Atypical parkinsonism in C9orf72 expansions: a case report and systematic review of 45 cases from the literature.

While C9orf72 repeat expansions usually present with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), an increasing number of reports suggests that the primary phenotype of C9orf72 patients may also include movement disorders. We here provide the first systematic clinical characterisation of C9orf72-associated parkinsonism. We report a C9orf72 expansion carrier presenting with a clinical syndrome of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), pronounced mesencephalic atrophy on MRI and PSP-characteristic electrooculography findings. Moreover, we systematically review all previous reports on C9orf72 patients with parkinsonian features. Review of 28 reports revealed 45 C9orf72-positive patients with hypokinesia, rigidity and/or resting tremor. C9orf72-associated parkinsonism predominantly consisted in a hypokinetic-rigid syndrome without resting tremor (61%), with both asymmetric (59%) and symmetric (41%) distributions. Additional features included upper motor neuron signs (60%), lower motor neuron signs (36%), cognitive dysfunction (85%), behaviour and/or personality change (55%) and psychiatric symptoms (29%). Vertical supranuclear gaze palsy was reported in three further cases and cerebellar dysfunction in four cases. Family history frequently yielded evidence of ALS (31%) and FTD (21%). Atypical parkinsonism is a recurrent phenotypic manifestation of C9orf72 expansions. It occurs as part of a broad spectrum of C9orf72-related multi-system neurodegeneration, which can include basal ganglia, mesencephalic and cerebellar dysfunction. C9orf72 genotyping should be considered in those patients with atypical parkinsonism who present with a family history of ALS or FTD, upper or lower motor neuron signs and/or cognitive dysfunction with pronounced frontotemporal impairment.

Improved inter-observer agreement of an expert review panel in an oncology treatment trial--Insights from a structured interventional process.

PURPOSE: Oncologic imaging is a key for successful cancer treatment. While the quality assurance (QA) of image acquisition protocols has already been focussed, QA of reading and reporting offers still room for improvement. The latter was addressed in the context of a prospective multicentre trial on fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG)-positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: An expert panel was prospectively installed performing blinded reviews of mediastinal NSCLC involvement in FDG-PET/CT. Due to a high initial reporting inter-observer disagreement, the independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) triggered an interventional harmonisation process, which overall involved 11 experts uttering 6855 blinded diagnostic statements. After assessing the baseline inter-observer agreement (IOA) of a blinded re-review (phase 1), a discussion process led to improved reading criteria (phase 2). Those underwent a validation study (phase 3) and were then implemented into the study routine. After 2 months (phase 4) and 1 year (phase 5), the IOA was reassessed. RESULTS: The initial overall IOA was moderate (kappa 0.52 CT; 0.53 PET). After improvement of reading criteria, the kappa values improved substantially (kappa 0.61 CT; 0.66 PET), which was retained until the late reassessment (kappa 0.71 CT; 0.67 PET). Subjective uncertainty was highly predictive for low IOA. CONCLUSION: The IOA of an expert panel was significantly improved by a structured interventional harmonisation process which could be a model for future clinical trials. Furthermore, the low IOA in reporting nodal involvement in NSCLC may bear consequences for individual patient care.