Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dent Traumatol ; 27(2): 156-8, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21385316

ABSTRACT

With respect to its consequences, intrusive luxation is one of the most severe form of dental traumatic injuries in primary dentition. This case report presents crown and root deformation of a permanent incisor together with its delayed eruption which have resulted from a traumatic injury to its predecessor.


Subject(s)
Incisor/physiopathology , Tooth Avulsion/complications , Tooth, Deciduous/injuries , Tooth, Unerupted/etiology , Child , Dental Enamel Hypoplasia/etiology , Dental Pulp Cavity/abnormalities , Humans , Incisor/abnormalities , Male , Maxilla , Radiography, Bitewing , Tooth Crown/abnormalities , Tooth Root/abnormalities
2.
Dent Traumatol ; 26(1): 9-15, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089057

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the bond strengths of experimentally fractured human tooth fragments reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques in vitro. Uncomplicated crown fractures were obtained on intact human mandibular permanent incisors by applying perpendicular load to the buccal aspect of tooth crowns. Fractured teeth were randomly assigned into one of three reattachment protocols: (i) Simple reattachment, (ii) Overcontour preparation, and (iii) Internal dentin groove. The first and second groups were divided into 10 subgroups, and the third group into five subgroups (n = 10 per group) with respect to five different adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Adper Single Bond II, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S(3) Bond, G Bond) used with or without a hybrid resin composite (Z250). Restored teeth were subjected to thermal cycling, and subsequently to the same loading protocol used for fracturing intact teeth. Fracture strength after reattachment procedures was recorded as a percentage of the original fracture strength. Both type of adhesive material and placement of an intermediate layer of resin composite affected the fracture resistance (P < 0.05). The highest fracture strength recovery was obtained using the internal dentin groove technique (54 +/- 0.58%, P < 0.05), followed by the overcontour and simple reattachment protocols (49 +/- 0.58% and 32 +/- 0.82%, respectively, P < 0.05). Ultramorphological evaluation of bonded specimens revealed voids and microcracks along the adhesive interface, which might contribute to postadhesive failure.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth Fractures/therapy , Tooth Preparation/methods , Composite Resins , Dental Stress Analysis , Humans , Incisor/injuries , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Resin Cements , Tooth Crown/injuries , Tooth Fractures/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...