Incorporation of Core Biopsy and FNAB in the Diagnostic Algorithm for Endophytic and Submucosal Laryngeal Malignancies: A Technical Note.

Aim to determine the effectiveness of Endolaryngeal Core Biopsy and Fine Needle aspiration Cytology in endophytic or submucosal laryngeal malignancies. BACKGROUND: Endophytic and submucosal laryngeal tumours pose as diagnostic as well as management challenges to the head and neck surgeon. Identifying the tumour location and extent of disease is crucial for the surgeon to determine the treatment options and the potential outcomes. Persistent laryngeal edema following radiotherapy also presents with a diagnostic dilemma, as distinguishing between recurrent laryngeal carcinoma and radiotherapy sequels; which include fibrosis, oedema and soft tissue and cartilage necrosis, can be confusing and punch biopsies performed in such cases would more than often yield inadequate or superficial tissue. Using a core biopsy gun for acquiring biopsy specimen is known to have more cellular material, less damage to the surrounding structure depth control, immediate analysis with higher accuracy rates. TECHNIQUE: Patients with suspected laryngeal malignancy are initially evaluated with flexible endoscopy with Narrow band imaging (NBI) and appropriate imaging. These patients are subjected to Microlaryngoscopic under general anaesthesia. A core biopsy gun is used to obtain samples from the suspicious area. Simultaneously, with the aid of microlaryngeal forceps, an FNAC is also done and sent for rapid processing. CONCLUSION: Trucut biopsy is a novel diagnostic tool that can be commonly used in early laryngeal malignancies especially in those cases where there is strong suspicion of malignancy and the lesion is found to be submucosal. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: we noted that a routine DL scopy and Biopsy in submucoal disease often results in a acquiring a non-representative sample as well as causing inadvertent trauma to the surrounding mucosa. We encourage Laryngeal surgeons to routinely use Core biopsies and FNAC during routine microlaryngeal Examination for better yield, faster diagnosis and faster planning of treatment protocols.

Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- A comparison with videofluoroscopy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: In adults, fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has established its place in the assessment of dysphagia and aspiration vis-à-vis the current gold standard, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS), almost at parity. However, in children with quite a different set of factors in play, its role is not certain. The primary objective was to measure the accuracy of FEES in young children with dysphagia, compared to VFSS. The secondary objective was to correlate other endoscopic findings with aspiration in videofluoroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-five children, aged 0.4-36 months with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration underwent FEES and VFSS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and diagnostic agreement of FEES were calculated using VFSS as the gold standard. To test the statistical significance of the difference in two measurements, Mc Nemar's Chi-square test was used and to test the agreement between FEES and VFSS, Kappa value was calculated. To test the statistical significance of the association of endoscopic findings with VFSS findings, Chi-square test was used. RESULTS: FEES performed in young children was found to be less sensitive (50%) but more specific of aspiration (82%) with an accuracy of 77% in comparison with VFSS. The reverse was true of penetration (81%, 44% and 59% respectively). The agreement between FEES and VFSS in young children, on all parameters were low (k = 0.061-0.302). Endoscopic findings such as glottic secretions (P = 0.02), weak or diminished laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) (P = 0.001) and penetration (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with aspiration in VFSS. Excessive secretions in the hypopharynx had a stronger correlation with oesophageal dysmotility (P = 0.02) than pharyngeal dysphagia (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: FEES in young children appears to have a low agreement with VFSS unlike in adults. Aspiration observed in FEES is likely to be significant since specificity is high. FEES negative for aspiration may be interpreted taking into account, the aspiration risk of the subject and/or other endoscopic risk factors (penetration, weak/absent LAR & glottic secretions), if VFSS is not a viable alternative.

Observations from a pediatric dysphagia clinic: Characteristics of children at risk of aspiration pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical variables that are predictive of aspiration pneumonia are not clear in the pediatric population. This study was conducted in order to identify the demographic, clinical, and radiological risk factors for the development of aspiration pneumonia in children referred to the dysphagia clinic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records of 88 children referred to the dysphagia clinic who had undergone videofluroscopic swallow study (VFSS). RESULTS: Oropharyngeal dysphagia was found in 61.3% (54 of 88). Incidence of aspiration pneumonia was 39.8% (35 of 88). CONCLUSION: Respiratory symptoms such as cough, choking, excessive secretions, and pharyngeal dysmotility other than aspiration in VFSS were not predictors of pneumonia. Infants and children with laryngotracheal anomalies, demonstrable aspiration in VFSS, and major cardiac illness are at risk of presenting with aspiration pneumonia. Whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or esophageal dysmotility are causative of aspiration in the rest of the population needs to be investigated by future prospective studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b. Laryngoscope, 129:2614-2618, 2019.