Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate.

The accurate assessment of cytotoxicity is important for evaluating the potential of a test agent to induce pathologies that result from cell killing and to determine appropriate doses for other endpoints, such as genetic toxicology studies. The objective of this work was to determine the most sensitive assays for assessing cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells following short-term (1 h) and long-term (24 h) exposure to cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). Eight in vitro cytotoxicity assays with different endpoints were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Kentucky reference 1R4F (K1R4F) CSC in CHO cells. The assays used for this study were neutral red uptake, LDH release, kenacid blue binding, MTT formation, XTT formation, acid phosphatase activity, sulforhodamine B binding and resazurin binding. Four of the more widely used cytotoxicity assays (neutral red, MTT, kenacid blue and LDH) were also evaluated at 3-, 6-, 12- and 18-h time points. At the 1-h exposure time, LDH was the most sensitive with toxicity observed beginning at 100 microg/ml. None of the other assays demonstrated a concentration-dependent increase in toxicity after 1-h exposures even at the maximum concentration of 150 microg/ml of CSC. Following 24 h of exposure, neutral red and kenacid blue were the most sensitive. The results of our study indicate the assay that measured membrane integrity was the most sensitive for short exposure times, whereas the neutral red and kenacid blue assays that measured total cell number were more sensitive for longer exposure times.

Quantification of changes in c-myc mRNA levels in normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) and lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells following chemical treatment.

Lung tumors frequently exhibit altered expression of oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes. Although some of these alterations are believed to arise from chemical exposure, the ability of specific chemicals to cause distinct changes in gene expression is not well characterized. We previously reported the development of a quantitative reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) method for measuring c-myc mRNA levels, and reported that c-myc proto-oncogene expression is significantly increased in small-cell lung carcinoma cells. In the present study, quantitative RT/PCR was used to assess the effect of model toxins cycloheximide (CHX), a protein synthesis inhibitor, and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), a DNA alkylating agent, on c-myc mRNA levels in normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) and lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells. Expression of c-myc was evaluated at 1-100 microM CHX and MNNG and was compared to the cytotoxic response as measured by the neutral red assay. Cycloheximide elicited a dose-dependent increase in c-myc mRNA levels in NHBE and A549 cells, but did not alter expression of the housekeeping gene beta-actin. A maximum increase for c-myc expression (200% of control) was observed 5 h after treatment with noncytotoxic concentrations. In contrast, MNNG elicited a dose-dependent decrease in c-myc expression in A549 cells, but no significant change in c-myc was observed in NHBE cells. The results from this study suggest that the quantitative RT/PCR method may be an appropriate technique for monitoring gene expression changes following chemical exposure. Hence, these types of studies may assist in the identification of specific chemicals which may induce the genetic alterations involved in the development of lung cancer as well as provide information relevant to the interactive effects of chemicals within complex mixtures.

Comparison of the cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of liquid smoke food flavourings, cigarette smoke condensate and wood smoke condensate.

Although products of pyrolysis are often cytotoxic and mutagenic, the relationship between the type of material pyrolysed and the toxicity of the resulting pyrolysis products is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of several types of common pyrolysis products. The cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of these products were assessed by using neutral red uptake and Ames mutagenicity assays, respectively. The biological activities of four liquid smoke food flavourings (LSF) were compared with two other pyrolysis-derived materials; cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) and a wood smoke condensate (WSC). Results indicated all of the mixtures exhibited a concentration-dependent cytotoxic response. The CSC and WSC were less cytotoxic than three of the LSFs, but more cytotoxic than one of the brands. The CSC was mutagenic in two Salmonella strains; however, none of the LSFs or WSC was mutagenic using TA98, and only three of the LSFs were positive with TA100. The six pyrolysis-derived materials evaluated in this study showed differing patterns and magnitudes of cytotoxicity and mutagenicity. These results indicate that the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of complex mixtures derived from pyrolysis products are affected by the type of material pyrolysed and/or the method used to prepare the mixture. The cytotoxic potential of some commercial smoke flavourings is greater than cigarette smoke condensate and several of the food flavourings are mutagenic in one Salmonella strain.

Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicology of mainstream smoke condensate.

The genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) from a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco (TOB-HT) was compared with that of CSC from a Kentucky reference low "tar" cigarette (1R4F) representative of the current US cigarette market, and Kentucky Reference 1R5F, representative of ultra-low "tar" cigarettes on the US market. TOB-HT was evaluated at concentrations which induced concentration-dependent positive responses with 1R4F and 1R5F in an in vitro toxicology test battery which included sister chromatid exchange, chromosome aberration, and neutral red cytotoxicity assays in CHO cells, and the Ames bacterial mutagenicity assay. CSC from 1R4F and 1R5F was positive in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1538 and TA1537, and negative with TA1535, while CSC from TOB-HT was negative in all five strains. CSC from 1R4F and 1R5F cigarettes was positive in sister chromatid exchange (SCE), chromosome aberration (CA) and neutral red cytotoxicity assays, while CSC from the TOB-HT cigarette yielded negative results in all the above endpoints. These data indicate that in these assays the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of CSC from the new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco is significantly less than CSC from Kentucky reference 1R4F and 1R5F cigarettes, which are representative of cigarettes currently sold in the US.