Postoperative Revision, Complication and Economic Outcomes of Patients with Reverse or Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty at One Year: A Retrospective, United States Hospital Billing Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on the one-year postoperative revision, complication, and economic outcomes in a hospital setting after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are sparse. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database, a hospital-billing data source, evaluated one-year postoperative revision, complication, and economic outcomes of reverse (RTSA) and anatomic (ATSA) TSA for patients who underwent the procedure from 2015 until 2021. All-cause revisits, including revision-related events (categorized as either irrigation and débridement or revision procedures and device removals) and shoulder/non-shoulder complications were collected. The incidences and costs of these revisits were evaluated. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate the associations between patient characteristics and revision and complication occurrences and costs. RESULTS: Among 51,478 RTSA and 34,623 ATSA patients (mean [standard deviation (SD)] ages RTSA 71.5 [8.1] years, ATSA 66.8 [9.0] years), one-year adjusted incidences of all-cause revisits, irrigation/débridement, revision procedures/device removals, and shoulder/non-shoulder complications were RTSA: 45.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 44.6%-45.5%), 0.1% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.2%), 2.1% (95% CI: 2.0%-2.2%), and 17.8% (95% CI: 17.5%-18.1%) and ATSA: 42.3% (95% CI: 41.8%-42.9%), 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.2%), 1.9% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.1%), and 14.4% (95% CI: 14.0%-14.8%), respectively; shoulder-related complications were RTSA: 12.4% (95% CI: 12.1%-12.7%) and ATSA: 9.9% (95% CI: 9.6%-10.3%). Significant factors associated with a high risk of revisions and complications included, but were not limited to, chronic comorbidities and noncommercial insurance. Per patient, the mean (SD) total one-year hospital cost was $25,225 ($15,911) and $21,520 ($13,531) for RTSA and ATSA, respectively. Revision procedures and device removals were most costly, averaging $22,920 ($18,652) and $26,911 ($18,619) per procedure for RTSA and ATSA, respectively. Patients with revision-related events with infections had higher total hospital costs than patients without this event (RTSA: $60,887 (95% CI: $56,951-$64,823) and ATSA: $59,478 (95% CI: $52,312-$66,644)), equating to a mean difference of $36,148 with RTSA and $38,426 with ATSA. Significant factors associated with higher costs of revision-related events and complications included age, race, chronic comorbidities, and noncommercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 45% RTSA and 42% ATSA patients returned to the hospital, most often for shoulder/non-shoulder complications (overall 17.8% RTSA and 14.4% ATSA, and shoulder-related 12.4% RTSA and 9.9% ATSA). Revisions and device removals were most expensive ($22,920 RTSA and $26,911 ATSA). Infection complications requiring revision had the highest one-year hospital costs (∼$60,000). This study highlights the need for technologies and surgical techniques that may help reduce TSA healthcare utilization and economic burden.

Comparing the volume of vascular intersection of two femoral neck fracture fixation implants using an In silico technique.

Femoral neck fracture displacement with subsequent vascular disruption is one of the factors that contribute to trauma-induced avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Iatrogenic damage of the intraosseous arterial system during fixation of femoral neck fracture is another possible cause of avascular necrosis that is less well understood. Recently, Zhao et al (2017) reconstructed 3D structures of intraosseous blood supply and identified the epiphyseal and inferior retinacular arterial system to be important structures for maintaining the femoral head blood supply after femoral neck fracture. The authors therefore recommended placing implants centrally to reduce iatrogenic vascular injuries. Our in vitro study compared the spatial footprint of a traditional dynamic hip screw with an antirotation screw versus a newly developed hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw on intraosseous vasculature. Methods: Three dimensional (3D) µCT angiograms of 9 cadaveric proximal femora were produced. Three segmented volumes-porous or cancellous bone, filled or cortical bone, and intraosseous vasculature-were converted to surface files. 3D in silico models of the fixation systems were sized and implanted in silico without visibility of the vascular maps. The volume of vasculature that overlapped with the devices was determined. The ratio of the vascular intersection to the comparator device was calculated, and the mean ratio was determined. A paired design, noninferiority test was used to compare the devices. Results: Results indicate both significant (P < 0.001) superiority and noninferiority of the hip screw with an integrated antirotation screw when compared with a dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw for the volume of vasculature that overlapped with each device in the femoral neck. Conclusions: Combining established methods of vascular visualization with newer methods enables an implant's impact on vascular intersection to be assessed in silico. This methodology suggests that when used for femoral neck fracture management, the new device intersects fewer blood vessels than the comparator. Comparative clinical studies are needed to investigate whether these findings correlate with the incidence of avascular necrosis and clinical outcomes.

