Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 29(10): E154, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974668

ABSTRACT

An 86-year-old female patient was referred for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The heart team decided to perform transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A 25 mm transcatheter aortic valve was implanted, but the valve migrated low into the left ventricular outflow tract. The subsequent removal and replacement procedures are described.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Stenosis , Reoperation/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Echocardiography/methods , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Mitral Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Stenosis/etiology , Mitral Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Stenosis/surgery , Prosthesis Failure , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
3.
Am Heart J ; 147(4): 636-43, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15077078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 +/- 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P <.01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P =.01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P =.16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P =.65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P <.05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P <.05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 +/- 8.9 days vs 11.3 +/- 7; P =.10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone/therapeutic use , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & control , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Metoprolol/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Sotalol/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Premedication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...