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Trauma ; 66(3): 641-6; discussion 646-7, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19276732

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efforts to determine the suitability of low-grade pancreatic injuries for nonoperative management have been hindered by the inaccuracy of older computed tomography (CT) technology for detecting pancreatic injury (PI). This retrospective, multicenter American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored trial examined the sensitivity of newer 16- and 64-multidetector CT (MDCT) for detecting PI, and sensitivity/specificity for the identification of pancreatic ductal injury (PDI). METHODS: Patients who received a preoperative 16- or 64-MDCT followed by laparotomy with a documented PI were enrolled. Preoperative MDCT scans were classified as indicating the presence (+) or absence (-) of PI and PDI. Operative notes were reviewed and all patients were confirmed as PI (+), and then classified as PDI (+) or (-). As all patients had PI, an analysis of PI specificity was not possible. PI patients formed the pool for further PDI analysis. As sensitivity and specificity data were available for PDI, multivariate logistic regression was performed for PDI patients using the presence or absence of agreement between CT and operative note findings as an independent variable. Covariates were age, gender, Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, presence of oral contrast, presence of other abdominal injuries, performance of the scan as part of a dedicated pancreas protocol, and image thickness < or =3 mm or > or =5 mm. RESULTS: Twenty centers enrolled 206 PI patients, including 71 PDI (+) patients. Intravenous contrast was used in 203 studies; 69 studies used presence of oral contrast. Eight-nine percent were blunt mechanisms, and 96% were able to have their duct status operatively classified as PDI (+) or (-). The sensitivity of 16-MDCT for all PI was 60.1%, whereas 64-MDCT was 47.2%. For PDI, the sensitivities of 16- and 64-MDCT were 54.0% and 52.4%, respectively, with specificities of 94.8% for 16-MDCT scanners and 90.3% for 64-MDCT scanners. Logistic regression showed that no covariates were associated with an increased likelihood of detecting PDI for either 16- or 64-MDCT scanners. The area under the curve was 0.66 for the 16-MDCT PDI analysis and 0.77 for the 64-MDCT PDI analysis. CONCLUSION: Sixteen and 64-MDCT have low sensitivity for detecting PI and PDI, while exhibiting a high specificity for PDI. Their use as decision-making tools for the nonoperative management of PI are, therefore, limited.


Subject(s)
Pancreas/injuries , Tomography, Spiral Computed/instrumentation , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnostic imaging , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Injury Severity Score , Laparotomy , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatic Ducts/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Ducts/injuries , Pancreatic Ducts/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Wounds, Penetrating/surgery , Young Adult
8.
J Trauma ; 65(6): 1253-7, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19077609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Triage of the trauma patient in the field is a complex and challenging issue, especially deciding when to use aeromedical transport. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recently defined an acceptable under-triage rate [seriously injured patient not taken to a trauma center (TC)] as 5%, whereas over-triage rates may be as high as 25% to 50%. Effective utilization of prehospital helicopter transport requires both accurate assessment of patients and effective communication. The rural county adjacent to our developed trauma system uses standardized triage criteria to identify patients for direct transport to our TCs. We hypothesized these criteria accurately identify major trauma victims (MTV) and further that communication could be simplified to expedite transport. METHODS: Prehospital personnel use a MAP (mechanism, anatomy, and physiology) scoring system to triage trauma patients. Patients with > or = 2 "hits" are defined as MTV. In 2004, the triage policy was changed so that MTV would be transported directly to a TC without base hospital consultation (previously required). The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Medical Director reviewed cases transported to the TC to determine the appropriateness of triage decisions (over- and under-triage using the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma definitions). Data were compared before and after this policy change. RESULTS: For 2004 to 2006, we evaluated 676 air transports to TC and compared them to 468 in the prior 56 months. The overall transport rate increased slightly 7% to 10%. During the study period the over-triage rate was 31% compared with 21%, before the policy change. The MAP triage tool yielded a 93.8% sensitivity and a 99.5% specificity. Therefore, it determined the need for air-medical transport out of a rural environment into an established trauma system with > 90% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital personnel can accurately use a trauma triage tool to identify MTV. Eliminating base station contact, a potential for introducing communication error, did increase over-triage but still well within accepted limits. The system change also resulted in the transport of a greater proportion of minor trauma patients who later proved to have major injuries.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Trauma/classification , Trauma Severity Indices , Triage/classification , California , Health Services Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trauma Centers , Triage/statistics & numerical data
9.
Arch Surg ; 143(10): 935-9; discussion 939, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18936370

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Restrictive albumin use guidelines in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) will not increase mortality and will result in cost savings. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the SICU from July 1, 2004, through July 1, 2005, were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in the first 3 quarters of the study were treated with no restriction on albumin use. An organized educational program was initiated by the new intensivist-led critical care team and directed toward the residents, nursing staff, and primary surgical teams. Appropriate albumin use guidelines were instituted in the last quarter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prospective clinical and outcome data were collected. Albumin use data and costs were obtained from the pharmacy prospective database. RESULTS: A total of 1361 patients were included in the study. A statistically significant reduction in albumin use (54%) was found in the fourth quarter (P = .004), and a substantial cost saving was realized (56% reduction in cost) with the albumin use guidelines. Restrictive use of albumin had no negative impact on ICU mortality. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores on ICU day 1 were not different. No significant difference in mean ICU length of stay was noted. Maintained reduction in the use of albumin was documented during the next 6 quarters. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of albumin use guidelines during critical care resuscitation using an educational approach in a SICU is associated with reduced albumin use, significant cost savings, and no negative impact on ICU outcome. Continued educational efforts promoting evidence-based practices in the ICU are warranted.


Subject(s)
Albumins/economics , Albumins/therapeutic use , Cost Savings , Fluid Therapy/economics , Hospital Mortality/trends , APACHE , Cohort Studies , Critical Care/economics , Critical Care/methods , Female , Fluid Therapy/standards , Follow-Up Studies , General Surgery , Hospital Costs , Humans , Intensive Care Units/economics , Intensive Care Units/standards , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Probability , Prospective Studies , Resuscitation/economics , Resuscitation/methods , Risk Assessment
11.
Am J Surg ; 194(6): 758-63; discussion 763-4, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18005767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Trauma surgery has changed significantly over the past decade. Nonoperative evidence-based algorithms have become common and surgical trauma volume has become increasingly difficult to maintain. The acute care surgery (ACS) model, which integrates trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery, has been proposed as a future model of trauma practice. METHODS: Database information from an academic, county-based, trauma center was reviewed. A performance improvement surgical procedure database and level I trauma registry from 2005 were used to evaluate one center's ACS practice. RESULTS: There were 2,276 cases performed by 7 full-time and 5 part-time surgeons. Elective cases accounted for 64% (1,480) of caseload, emergency/urgent general surgery accounted for 32% (719) of cases, and emergency trauma surgeries accounted for 4% (96 procedures in 77 patients). In all, 23% were performed after hours. The ACS model supported controllable hours, adequate surgical volume, excellent patient care, and an appealing clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Surgical practice in a county-run trauma hospital can be similar to the ACS model, with positive results in terms of clinical volume and physician satisfaction. As clinical practices shift to the ACS model, there are lessons to be learned from currently existing, thriving, long-standing similar prototypes.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, County/organization & administration , Surgery Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Acute Disease , California , Emergency Treatment/standards , Emergency Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, County/standards , Hospitals, County/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Organizational , Registries , Surgery Department, Hospital/standards , Surgery Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/standards , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Traumatology/organization & administration , Traumatology/standards , Utilization Review , Workload/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...