Incidence, costs and post-operative complications following ankle fracture - A US claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology and payer costs for ankle fractures are not well documented. This study evaluated: (1) the incidence of ankle fracture and ankle surgery following fracture in the US population; and (2) the clinical presentation of patients presenting with ankle fractures requiring surgery, their complication rates, and payer costs. METHODS: Patients in the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases with an inpatient/outpatient diagnosis of ankle fracture from 2016 to 2019 were stratified by age group and gender, and rates of fracture per 10,000 enrollees were estimated. Surgically-treated patients between January 2016 - October 2021 were further analyzed. One-year post-surgical outcomes evaluated complication rates (e.g., infection, residual pain), reoperations, and 1-year payments. Standard descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and outcomes. Generalized linear models were designed to estimate payments for surgical care and incremental payments associated with postoperative complications. RESULTS: Fracture cases affected 0.14% of the population; 23.4% of fractures required surgery. Pediatric and elderly patients were at increased risk. From 3 weeks to 12 months following index ankle surgery, 5.5% (5.3% - 5.7%) of commercially insured and 5.9% (5.1% - 6.8%) of Medicare patients required a new surgery. Infection was observed in 4.4% (4.2% - 4.6%) commercially insured and 9.8% (8.8% - 10.9%) Medicare patients, and residual pain 3 months post-surgery was observed in 29.5% (28.7% - 30.3%) commercially-insured and 39.3% (36.0% - 42.6%) Medicare patients. Commercial payments for index surgery ranged from $9,821 (95% CI: $9,697 - $9,945) in the ambulatory surgical center to $28,169 (95% CI: $27,780 - $28,559) in the hospital inpatient setting, and from $16,775 (95% CI: $16,668 - $16,882) in patients with closed fractures, to $41,206 (95% CI: $38,795 - $43,617) in patients with Gustilo III fractures. Incremental commercial payments for pain and infection averaged $5,200 (95% CI: $4,261 - $6,139) and $27,510 (95% CI: $21,759 - $33,261), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ankle fracture has a high incidence and complication rate. Residual pain affects more than one-third of all patients. Ankle fracture thus presents a significant societal impact in terms of patient outcomes and payer burden.

Medical resource utilization and costs for intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic hip fractures following total hip arthroplasty in the medicare population: A retrospective cohort study.

This study assessed the impact of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHFx) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) on health care resource utilization and costs in the Medicare population.This retrospective observational cohort study used health care claims from the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Standard Analytic File (100%) sample. Patients aged 65+ with primary THA between 2010 and 2016 were identified and divided into 3 groups - patients with intraoperative PPHFx, patients with postoperative PPHFx within 90 days of THA, and patients without PPHFx. A multi-level matching technique, using direct and propensity score matching was used. The proportion of patients admitted at least once to skilled nursing facility (SNF), inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), and readmission during the 0 to 90 or 0 to 365 day period after THA as well as the total all-cause payments during those periods were compared between patients in PPHFx groups and patients without PPHFx.After dual matching, a total 4460 patients for intraoperative and 2658 patients for postoperative PPHFx analyses were included. Utilization of any 90-day post-acute services was statistically significantly higher among patients in both PPHFx groups versus those without PPHFx: for intraoperative analysis, SNF (41.7% vs 30.8%), IRF (17.7% vs 10.1%), and readmissions (17.6% vs 11.5%); for postoperative analysis, SNF (64.5% vs 28.7%), IRF (22.6% vs 7.2%), and readmissions (92.8% vs 8.8%) (all P < .0001). The mean 90-day total all-cause payments were significantly higher in both intraoperative ($30,114 vs $21,229) and postoperative ($53,669 vs $ 19,817, P < .0001) PPHFx groups versus those without PPHFx. All trends were similar in the 365-day follow up.Patients with intraoperative and early postoperative PPHFx had statistically significantly higher resource utilization and payments than patients without PPHFx after primary THA. The differences observed during the 90-day follow up were continued over the 1-year period as well.

