Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurosurgery ; 87(2): 348-356, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31950187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current concussion symptom inventories emphasize total number or symptoms and severity and overlap with other conditions, such as mental health disorders, which may limit their specificity and clinical utility. OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the reliability and validity of a new Concussion Clinical Profiles Screening tool (CP Screen) in both healthy controls and concussed. METHODS: CP Screen is a 29-item self-report, clinical profile-based symptom inventory that measures the following 5 concussion clinical profiles: 1) anxiety/mood, 2) cognitive/fatigue, 3) migraine, 4) ocular, and 5) vestibular; and the following 2 modifying factors: 1) sleep and 2) neck. Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool, and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) were conducted. CP Screen was administered in community a concussion surveillance program and 2 sports medicine concussion clinics. Responses include 248 athletes, 121 concussed, and 127 controls, enrolled between 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the CP Screen in the control (Cronbach's alpha = .87) and concussed (Cronbach's alpha = .93) samples was high. Moderate to high correlations among the CP Screen factors and PCSS factors and VOMS items, supporting concurrent validity. ROC curve analysis for identifying concussed from controls was significant (P < .001) for all CP Screen factor and modifier scores with excellent AUCs for migraine (.93), ocular (.88), vestibular (.85), and cognitive (.81) factors, demonstrating predictive validity. CONCLUSION: The CP Screen demonstrated strong reliability, concurrent validity with commonly used concussion assessment (ie, PCSS, VOMS, and ImPACT), and predictive validity for identifying concussion. The CP Screen extends current symptom inventories by evaluating more specific symptoms that may reflect clinical profiles and inform better clinical care.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Athletes , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Am J Sports Med ; 44(6): 1400-6, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26980845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is a newly developed screening tool that evaluates vestibular and ocular motor symptom (eg, headache, dizziness, nausea, fogginess) provocation after a sport-related concussion. Baseline data on the VOMS are needed to extend the application of this measure to broad age groups and to document normal variations in performance. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the internal consistency of the VOMS in a large sample of healthy, nonconcussed collegiate athletes. The secondary purpose was to investigate the effects of patient sex and history of motion sickness, migraines, and concussions on baseline VOMS scores. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 263 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes (mean ± SD age, 19.85 ± 1.35 years) completed self-reported demographic and medical history at preseason physical examinations and baseline screening. Internal consistency of the VOMS was assessed with Cronbach α. A series of univariate nonparametric tests (χ(2) with odds ratios [ORs] and 95% CIs) were used to examine the associations among medical history risk factors and VOMS clinical cutoff scores (score of ≥2 for any individual VOMS symptom, near point of convergence [NPC] distance of ≥5 cm), with higher scores representing greater symptom provocation. RESULTS: Internal consistency of the VOMS was high (Cronbach α = .97), and 89% of athletes scored below cutoff levels (ie, 11% false-positive rate). Female athletes (OR, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.34-6.70]; P = .006) and those with a personal history of motion sickness (OR, 7.73 [95% CI, 1.94-30.75]; P = .009) were more likely to have ≥1 VOMS scores above cutoff levels. No risk factors were associated with increased odds of an abnormal NPC distance. CONCLUSION: The VOMS possesses internal consistency and an acceptable false-positive rate among healthy Division I collegiate student-athletes. Female sex and a history of motion sickness were risk factors for VOMS scores above clinical cutoff levels among healthy collegiate student-athletes. Results support a comprehensive baseline evaluation approach that includes an assessment of premorbid vestibular and oculomotor symptoms.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Motion Sickness/diagnosis , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Students , Transforming Growth Factor beta , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...