Surgical treatment, complications, and reimbursement among patients with clavicle fracture and acromioclavicular dislocations: a US retrospective claims database analysis.

Aims: To assess rates of surgical treatment, post-surgical complications, reoperations, and reimbursement in patients with clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. Materials and methods: This US retrospective study used data from patients with ≥1 diagnosis of clavicle fracture or AC dislocation (index) between 2012-2016. Surgical treatment was defined as a procedure within 4 weeks after clavicle fracture/AC dislocation. Rates of complications (infection, non-union, mal-union), reoperations (device removal or revisions), and all-cause healthcare reimbursement (adjusted to 2016$) were evaluated 2 years post-index among surgical patients. Results: A total of 95,243 patients with clavicle fracture and 52,100 patients with AC dislocation were identified. Mean (SD) age for clavicle fracture and AC dislocation was 23.8 (18.6) and 33.0 (15.6) years, respectively. Most clavicle fracture and AC dislocation patients were male (70.9% and 78.0%, respectively), and had few comorbidities (86.4% and 84.8% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index = 0 and 73.1% and 66.0% had Elixhauser = 0, respectively). Only 15.2% of clavicle fracture and 5.3% of AC dislocation patients received surgical treatment. Among patients undergoing surgical treatment, 2-year rates of infection, non-union, and mal-union were 1.0%, 4.2%, and 0.9%, respectively, for clavicle fracture, and 2.0%, 0.9%, and 0.1%, respectively, for AC dislocation. Reoperations occurred in 83.0% of clavicle fracture and 67.5% of AC dislocation patients. Mean (SD) 2-year reimbursement was $27,635 ($68,173) for clavicle fracture and $23,096 ($28,746) for AC dislocation. Limitations: Administrative claims data lack clinical information, limiting inferences that can be made. This data may not be generalizable to other patients. Conclusions: Rates of surgical treatment for clavicle fractures and AC dislocation and rates of infection, non-union, and mal-union among surgically-treated patients were low. However, surgical patients had high rates of device removal or revision surgery during 2-year follow-up. Improved surgical methods and technologies could reduce non-planned reoperations and device removals, thereby reducing healthcare system costs.

Examination of Skill Acquisition and Grader Bias in a Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Model.

OBJECTIVES: Primary: Assess the ability of faculty graders to predict the objectively measured strength of distal radius fracture fixation. Secondary: Compare resident skill variation and retention related to other knowable training data. DESIGN: Residents were allowed 60 minutes to stabilize a standardized distal radius fracture using an assigned fixed-angle volar plate. Faculty observed and subjectively graded the residents without providing real-time feedback. Objective biomechanical evaluation (construct strength and stiffness) was compared to subjective grades. Resident-specific characteristics (sex, PGY, and ACGME case log) were also used to compare the objective data. SETTING: A simulated operating room in our laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Post-graduate year 2, 3, 4, and 5 orthopedic residents. RESULTS: Primary: Faculty were not successful at predicting objectively measured fixation, and their subjective scoring suggests confirmation bias as PGY increased. Secondary: Resident year-in-training alone did not predict objective measures (p = 0.53), but was predictive of subjective scores (p < 0.001). Skills learned were not always retained, as 29% of residents objectively failed subsequent to passing. Notably, resident-reported case-specific experience alone was inversely correlated with objective fixation strength. CONCLUSIONS: This testing model enabled the collection of objective and subjective resident skill scores. Faculty graders did not routinely predict objective measures, and their subjective assessment appears biased related to PGY. Also, in vivo case volume alone does not predict objective results. Familiar faculty teaching consistency, and resident grading by external faculty unfamiliar with tested residents, might alter these results.

Pilot report: non-operative treatment of Mayo Type II olecranon fractures in any-age adult patient.

BACKGROUND: We report on the non-operative treatment of Mayo Type II olecranon fractures. METHODS: Fourteen isolated Mayo Type II olecranon fractures were treated non-operatively, followed to discharge, and retrospectively reviewed. Treatment was splinting in extension followed by protected active motion beginning 3 weeks to 4 weeks post-injury. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were available in 86% and 64% of cases, respectively. Follow-up radiographs were obtained. RESULTS: At discharge, the mean (SD) MEPI score was 95 (5). The mean (SD) elbow motion arc was 121° (21°). One patient re-fractured his elbow after discharge by falling on the ice. He recovered after open reduction and internal fixation. One patient (documented Marfan syndrome) developed an asymptomatic non-union. Excepting the patient who fell, no patient received additional care. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot report, Mayo Type II olecranon fractures were treated non-operatively to discharge. Good to excellent results were obtained in all patients according to the MEPI. Supportive care of these fractures should be comparatively studied. A downside risk to providing supportive care for these fractures was not identified.

Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) Does Not Assess the Quality of the Surgical Result Effectively.

BACKGROUND: Performance assessment in skills training is ideally based on objective, reliable, and clinically relevant indicators of success. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) is a reliable and valid tool that has been increasingly used in orthopaedic skills training. It uses a global rating approach to structure expert evaluation of technical skills with the experts working from a list of operative competencies that are each rated on a 5-point Likert scale anchored by behavioral descriptors. Given the observational nature of its scoring, the OSATS might not effectively assess the quality of surgical results. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does OSATS scoring in an intraarticular fracture reduction training exercise correlate with the quality of the reduction? (2) Does OSATS scoring in a cadaveric extraarticular fracture fixation exercise correlate with the mechanical integrity of the fixation? METHODS: Orthopaedic residents at the University of Iowa (six postgraduate year [PGY]-1s) and at the University of Minnesota (seven PGY-1s and eight PGY-2s) undertook a skills training exercise that involved reducing a simulated intraarticular fracture under fluoroscopic guidance. Iowa residents participated three times during 1 month, and Minnesota residents participated twice with 1 month between their two sessions. A fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologist rated each performance using a modified OSATS scoring scheme. The quality of the articular reduction obtained was then directly measured. Regression analysis was performed between OSATS scores and two metrics of articular reduction quality: articular surface deviation and estimated contact stress. Another skills training exercise involved fixing a simulated distal radius fracture in a cadaveric specimen. Thirty residents, distributed across four PGY classes (PGY-2 and PGY-3, n = 8 each; PGY-4 and PGY-5, n = 7 each), simultaneously completed the exercise at individual stations. One of three faculty hand surgeons independently scored each performance using a validated OSATS scoring system. The mechanical integrity of each fixation construct was then assessed in a materials testing machine. Regression analysis was performed between OSATS scores and two metrics of fixation integrity: stiffness and failure load. RESULTS: In the intraarticular fracture model, OSATS scores did not correlate with articular reduction quality (maximum surface deviations: R = 0.17, p = 0.25; maximum contact stress: R = 0.22, p = 0.13). Similarly in the cadaveric extraarticular fracture model, OSATS scores did not correlate with the integrity of the mechanical fixation (stiffness: R = 0.10, p = 0.60; failure load: R = 0.30, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: OSATS scoring methods do not effectively assess the quality of the surgical result. Efforts must be made to incorporate assessment metrics that reflect the quality of the surgical result. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: New objective, reliable, and clinically relevant measures of the quality of the surgical result obtained by a trainee are urgently needed. For intraarticular fracture reduction and extraarticular fracture fixation, direct physical measurement of reduction quality and of mechanical integrity of fixation, respectively, meet this need.

On orthopedic surgical skill prediction--the limited value of traditional testing.

OBJECTIVES: Primary: to assess the utility of our distal radius fracture repair model as a tool for examining residents' surgical skills. Secondary: to compare the residents' ability to achieve specific biomechanically measured fracture stability with traditional test scores. DESIGN: Our laboratory pioneered a model that measures biomechanical qualities of a repaired distal radius fracture. Before participation, all residents to be tested completed specified knowledge examinations. During the laboratory exercise, proctors observed each resident and completed Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills forms. At the completion of the laboratory, each specimen was tested biomechanically. Written examinations were completed in a proctored setting and computer examinations at home following the honor system. The laboratory exercise had adequate space and materials and allowed 60 minutes to complete the procedure. Residents had equal access to x-ray imaging. SETTING: The examination environment of the study resembled an operating room. PARTICIPANTS: Postgraduate years 3 and 4 orthopedic residents in our program were asked to participate. The institutional review board reviewed and approved the study as exempt. RESULTS: Fracture repair constructs capable of resisting loads expected during rehabilitation were created by approximately half the residents tested. However, traditional written and computer-based testing methods failed to predict which resident's fracture construct would pass the biomechanical testing. Prior in vivo similar case experience was not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The idea that "book smart does not equal street smart" applies to the tested model. To measure surgical skill acquisition and increase public safety related to surgery, it will be necessary to employ new and specific examination methods that identify the skill to be acquired and test the acquisition of this skill as precisely as possible.

Biomechanical Test of Three Methods to Treat Thumb CMC Arthritis.

Background Basilar thumb arthritis, or first carpometacarpal arthritis, is a common condition, predominantly affecting women. Surgical treatment of this condition is highly varied. One common method consists of trapezium excision and a concomitant procedure for treatment of the "floating" thumb metacarpal. That procedures vary suggests that no method has an "outcome" advantage over another. However, the frequency of side effects is higher in more complex procedures. Question/Purposes We speculated that in vitro testing might identify a potential outcome difference that has been difficult to measure in vivo. Since the more complex procedure to treat this condition has a higher frequency of clinical side effects, we hoped to determine its functional value compared with less complex procedures. Methods A two-degrees-of-freedom biomechanical cadaver study examined simulated pinch strength and metacarpal subsidence during pinch. Three methods were compared with each other and against the normal pretreatment state: trapezial excision alone; trapezial excision and suture suspensionplasty (TESS); and trapezial excision followed by a ligament reconstruction using one-half of the flexor carpi radialis and tendon interposition (LRTI). Results After TESS, the loaded mean height of the arthroplasty space was 1.20 cm. This was statistically less than the pretreatment height of 1.50 cm (P < 0.05). However, the height maintained after LRTI (1.00 cm) was also statistically less than pretreatment state (P < 0.05) and less than TESS (P < 0.05). Trapezial excision alone was least successful at maintaining height. In contrast, the mean key pinch measured after treatment could not be predicted by treatment employed. Conclusions In summary, the tested technique of TESS appears to be biomechanically sound as related to maintenance of first metacarpal height. In in vitro testing it is superior to excision alone and at least equal to the ligament reconstruction method tested. Analysis of our data shows that 96% of the overall height (distance) maintained post excision is explained by surgical state. Clinical Relevance Trapezial height is preserved using support schemes in a laboratory setting. In the in vivo postsurgical state, clinical intrinsic muscle function may be superior when support is used compared with trapeziectomy alone.

Scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries: a retrospective review of treatment and outcomes in 82 wrists.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of treatment for scapholunate instability between acute (< 6 wk from injury) and chronic (> 6 wk) injuries, between complete and partial tears, and among surgical techniques; identify risk factors for surgical failure; and compare ligament reconstruction with repair with or without capsulodesis in the chronic period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 82 primary scapholunate interosseous ligament surgeries, with median follow-up of 150 days. A total of 27 patients underwent surgery in the acute period and 50 in the chronic period. (In 5 patients we were unable to determine acuity or chronicity of injury.) In the chronic period, 16 patients underwent repair with or without capsulodesis, 27 underwent ligament reconstruction, and 7 underwent other procedures. RESULTS: Surgical intervention in the acute setting involved more complex injuries, most commonly used direct repair, and produced a significantly lower failure rate than chronic intervention. In the chronic setting, the most common technique was ligament reconstruction, which produced superior radiographic outcomes compared with repair with or without capsulodesis. Isolated scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries undergoing chronic surgical intervention composed the majority of failures. Workers' compensation status and chronic intervention were significant risk factors for failure. CONCLUSIONS: For chronic injuries, ligament reconstruction produced better radiographic outcomes than repair with or without capsulodesis. Acute intervention (within 6 wk) was preferable to chronic intervention for scapholunate interosseous ligament injuries, and a substantial number of isolated injuries failed to receive treatment in the acute period. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.

Simulation of altered excursion of the pronator quadratus.

Background Loss of forearm rotation is frequently seen after healing of distal radius fractures. Questions/Purposes Our purpose was to determine whether restricted excursion of the pronator quadratus muscle can affect forearm rotation. Methods We evaluated the relationship between pronator quadratus excursion and forearm rotation in a cadaveric model. Eight adult fresh-frozen above-elbow specimens were attached to a mounting device that permitted free rotation of the forearm around its ulnar axis. Forearm rotation was measured with a protractor while alternating pronation and supination loads were applied. Measurements were repeated after restricting the excursion of pronator quadratus by 10, 20, and 30% of its initial length. Results There was a mean 15° loss of supination for each 10% reduction in pronator excursion. There was no significant effect on pronation. Conclusions We conclude that, independent of any bone deformity or nearby joint stiffness, posttraumatic scarring of this muscle may result in a loss of supination.

Trapezium excision and suture suspensionplasty (TESS) for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.

Basilar thumb arthritis, or first carpometacarpal arthritis, is a common condition affecting older women and some men. It is estimated that as many as one third of postmenopausal woman are affected. Surgical treatment of this condition includes options ranging from arthrodesis to prosthetic arthroplasty. Intermediate options include complete or partial trapezial excision with or without interposition of a cushioning/stabilizing material (auto source, allo source, synthetic source). A multitude of methods appear to offer similar end results, although some methods definitely involve more surgical work and perhaps greater patient risk. Through retrospective evaluation of a cohort of patients who underwent suture suspensionplasty, we determined the postoperative effect on strength, motion, patient satisfaction, complications, and radiographic maintenance of the scaphoid-metacarpal distance. This review shows the method to be clinically effective and, by comparison with a more traditional ligament reconstruction trapezial interposition arthroplasty, the method does not require use of autograft or allograft tendon and has fewer surgical steps. Forty-four patients were included in this retrospective study. The results showed that 91% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. Pinch and grip strength remained the same preoperatively and postoperatively. A Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand patient-reported outcome instrument (DASH) scores averaged 30 at final follow-up. Three patients developed a late complication requiring further surgical intervention. In summary, this technique appears to be technically reproducible, requires no additional tendon material, and achieves objectively and subjectively similar results to other reported procedures used to manage first CMC Arthritis.

Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley: a cadaver study.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley has been used for treatment of trigger fingers with success. However, lack of direct visualization raises concerns about the completeness of the release and about potential injury to the tendons or neurovascular structures. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous release of the A1 pulley in a cadaveric model using a commonly available instrument, a #15 scalpel blade. METHODS: Fourteen fresh frozen cadaveric hands (54 fingers, thumbs excluded) were used. Landmarks were established for the A1 pulley based upon cutaneous features. Percutaneous release was performed using a #15 blade. The specimens were then dissected and examined for any tendon or neurovascular injury, and completeness of A1 pulley release was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 39 (72%) complete releases of the A1 pulley with 14 partial and 1 missed (failed) release. There was a 22% incidence of release of the proximal edge of the A2 pulley. However, there was no case of release of more than 25% of the A2 pulley length, nor was bowstringing of flexor tendons seen in these specimens. Eleven digits showed longitudinal scoring of the flexor tendons and 3 had partial tendon lacerations. No neurovascular injuries were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous release of the A1 pulley using a #15 blade was associated with good efficacy and an acceptable margin of safety in this series. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Percutaneous release of trigger digits may assume a greater role in the treatment of patients with trigger finger because of cost containment pressures. The data from this study suggest that the technique used in this study is both safe and effective. With use of proper anatomical guidelines, risk to neurovascular structures is low, although longitudinal scoring of the tendon can occur.

Objective structured assessment of technical skill in upper extremity surgery.

PURPOSE: Objective assessment of technical skills in hand surgery has been lacking. This article reports on an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills format of a multiple bench-station evaluation of orthopedic surgery residents' technical skills for 3 common upper extremity surgeries. METHODS: Twenty-seven residents (6 postgraduate year [PGY] 2, 8 PGY 3, 8 PGY 4, and 5 PGY 5) participated in the examination. Each resident performed surgery on a cadaveric specimen at 3 stations, trigger finger release (TFR), open carpal tunnel release, and distal radius fracture fixation. A board-certified hand surgeon evaluated trainee performance at each station, using a procedure-specific detailed checklist, a validated global rating scale, and pass/fail assessment. A resident post-testing evaluation was collected. RESULTS: Construct validity with correlation between year in training and detailed checklist scores was demonstrated for TFR and carpal tunnel release; between year in training and global rating scores for TFR and distal radius fracture fixation; and between year in training and pass/fail assessment for TFR. Criterion validity was demonstrated by the correlation between global rating scale scores, detailed checklist scores, and pass/fail assessment for TFR, carpal tunnel release, and distal radius fracture fixation. Time to complete the surgery was not correlated with surgical performance. Residents rated the multiple-station Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills format as highly educational. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports that a surgeon's ability to release a trigger finger does not correlate specifically to his or her ability to perform a carpal tunnel release or to perform plate fixation of a radius fracture. The results of this study would indicate that, for 3 different surgical simulations representing procedures of varying complexity, assessments by a single assessment tool is not adequate. To completely understand a resident's abilities, assessment by checklist (understanding the steps of the surgery), global rating scales (assessment of basic surgical skills in light of lesser or greater complexity surgeries), and pass/fail assessment (examination of adverse events) are all necessary components. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Treatment of distal radius fractures.

The clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies on the treatment of distal radius fractures in adults. None of the 29 recommendations made by the work group was graded as strong; most are graded as inconclusive or consensus; seven are graded as weak. The remaining five moderate-strength recommendations include surgical fixation, rather than cast fixation, for fractures with postreduction radial shortening >3 mm, dorsal tilt >10 degrees , or intra-articular displacement or step-off >2 mm; use of rigid immobilization rather than removable splints for nonsurgical treatment; making a postreduction true lateral radiograph of the carpus to assess dorsal radial ulnar joint alignment; beginning early wrist motion following stable fixation; and recommending adjuvant treatment with vitamin C to prevent disproportionate pain.

Validation of an online assessment of orthopedic surgery residents' cognitive skills and preparedness for carpal tunnel release surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical competence requires both cognitive and technical skills. Relatively little is found in the literature regarding the value of Web-based assessments to measure surgery residents' mastery of the competencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of 2 online instruments for predicting the cognitive preparedness of residents for performing carpal tunnel release surgery. METHOD: Twenty-eight orthopedic residents and 2 medical school students responded to an online measure of their perception of preparedness and to an online cognitive skills assessment prior to an objective structured assessment of technical skills, in which they performed carpal tunnel release surgery on cadaveric specimens and received a pass/fail assessment. The 2 online assessments were analyzed for their internal reliability, external correlation with the pass/fail decision, and construct validity. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the perception of preparedness measure was high (α  =  .92) while the cognitive assessment was less strong (α  =  .65). Both instruments demonstrated moderately strong correlations with the pass/fail decision, with Spearman correlation of .606 (P  =  .000) and .617 (P  =  .000), respectively. Using logistic regression to analyze the predictive strength of each instrument, the perception of preparedness measure demonstrated a 76% probability (η(2)  =  .354) and the cognitive skills assessment a 73% probability (η(2)  =  .381) of correctly predicting the pass/fail decision. Analysis of variance modeling resulted in significant differences between levels at P < .005, supporting good construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: The online perception of preparedness measure and the cognitive skills assessment both are valid and reliable predictors of readiness to successfully pass a cadaveric motor skills test of carpal tunnel release surgery.